Funding agencies: The Movement Disorder Society received unrestricted grants for the development of the UPDRS revision program from Boehringer Ingelheim USA, GlaxoSmithKline, and Pfizer, Inc. The UK Parkinson's Disease Society also provided support for assessment of subjects in the UK. Funding was also provided by the National Institute for Neurological Disorders and Stroke (U01NS043127). C.G.G. and G.T.S. are supported through the Parkinson's Disease Foundation Parkinson's Research Center.
Version of Record online: 6 AUG 2012
Copyright © 2012 Movement Disorder Society
Volume 27, Issue 10, pages 1239–1242, 1 September 2012
How to Cite
Goetz, C. G., Stebbins, G. T. and Tilley, B. C. (2012), Calibration of unified Parkinson's disease rating scale scores to Movement Disorder Society-unified Parkinson's disease rating scale scores. Mov. Disord., 27: 1239–1242. doi: 10.1002/mds.25122
Relevant conflicts of interest/financial disclosures: Nothing to report.
Full financial disclosures and author roles may be found in the online version of this article.
- Issue online: 13 SEP 2012
- Version of Record online: 6 AUG 2012
- Manuscript Accepted: 28 JUN 2012
- Manuscript Revised: 31 MAY 2012
- Manuscript Received: 28 MAR 2012
- Parkinson's disease;
- rating scale
The aim of this study was to develop formulas to convert the UPDRS to Movement Disorder Society (MDS)-UPDRS scores. The MDS-UPDRS is a revision of the UPDRS with sound clinimetric properties. Reliable formulas to recalculate UPDRS scores into MDS-UPDRS equivalents are pivotal to the practical transition and definitive adoption of the MDS-UPDRS. UPDRS and MDS-UPDRS scores were collected on 875 PD patients. A developmental sample was used to regress UPDRS scores on corresponding MDS-UPDRS scores based on three H & Y groupings (I/II, III, and IV/V). Regression weighting factors and intercept terms provided formulas for UPDRS conversions to be tested in a validation sample. Concordance between the true MDS-UPDRS Part scores and those derived from the formulas was compared using Bland-Altman's plots and Lin's concordance coefficient (LCC). Significant concordance between UPDRS-estimated MDS-UPDRS scores was achieved for Parts II (Motor Experiences of Daily Living) (LCC = 0.93) and III (Motor Examination) (LCC = 0.97). The formulas resulted in mean differences between the true MDS-UPDRS and estimated MDS-UPDRS scores of less than 1 point for both Parts II and III. Concordance was not achieved for Parts I and IV (Non-motor Experiences of Daily Living and Complications of Therapy). Formulas allow archival UPDRS Parts II and III individual patient data to be accurately transferred to MDS-UPDRS scores. Because Part I collects data on much more extensive information than the UPDRS, and because Part IV is structured differently in the two versions, old ratings for these parts cannot be converted. © 2012 Movement Disorder Society