SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • American Cancer Society. (2009). Breast cancer facts & figures 2009–2010. Atlanta: American Cancer Society, Inc. Retrieved from http://www.cancer.org/acs/groups/content/@nho/documents/f861009final908pdf.pdf
  • American Cancer Society. (2012). Cancer facts & figures 2012. Atlanta: American Cancer Society, Inc. Retrieved from http://www.cancer.org/Research/CancerFactsFigures/CancerFactsFigures/cancer-facts-figures-2012
  • Allen, J. D., Savadatti, S., & Levy, A. G. (2009). The transition from breast cancer “patient” to “survivor.” Psycho-Oncology, 18, 7178.
  • Anderson, J. G., Rainey, M. R., & Eysenbach, G. (2003). The impact of cyberhealthcare on the physician-patient relationship. Journal of Medical Systems, 21(1), 6784.
  • Beatty, L., Oxlad, M., Koczwara, B., & Wade, T. D. (2008) The psychosocial concerns and needs of women recently diagnosed with breast cancer: A qualitative study of patient, nurse and volunteer perspectives. Health Expectations, 11, 331342.
  • Beaver, K., Twomey, M., Witham, G., Foy, S., & Luker, K. A. (2006). Meeting the information needs of women with needs of womebreast cancer: Piloting a nurse-led intervention. European Journal of Oncology Nursing, 10, 378390.
  • Boyer, C., Provost, M., Baujard, V. (2002). Highlights on the 8th HON survey health and medical Internet users. Geneva: Health on the Net Foundation.
  • Brashers, D. E., Goldsmith, D. J., & Hsieh, E. (2002). Information seeking and avoiding in health contexts. Human Communication Research, 28(2), 258271.
  • Brubaker J.R., Lustig C., Hayes G.R. (2010). PatientsLikeMe: Empowerment and representation in a patient-centered social network. Presented at the CSCW 2010 workshop on CSCW research in healthcare: Past, present, and future, Savannah, GA.
  • Case, D. O. (2007). Looking for information: A survey of research on information seeking, needs, and behavior (2nd ed.). London, England: Elsevier.
  • Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage.
  • Chen, X., Siu, L.L. (2001). Impact of the media and the Internet on oncology: Survey of cancer patients and oncologies in Canada. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 19, 42914297.
  • Civan, A., McDonald, D.W., Unruh, K.T., & Pratt, W. (2009). Locating patient expertise in everyday life. Proceedings of the ACM 2009 International Conference on Support Group Work (Group '09), Sanibel Island, Florida. DOI: 10.1145/1531674.1531718.
  • Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Dervin, B. (1983). An overview of sense-making: Concepts, methods, and results to date. Paper presented at the International Communication Association Annual Meeting, May, Dallas, TX. Retrieved from http://faculty.washington.edu/wpratt/MEBI598/Methods/An%20Overview%20of%20Sense-Making%20Research%201983a.htm
  • Dervin, B. (2003). Chaos, order, and sense-making: A proposed theory for information design. In B. Dervin & L. Foreman-Wernet (with E. Lauterbach) (Eds.) Sense-Making Methodology reader: Selected writings of Brenda Dervin (pp. 325340). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
  • Duggan, A. (2006). Understanding interpersonal communication processes across health contexts: Advances in the last decade and challenges for the next decade. Journal of Health Communication, 11, 93108.
  • Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (1995). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Erdelez, S. (1999). Information encountering: It's more than just bumping into information. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, February/March, 2529.
  • Fogel, J. A., Albert, S. M., Schnabel, F., Ditkoff, B. A., & Neugut A.I. (2002). Use of the Internet by women with breast cancer. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 4(2). Retrieved from http://www.jmir.org/2002/2/e9/.
  • Fox, S. (2011). Peer to peer health care (Pew Internet and American Life Project). Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/∼/media//Files/Reports/2011/Pew_P2PHealthcare_2011.pdf.
  • Frost, J. H., & Massagli, M. P. (2008). Social uses of personal health information within PatientsLikeMe, an online patient community: What can happen when patients have access to one another's data. Journal of the Medical Internet Research, 10(3). Retrieved from http://www.jmir.org/2008/3/e15/.
  • Garcia, M., Jemal, A., Ward, E. M., Center, M. M., Hao, Y., Siegel, R. L. et al. (2007). Global cancer facts & figures 2007. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society. Retrieved from http://www.cancer.org/acs/groups/content/@nho/documents/document/globalsfactsandfigures2007rev2p.pdf.
  • Glaser, B. G. (1965). The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Social Problems, 12(4), 436445.
  • Goldsmith, D. J. (2004). Communicating social support. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Gustafson, D. H., Hawkins, R., Pingree, S., McTavish, F., Arora, N. K., Mendenhall, J., et al. (2001). Effect of computer support on younger women with breast cancer. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 16, 435445.
  • Hartzler, A., & Pratt, W. (2011). Managing the personal side of health: How patient expertise differs from the expertise of clinicians. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 13(3). Retrieved online at http://www.jmir.org/2011/3/e62/.
  • Høybe, M. T., Johansen, C., & Thørnhøj-Thomsen, T. (2005). Online interaction: Effects of storytelling in an Internet breast cancer support group. Psycho-Oncology, 14, 211220.
  • Jenkins, V., Fallowfield, L., Saul, J. (2001). Information needs of patients with cancer: Results from a large study in UK cancer centres. British Journal of Cancer, 84, 4851.
