Relevant conflict of interest/financial disclosures: Nothing to report.
Should treatment for Parkinson's disease start immediately on diagnosis or delayed until functional disability develops?†
Article first published online: 14 APR 2011
Copyright © 2010 Movement Disorder Society
Volume 26, Issue 7, pages 1187–1193, June 2011
How to Cite
Clarke, C. E., Patel, S., Ives, N., Rick, C., Wheatley, K. and Gray, R. (2011), Should treatment for Parkinson's disease start immediately on diagnosis or delayed until functional disability develops?. Mov. Disord., 26: 1187–1193. doi: 10.1002/mds.23519
Full financial disclosures and author roles may be found in the online version of this article.
- Issue published online: 20 JUN 2011
- Article first published online: 14 APR 2011
- Manuscript Accepted: 13 OCT 2010
- Manuscript Revised: 20 AUG 2010
- Manuscript Received: 9 JUN 2010
- Parkinson's disease;
- quality of life;
- health economics
Evidence from clinical trials with monoamine oxidase type B inhibitors (TEMPO, ADAGIO and DATATOP) and levodopa (ELLDOPA) suggests that Parkinson's disease patients may benefit from treatment being commenced immediately on diagnosis rather than waiting for functional disability to develop, as is traditional clinical practice.
We performed a narrative literature review and meta-analysis of delayed-start design trials in Parkinson's disease.
There was inconsistency in the results of the two rasagiline delayed-start design trials, with early treatment with a 2 mg dose significantly superior in the TEMPO trial, but the 1 mg dose significantly better in the ADAGIO trial, making interpretation difficult. Further, the benefits of immediate treatment were small in terms of total unified Parkinson's disease rating scale scores, with a mean difference of 0.91 units (95% confidence interval 0.01, 1.80; P=0.05) in a meta-analysis of the TEMPO and ADAGIO delayed-start design trials. Such small differences are unlikely to be of clinical relevance. There is also little information on whether immediate treatment has a beneficial effect on patient quality of life with an acceptable adverse reaction profile, and we have no data on whether imediate treatment is cost-effective.
Based on the evidence available, changing clinical practice to immediate therapy on diagnosis is not warranted and further trials are needed. © 2011 Movement Disorder Society