SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Bucy, E. P. (2003). Media credibility reconsidered: Synergy effects between on-air and online news. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 80 (2), 247264.
  • Flanagin, A. J. & Metzger, M. J. (2000). Perceptions of Internet information credibility. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 77 (3), 515540.
  • Flanagin, A. J. & Metzger, M. J. (2003). The perceived credibility of personal Web page information as influenced by the sex of the source. Computers in Human Behavior, 19 (6), 683701.
  • Flanagin, A. J. & Metzger, M. J. (2008). Digital media and youth: Unparalleled opportunity and unprecedented responsibility. In M.Metzger, & A.Flanagin (Eds.), Digital media, youth, and credibility (pp. 527). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Fogg, B. J., Soohoo, C., Danielson, D. R., Marable, L., Stanford, J., & Tauber, E. R. (2003). How do users evaluate the credibility of Web sites? A study with over 2,500 participants. Proceedings of DUX2003, Designing for User Experiences Conference. (pp. 115). New York, NY: ACM.
  • Hilligoss, B. & Rieh, S. Y. (2008). Developing a unifying framework of credibility assessment: Construct, heuristics, and interaction in context. Information Processing and Management, 44 (4), 14671484.
  • Hovland, C. I., Janis, I. L., & Kelley, H. H. (1953). Communication and persuasion. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Johnson, T. J. & Kaye, B. K. (2000). Using is believing: The influence of reliance on the credibility of online political information among politically interested Internet users. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 77 (4), 865879.
  • Kubey, R., Larson, R., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Experience Sampling Method application to communication research questions. Journal of Communication, 46 (2), 99120.
  • Lankes, R. D. (2008). Credibility on the internet: Shifting from authority to reliability. Journal of Documentation, 64 (5), 667686.
  • Metzger, M., Flanagin, A. and Medders, R. B. (2009). Social and heuristic approaches to credibility evaluation online. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Communication Association. Retrieved May 25, 2010 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p298366_index.html.
  • Rieh, S. Y. (2002). Judgment of information quality and cognitive authority in the Web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53 (2), 145161.
  • Rieh, S. Y. (2010). Credibility and cognitive authority of information. In M.Bates, & M. N.Maack (Eds.) Encyclopedia of Library and Information Sciences, 3rd Ed. (pp. 13371344), New York: Taylor and Francis Group, LLC.
  • Rieh, S. Y. & Belkin, N. J. (1998). Understanding judgment of information quality and cognitive authority in the WWW. Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, 35, 279289.
  • Rieh, S. Y. & Hilligoss, B. (2008). College students' credibility judgments in the information seeking process. In M.Metzger, & A.Flanagin (Eds.), Digital media, youth, and credibility (pp. 4972). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Sundar, S. S. (1999). Exploring receivers' criteria for perception of print and online news. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 76 (2), Summer 1999, 373386.
  • Sundin, O. & Francke, H. (2009). In search of credibility: Pupils' information practices in learning environments. Information Research, 14 (4). Retrieved May 25, 2010 from http://informationr.net/ir/14–4/paper418.html.
  • U.S. Census Bureau. (2000). Michigan QuickFacts. Retrieved December 11, 2009 from: http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/26000.html.