SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • ACRL/SAA Standards for ethical conduct for rare book, manuscript, and special collections librarians, with guidelines for institutional practice in support of the standards, College & Research Libraries News, 54 (11), 207215.
  • Allen, N. (2009) Art Museum Images in Scholarly Publishing. Houston: Rice University Press.
  • Beat-Graber, C. (2008) Using Human Rights to Tackle Fragmentation in the Field of Traditional Cultural Expressions: An Institutional Approach in C.B.Graber and M.Burri-Nenova (editors). Intellectual Property and Traditional Cultural Expressions in a Digital Environment. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
  • Benedict, K. M., & Society of American Archivists. (2003). Ethics and the archival profession: Introduction and case studies. Chicago: Society of American Archivists.
  • Behrnd-Klodt, M. L., & Wosh, P. J. (Eds.). (2005). Privacy and confidentiality perspectives: Archivists and archival records. Chicago: Society of American Archivists.
  • Bielstein, S.M. (2006). Permissions a survival guide: Blunt talk about art as intellectual property. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Boles, F. (2005) Selecting and Appraising Archives and Manuscripts. Chicago: Society of American Archivists.
  • Bray, P. (2009). Flickr commons:Open licensing and the future of collections. Museums and the Web 2009, Indianapolis, IN.
  • Brown, M. F. (2003). Who owns native culture? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Burri-Nenova, M. (2008) The long tale of the rainbow serpent: New technologies and the protection and promotion of traditional cultural expressions, in C.B.Graber and M.Burri-Nenova (editors). Intellectual property and traditional cultural expressions in a digital environment. Cheltenham UK: Edward Elgar, pp. 205236.
  • Cameron, F., & Robinson, H. (2007). Digital knowledgescapes: Cultural, theoretical, practical and usage issues facing museum collection databases in a digital epoch. In F.Cameron, & S.Kenderdine (Eds.), Theorizing digital cultural heritage: A critical discourse (pp. 165192). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Canadian Heritage Information Network (CHIN). (1999). Like light through a prism: Analyzing commercial markets for cultural heritage content. Canadian Heritage Information Network (CHIN).
  • Christen, K. (2009). Access and accountability: The ecology of information sharing in the digital age. Anthropology News. 44.
  • Christen, K. (2005). Gone digital: Aboriginal remix and the cultural commons. International Journal of Cultural Property, 12, 315345.
  • Cox, R.J. et al, (2007) Machines in the Archives: Technology and the Coming Transformation of Archival Reference, First Monday 12: 11 (November 2007), http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2029/1894.
  • Digital humanities manifesto 2.0. (2009). (http://www.digitalhumanities.ucla.edu/images/stories/mellon_seminar_readings/manifesto20.pdf)
  • Dillman, D. A. (2000). Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Dryden, J. (2009). Copyright Issues in the Selection of Archival Material for Internet Access, Archival Science, 8: 2, 123147.
  • Dryden, J. (2008) Copyright in the Real World: Making Archival Material Available on the Internet. Unpublished Dissertation, Toronto: University of Toronto.
  • Duff, W.; Harris, V. (2002) “Stories and Names: Archival Descriptions as Narrating Records and Constructing Meanings,” Archival Science 2, no. 3–4.
  • Eschenfelder, K.R. (2009). Controlling Access To And Use Of Online Cultural Collections: A Survey Of U.S. Archives, Libraries And Museums For IMLS. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Library and Information Studies.
  • Eschenfelder, K.R. and Agnew, G. (2010) Technologies Employed to Control Access to or Use of Digital Cultural Collections: Controlled Online Collections. D-Lib Magazine (doi:10.1045/dlib.magazine)ISSN:1082–9873.
  • Fricker, R. D., & Schonlau, M. (2002). Advantages and disadvantages of internet research surveys: Evidence from the field. Field Methods, 14 (4), 347365.
  • Hamma, K. (2005). Public domain art in an age of easier mechanical reproducibility. First Monday, 11 (11)
  • Hirtle, P.B. (2003). Society Of American Archivists Presidential Address: Archives Or Assets? http://www.archivists.org/governance/presidential/hirtle.asp
  • Hirtle, P.B.; Donovan, T.C. (2009) Removing All Restrictions: Cornell's New Policy on Use of Public Domain Reproductions. Research Library Issues no. 266 (October): 1–6.
  • Hodson, S. S. (2004) In Secret Kept, In Silence Sealed: Privacy in the Papers of Authors and Celebrities, American Archivist 67: 2, p. 194211.
  • Hodson, Sara S. Archives on the Web: Unlocking Collections While Safeguarding Privacy, First Monday, 11: 8, August 7, 2006, http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/1389/1307.