  • Johnson, J. D., & Andrews, J. E. (2012). The evolving role of consumers. In R. L. Richesson, & J. E. Andrews (Eds.), Clinical Research Informatics. London: Springer.
  • Andrews (eds.), Clinical Research Informatics. London: Springer.
  • Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A. (2002). Internet paradox revisited. Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 4974.
  • Lieberman, M. A., & Goldstein, B. A. (2005). Self-help online: An outcome evaluation of breast cancer bulletin boards. Journal of Health Psychology, 10(6), 855862.
  • Lieberman, M. A., Golant, M., Giese-Davis, J., Winzlenberg [sic], A., Benjamin, H., Humphreys, K., et al. (2003). Electronic support groups for breast carcinoma: A clinical trial of effectiveness. Cancer, 97(4), 920925.
  • Lin, N. (1986). Conceptualizing social support. In N. Lin, A. Dean, & W. M. Ensel (Eds.). Social support, life events, and depression (pp. 1730). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
  • Maloney-Krichmar, D., & Preece, J. (2005). A multilevel analysis of sociability, usability, and community dynamics in an online health community. ACM Transactions on Human Interaction, 12(2), 132.
  • McMullan, M. (2006). Patients using the Internet to obtain health information: How this affects the patient-health professional relationship. Patient Education and Counseling, 63, 2428. Retrieved from http://www.hon.ch/Survey/8th_HON_results.html.
  • Moumjid, N., Charles, C., Morelle, M., Gafni, A., Bremond, A., Farsi, F., et al. (2009). The statutory duty of physicians to inform patients versus unmet patients' information needs: The case of breast cancer in France. Health Policy, 91(2), 162173. Farsi, F., et al. (2009).
  • Neal, D. M., & McKenzie, P. J. (2011). Putting the pieces together: Endometriosis blogs, cognitive authority, and collaborative information behavior. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 99(2), 127134. DOI: 10.3163/1536-5050.99.2.004.
  • O'Leary, K. A., Estabrooks, C. A., Olson, K., & Cumming, C. (2007). Information acquisition for women facing surgical treatment for breast cancer: Influencing factors and selected outcomes. Patient Education and Counseling, 69, 519.
  • Orgad, S. (2005). The transformative potential of online communication: The case of breast cancer patients' Internet spaces. Feminist Media Studies, 5(2), 141161.
  • Preece, J. (1999). Empathic communities: Balancing emotional and factual communication. Interacting with Computers, 12, 6377.
  • Radin, P. (2006). “To me, it's my life”: Medical communication, trust, and activism in cyberspace. Social Science & Medicine, 62, 591601.
  • Rees, C. E., & Bath, P. A. (2000). The information needs and source preferences of women with breast cancer and their family members: A review of the literature published between 1988 and 1998. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 31(4), 833841.
  • Rees, C. E., & Bath, P. A. (2001). Information-seeking behaviors of women with breast cancer. Oncology Nursing Forum, 28(5), 899907.
  • Rubenstein, E. (2009). Dimensions of information exchange in an online breast cancer support group. Proceedings of the annual meeting of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, November 6-11, Vancouver, BC.
  • Rubenstein, E. L. (2011). “It's a microcosm of life”: Weaving a web of information and support in an online breast cancer community. (Unpublished dissertation.) University of Illinois, Urbana, IL.
  • Savolainen, R. (2008). Source preferences in the context of seeking problem-specific information. Information Processing & Management, 44, 274293.
  • Shaw, B. R., Hawkins, R., Arora, N., McTavish, F., Pingree, S., & Gustafson, D. H. (2006). An exploratory study of predictors of participation in a computer support group for women with breast cancer. Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 24(1), 1827.
  • Shaw, B. R., McTavish, F., Hawkins, R., Gustafson, D. H., & Pingree, S. (2000). Experiences of women with breast cancer: Exchanging social support over the CHESS computer network. Journal of Health Communication, 5, 135159.
  • Souden, M. (2008). Information work in the chronic illness experience. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Information Science and Technology, October 24-28, Columbus, OH.
  • Souden, M., & Durrance, J. C. (2011). Information use in chronic illness care: The role of the electronic health record in bridging patient experience and healthcare contexts. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Information Science & Technology, October 9-13, New Orleans, LA.
  • Talosig-Garcia, M., & Davis, S. W. (2005). Information-seeking behavior of minority breast cancer patients: An exploratory study. Journal of Health Communication, 10, 5364.
  • Veinot, T. C. (2009). Interactive acquisition and sharing: Understanding the dynamics of HIV/AIDS information networks. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(11), 23132332.
  • Veinot, T. C. (2010). “We have a lot of information to share with each other.” Understanding the value of peer-based health information exchange. InformationResearch, 15(4). Retrieved from http://InformationR.net/ir/15-4/paper452.html.
  • Vogel, B. A., Bengel, J., & Helmes, A. W. (2008). Information and decision making: Patients' needs and experiences in the course of breast cancer and treatment. Patient Education and Counseling, 71, 7985.
  • Williams, M. V., Davis, T., Parker, R. M., & Weiss, B. D. (2002). The role of health literacy in patient-physician communication. Family Medicine, 34(5), 383389.
  • Williamson, K. (2005). Where one size does not fit all: Understanding the needs of potential users of a portal to breast cancer knowledge online. Journal of Health Communication, 10, 567580.
  • Winzelberg, A. J., Classen, C., Alpers, G. W., Roberts, H., Koopman, C., Adams, R. E., et al. (2003). Evaluation of an internet support group for women with primary breast cancer. Cancer, 97(5), 11641173.