• Baker, K. S., & Yarmey, L. (2008). Data Stewardship: Environmental Data Curation and a Web-of-Repositories. 4th International Digital Curation Conference. Edinburgh, Scotland.
  • Berg, M., & Goorman, E. (1999). The contextual nature of medical information. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 56(1-3), 5160.
  • Birnholtz, J. P., & Bietz, M. (2003). Data at Work: Supporting Sharing in Science and Engineering. ACM Conference on Supporting Group Work (pp. 339348). Sanibel Island, FL.
  • Carlson, S., & Anderson, B. (2007). What Are Data? The Many Kinds of Data and Their Implications for Data Re-Use. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(2), 635651.
  • Cragin, M. H., & Shankar, K. (2006). Scientific Data Collections and Distributed Collective Practice. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 15(2-3), 185204.
  • Faniel, I. M., & Jacobsen, T. E. (2010). Reusing Scientific Data: How Earthquake Engineering Researchers Assess the Reusability of Colleagues’ Data. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 19, 355375.
  • Faniel, I., & Yakel, E. (2011). Significant properties as contextual metadata. Journal of Library Metadata, 11(3-4), 155165.
  • Jirotka, M., Procter, R., Hartswood, M., Slack, R., Simpson, A., Coopmans, C., Hinds, C., et al. (2005). Collaboration and Trust in Healthcare Innovation: The eDiaMoND CaseStudy. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 14, 369398.
  • Karasti, H., Baker, K. S., & Halkola, E. (2006). Enriching the Notion of Data Curation in E-Science: Data Managing and Information Infrastructuring in the Long Term Ecological Research (LTER) Network. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 2006, 321358.
  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press.
  • National Science Board. (2005). Long-lived Digital Data Collections: Enabling Research and Education in the 21st Century. Washington, D.C.: National Science Foundation.
  • Palmer, C. L. (1996). Information work at the boundaries of science: Linking Library services to research practices. Library Trends, 45(2), 165191.
  • Pierce, S. J. (1999). Boundary crossing in research literatures as a means of interdisciplinary information transfer. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(3), 271279.
  • Schiff, L. R., Van House, N. A., & Butler, M. H. (1997). Understanding complex information environments: a social analysis of watershed planning. Proceedings of the second ACM international conference on Digital libraries, DL ‘97 (pp. 161168). New York, NY, USA: ACM.
  • Van House, N.A., Butler, M. H., & Schiff, L. R. (1998). Cooperative Knowledge Work and Practices of Trust: Sharing Environmental Planning Data Sets. The ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 335343). Seattle, Washington.
  • Van House, N. A. (2002). Digital libraries and practices of trust: Networked biodiversity information. Social Epistemology: A Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Policy, 16(1), 99.
  • Wallis, J. C., Milojevic, S., Borgman, C. L., & Sandoval, W. A. (2006). The Special Case of Scientific Data Sharing with Education. The American Society for Information Science & Technology (Vol. 43, pp. 169181).
  • Weeks, P., & Packard, J. M. (1997). Acceptance of Scientific Management by Natural Resource Dependent Communities. Conservation Biology, 11(1), 236245.
  • Zimmerman, A. (2007). Not by metadata alone: The use of diverse forms of knowledge to locate data for reuse. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 7, 516.
  • Zimmerman, A. S. (2008). New Knowledge from Old Data: The Role of Standards in the Sharing and Reuse of Ecological Data. Science, Technology & Human Values, 33(5), 631652.