  • Intrallect Inc. (2004). Digital Rights Management. Linlithgow, UK: Intrallect Ltd.
  • Kelley, K. B., Bonner, K. M., Lynch, C. A., & Park, J. (2006). Digital rights management (DRM) and higher education: Opportunities and challenges. In K.Bonner (Ed.), The Center for Intellectual Property Handbook (pp. 107121). New York: Neal-Schuman.
  • Krause, M.G.; Yakel, E. (2007) Interaction in Virtual Archives: The Polar Bear Expedition Digital Collections Next Generation Finding Aid, American Archivist 70: 2, p. 282314.
  • Lessig, L. (2008) Remix: Making Art and Commerce Thrive in a Hybrid Economy. New York: Penguin Press.
  • Max Planck Institute for the History of Science (January 11, 2008) Workshop Report: Scholarly Publishing and the Issues of Cultural Heritage, Fair Use, Reproduction Fees and Copyrights
  • Max Planck Institute for the History of Science. (2009). Best practices for access to images: Recommendations for scholarly use and publishing. Berlin: Max Plank Institute. Retrieved from http://www.mpiwg-berlin.mpg.de/PDF/MPIWGBestPracticesRecommendations.pdf
  • Mazzone, J. (2006). Copyfraud. New York University Law Review, 81 (3), 10261100.
  • National Initiative for a Networked Cultural Heritage. (2002). NINCH guide to good practice in digitization and management of cultural heritage materials. Washington DC: NINCH.
  • National Park Service. (2006). NPS museum handbook: Part I ethical issues, part III legal issues Washington DC: National Park Service. Retrieved from: Open Knowledge Foundation (http://www.okfn.org) Last accessed April 2010.
  • Pantalony, R. E. (2007) WIPO guide on Managing Intellectual Property for Museums. Geneva: WIPO
  • Public.Resource.Org. (May 19, 2007). Dear internet, RE: SmithsonianImages.SI.edu., January 2009, from http://public.resource.org/memo.2007.05.19.html
  • Rights and Reproductions Information Network (RARIN). (2004). AAM member museums rights and reproductions survey 2004. Washington DC: American Association of Museums.
  • Rinehart, R. (2006) Nailing down bits: Digital art and intellectual property. Canada: Canadian Heritage Information Network (CHIN).
  • Roosen-Runge, P.H.; Roosen-Runge, A.P. (2003). The virtual display case: Making museum assets safely visible (3rd edition) Canadian Heritage Information Network (CHIN) at http://dsp-psd.pwgsc.gc.ca/Collection/Co61-17-2003E.pdf, accessed 1 January 2010.
  • Ross, S.; Donnelly, M.; Dobreva, M. (2004) “Rights management and payment technologies.” DigiCULT:Emerging Technologies for the Cultural and Scientific Heritage Sector Technology Watch, 2 (2).
  • Schlosser, M. (2009). Unless otherwise indicated: A survey of copyright statements on digital library collections. College & Research Libraries, 70 (4), 371385.
  • Shilton, K., & Srinivasan, R. (2007). Participatory appraisal and arrangement for multicultural archival collections. Archivaria, 63, 87101.
  • Smithsonian Institution. (April 21, 2009). Smithsonian 2.0 forum webcast., July 2009, from http://smithsonian20.si.edu/forum.html
  • Smithsonian Institution (July 30, 2009) Smithsonian Institution Web and New Media Strategy Version 1.0 (http://smithsonian-webstrategy.wikispaces.com/file/view/20090729_Smithsonian-Web-New-Media-Strategy_v1.0.pdf
  • Srinivasan, R., Boast, R., Becvar, K. M., & Furner, J. (2009). Blobgects: Digital museum catalogs and diverse user communities. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 60 (4), 666678.
  • Tanner, S. (2004). Reproduction charging models & rights policy for digital images in american art museums. London: King's Digital Consultancy Service.
  • Tanner, S.; Deegan, M. (2003). Exploring charging models for digital library cultural heritage. Ariadne, 34
  • Town hall meeting on intellectual property: Museum image licensing – the next generation. (2007). Museum Computer Network Conference, Chicago
  • Trescott, J. (Dec 16, 2006) Smithsonian Deal With Showtime Passes Muster: GAO Finds Researchers' Access Is Unaffected. The Washington Post.
  • Walsh, P. (1997). The web and the unassailable voice. Museums and the Web: An International Conference, Los Angeles CA.
  • Wienand, P., Booy, A., & Fry, R. (2000). A Guide To Copyright For Museums And Galleries. London: Routledge.