• Bailey, C. W., Jr. (2010, April 12). Google Books bibliography. Retrieved May 20, 2010, from
  • Choudhury, G. S., DiLauro, T., Ferguson, R., Dorettboom, M., & Fujinaga, I. (2006). Document recognition for a million books. D-Lib Magazine, 12 (3).
  • Ciriaci, D., & Quaglione, D. (2009). Multilateral platforms and Google Book Search: Which competition after the settlement agreement? Industria: Rivista di economia e politica industriale, 30 (4), 647678.
  • Courant, P. N. (2006). Scholarship and academic libraries (and their kin) in the world of Google. First Monday, 11 (8).
  • Duguid, P. (2007). Inheritance and loss? A brief survey of Google Books. First Monday, 12 (8), 11 pp.
  • Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Grimmelmann, J. (2009). The Google Book Search settlement: Ends, means, and the future of books. Washington, DC: American Constitution Society.
  • Jeanneney, J.-N. (2006). Google and the myth of universal knowledge: A view from Europe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Kelly, K. (2006, May 14). Scan this book The New York Times.
  • Kousha, K., & Thelwall, M. (2009). Google Book Search: Citation analysis for social science and the humanities. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 60 (8), 15371549.
  • Langley, A., & Bloomberg, D. S. (2008). Google Books: Making the public domain universally accessible. In Proceedings of the SPIE – the international society for optical engineering (10 pp.).
  • Lavoie, B., Connaway, L. S., & Dempsey, L. (2005). Anatomy of aggregate collections: The example of Google Print for libraries. D-Lib Magazine, 11 (9).
  • Leetaru, K. (2008). Mass book digitization: The deeper story of Google Books and the Open Content Alliance. First Monday, 13 (10).
  • Martin, S. (2008). To Google or not to Google, that is the question: Supplementing Google Book Search to make it more useful for scholarship. Journal of Library Administration, 47 (1/2), 141150.
  • Miller, C. C. (2010). E-books top hardcovers at Amazon. New York Times, p. B1.
  • Mimno, D., & McCallum, A. (2007). Organizing the OCA: Learning faceted subjects from a library of digital books. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on digital libraries. Vancouver, BC: ACM.
  • Pinch, T., & Bijker, W. (1984). The social construction of facts and artefacts: Or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. Social Studies of Science, 14 (3), 399441.
  • Rieger, O. Y. (2008). Preservation in the age of large-scale digitization. Washington, DC: Council on Library and Information Resources.
  • Rosenblatt, B. (2005). Rights management and the revolution in e-publishing. INDICARE Monitor, 2 (9).
  • Roush, W. (2005). The infinite library. Technology Review, 108 (5), 5459.
  • Samuelson, P. (2010). Google Book Search and the future of books in cyberspace. Minnesota Law Review (forthcoming).
  • Sandler, M. (2005). Disruptive beneficence: The Google Print program and the future of libraries. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 10 (3–4), 522.
  • Shera, J. H. (1952). On the value of library history. The Library Quarterly, 22 (3), 240251.
  • Toobin, J. (2007, February 5). Google's moon shot: The quest for the universal library. The New Yorker.
  • van Dijk, A. (2005). Primary source publishers in a Googling world. Microform & Imaging Review, 34 (1), 3134.