SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Boykoff, M. T., & Boykoff, J. M. (2004). Balance as bias: Global warming and the US prestige press. Global Environmental Change, 14, 125136.
  • Budd, J. M. (2007). Information, analysis, and ideology: A case study of science and the public interest. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(14), 23662371.
  • Carvalho, A. (2007). Ideological cultures and media discourses on scientific knowledge: Re-reading news on climate change. Public Understanding of Science, 16(2), 223243.
  • Check with climate scientists for views on climate (1 February 2012). The Wall Street Journal. from http://global.factiva.com/.
  • Hulme, M., & Mahony, M. (2010). Climate change: What do we know about the IPCC? Progress in Physical Geography, 34(5), 705718.
  • Knorr-Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Latour, B. (1986). Laboratory life: the construction of scientific facts. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
  • Leiserowitz, A. A., Maibach, E. W., Roser-Renouf, C, Smith, N., & Dawson, E. (2010). