SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Bishop, A.P. (1998). Digital libraries and knowledge disaggregation: The use of journal article components. In Digital Libraries 98: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM Conference on Digital Libraries (pp. 2939).
  • Bishop, A.P. (1999). Document structure and digital libraries: How researchers mobilize information in journal articles. Information Processing and Management, 35 (5), 255279.
  • Bishop, A.P., et al. (2000). Digital libraries: Situating use in changing information infrastructure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51 (4), 394413.
  • Brett, P. (1994). A genre analysis of the results section of sociology articles. English for Specific Purposes, 13 (1), 4759.
  • Breure, L. (2001). Development of the genre concept. Retrieved August 28, 2007 from http://people.cs.uu.nl/leen/GenreDev/GenreDevelopment.htm
  • Dillon, A. (2000). Spatial-semantics: How users derive shape from information space. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51 (6), 521528.
  • Dillon, A. (2004). Designing usable electronic text. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
  • Dillon, A., & Schaap, D. (1996). Expertise and the perception of shape in information. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 47 (10), 786788.
  • Dubois, B.L. (1997). The biomedical discussion section in context. Greenwich, CT: Ablex.
  • Harter, S.P. (1992). Psychological relevance and information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 43 (9), 602615.
  • Holmes, R. (1997). Genre analysis, and the social sciences: An investigation of the structure of research article discussion sections in three disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 16 (4), 321337.
  • Hopkins, A., & Dudley-Evans, T. (1988). A genre-based investigation of the discussion sections in articles and dissertations. English for Specific Purposes, 7 (2), 113121.
  • Kanoksilapatham, B. (2005). Rhetorical structure of biochemistry research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 24 (5), 269292.
  • King, D.W., & Tenopir, C. (1999). Using and reading scholarly literature. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 34, 423477.
  • Lewin, B.A., Fine, J., & Young, L. (2001). Expository discourse: A genre-based approach to social science research texts. London: Continuum.
  • Nwogu, K.N. (1997). The medical research paper: Structure and functions. English for Specific Purposes, 16 (2), 119138.
  • Sandusky, R.J., & Tenopir, C. (2008). Finding and using journal-article components: Impacts of disaggregation on teaching and research practice. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59 (6), 970982.
  • Saracevic, T. (2007). Relevance: A review of the literature and a framework for thinking on the notion in information science. Part II: Nature and manifestations of relevance. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58 (13), 19151933.
  • Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance: Communication and cognition. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Swales, J.M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Swales, J.M. (2004). Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Taylor, R.S. (1991). Information use environments. In B.Dervin & M.J.Voigt (Eds.), Progress in Communication Sciences. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. 10, 217255.
  • Tenopir, C. (2003). Use and users of electronic library resources: An overview and analysis of recent research studies. Washington, DC: Council on Library and Information Resources.
  • Tenopir, C., et al. (2009a). Electronic journals and changes in scholarly article seeking and reading patterns. Aslib Proceedings: New Information Perspectives, 61 (1), 532.
  • Tenopir, C., et al. (2009b). Variations in article seeking and reading patterns of academics: What makes a difference? Library & Information Science Research, 31 (3), 139148.
  • Thompson, D.K. (1993). Arguing for experimental facts in science: A study of research article results sections in biochemistry. Written communication, 10 (1), 106128.
  • Unger, C. (2002). Cognitive-pragmatic explanations of socio-pragmatic phenomena: The case of genre. EPICS I Symposium.
  • Unger, C. (2006). Genre, relevance, and global coherence: The pragmatics of discourse type. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Vaughan, M.W., & Dillon, A. (1998). The role of genre in shaping our understanding of digital documents. Proceedings of 61st Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, 559566.
  • White, H.D. (2007). Combining bibliometrics, information retrieval, and relevance theory. Part I: First examples of a synthesis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58 (4), 536559.
  • Wilson, D., & Sperber, D. (2004). Relevance theory. In L.R.Horn & G.Ward (Eds.), The handbook of pragmatics (pp. 607632). Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Wilson, T.D. (1994). Information needs and uses: Fifty years of progress? In B.C.Vickery (Ed.), Fifty years of information progress: A journal of documentation review (pp. 1551). London: Aslib.
  • Yus, F. (2007). Weblogs: Web pages in search of a genre? In S.Posteguillo, M.J.Esteve & M.L.Gea-Valor (Eds.), The texture of Internet: Netlinguistics in progress (pp. 118142). Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.