SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Bishoff, L., & Allen, N. (2004). Business Planning for Cultural Heritage Institutions. Washington, DC: Council on Library and Information Resources. Retrieved August 2, 2010 from http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub124/contents.html.
  • Brockman, W. S., Neumann, L., Palmer, C. L., & Tidline, T. (2001). Scholarly Work in the Humanities and the Evolving Information Environment. Washington, DC: Digital Library Federation/Council on Library and Information Resources. Retrieved August 2, 2010 from http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub104/pub104.pdf.
  • Brogan, M. (2006). Contexts and Contributions: Building the Distributed Library. Washington, DC: Digital Library Federation/Council on Library and Information Resources. Retrieved August 2, 2010 from http://www.diglib.org/pubs/dlf106.
  • Buchanan, G., Cunningham, S. J., Blandford, A., Rimmer, J., & Warwick, C. (2005). Information seeking by humanities scholars. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Digital Libraries (Vienna, Austria, Sept. 18–23, 2005), 218229.
  • Buckland, M. K. (1999). Library Services in Theory and Context. (2nd ed.). New York: Pergamon Press. Retrieved August 2, 2010 from http://sunsite.berkeley.edu/Literature/Library/Services/index.html
  • Case, D. O. (1991). The collection and use of information by some American historians: A study of motives and methods. Library Quarterly, 61, 6182.
  • Ciula, A., & Lopez T. (2009). Reflecting on a dual publication: Henry III Fine Rolls print and web. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 24 (2), 129141. Retrieved August 2, 2010 from http://llc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/24/2/129.
  • Cole, T., Jackson, A. S., Palmer, C. L., Shreeves, S. L., Twidale, M. B., & Zavalina, O. L. (2006). Findings Pertaining to the Framework of Guidance for Building Good Digital Collections. White paper. Retrieved August 2, 2010 from http://hdl.handle.net/2142/722.
  • Currall, J., Moss, M., & Stuart, S. (2004). What is a collection? Archivaria, 58, 131146.
  • Dalton, M. S., & Charnigo, L. (2004). Historians and their information sources. College and Research Libraries, 65 (5), 400425.
  • Duff, W. M., & Johnson, C. A. (2002). Accidentally found on purpose: Information-seeking behaviors of historians in archives. Library Quarterly, 72 (4), 472496.
  • Ellis, D., & Oldman, H. (2005). The English literature researcher in the age of the Internet. Journal of Information Science, 31 (1), 2936.
  • Evans, G. E. (2005). Developing Library and Information Center Collections. (5th ed.). Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
  • Ferguson, A. W., Grant, J., & Rutstein, J. S. (1988). The RLG Conspectus: Its benefits and uses. College and Research Libraries, 49 (3), 197206.
  • Foulonneau, M., Cole, T. W., Habing, T. G., & Shreeves, S. L. (2005). Using collection descriptions to enhance an aggregation of harvested item-level metadata. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (Denver, CO, June 7–11, 2005), 3241.
  • Jewell, A. (2008–2009). Digital editions: Scholarly tradition in an avant-garde medium. Documentary Editing, 30 (3&4), 2835. Retrieved August 2, 2010 from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libraryscience/183.
  • Lee, H. L. (2000). What is a collection? Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51 (12), 11061113.
  • Palmer, C. L. (2004). Thematic research collections. In S.Schreibman, R.Siemens, & J.Unsworth (Eds.), A Companion to Digital Humanities (pp. 348365). Oxford: Blackwell. Retrieved August 2, 2010 from http://www.digitalhumanities.org/companion/index.html.
  • Palmer, C. L. (2005). Scholarly work and the shaping of digital access. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56 (11), 11401153.
  • Palmer, C.L., & Knutson, E. (2004). Metadata practices and implications for federated collections. In Proceedings of the 67th ASIS&T Annual Meeting (Providence, RI, Nov. 12–17, 2004).
  • Palmer, C. L., Teffeau, L. C., & Pirmann, C. M. (2009). Scholarly Information Practices in the Online Environment: Themes from the Literature and Implications for Library Service Development. Dublin, OH: OCLC Research and Programs.
  • Palmer, C.L., Zavalina, O.L., & Mustafoff, M. (2007). Trends in metadata practices: a longitudinal study of collection federation metadata. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (Vancouver, Canada, June 19–23, 2007), 386395.
  • Price, K. (2009). Edition, project, database, archive, thematic research collection: What's in a name? Digital Humanities Quarterly, 3 (3). Retrieved August 2, 2010 from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1068&context=englishfacpubs.
  • Rogers, B. M. (2008). The historical community and the digital future. In 3rd Annual James A. Rawley Graduate Conference in the Humanities, Imagining Communities: People, Places, Meanings. (Lincoln, NE, April 12, 2008). Retrieved August 2, 2010 from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1025&context=historyrawleyconference.
  • Shreeves, S. L., Knutson, E. M., Stvilia, B., Palmer, C. L., Twidale, M. B., & Cole, T. W. (2005). Is ‘quality’ metadata ‘shareable’ metadata? The implications of local metadata practice on federated collections. In Proceedings of the 12th National Conference of the Association of College and Research Libraries, (Minneapolis, MN, April 7–10, 2005), 223237.
  • Shreeves, S. L., Riley, J., & Milewicz, L. (2006). Moving towards sharable metadata. First Monday, 11 (8). Retrieved August 2, 2010 from http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/1386/1304.
  • Smith, M. N. (2004). Electronic scholarly editing. In S.Schreibman, R.Siemens, & J.Unsworth (Eds.), A Companion to Digital Humanities (pp. 306322). Oxford: Blackwell. Retrieved August 2, 2010 from http://www.Digitalhumanities.org/companion/index.html.
  • Tibbo, H. (2003). Primarily history in America: How U.S. historians search for primary materials at the dawn of the digital age. The American Archivist, 66 (1), 950.
  • Wood, R. (1992). A conspectus of the conspectus. Acquisitions Librarian, 4 (7), 523.
  • Zavalina, O. L. (2010). Collection-level Subject Access in Aggregations of Digital Collections: Metadata Application and Use. (Doctoral dissertation). Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois, 192 p. Retrieved August 2, 2010 from http://hdl.handle.net/2142/16620.
  • Zavalina, O.L., Palmer, C.L., Jackson, A.S., & Han, M.-J. (2008). Evaluating descriptive richness in collection-level metadata. Journal of Library Metadata, 8 (4), 263292.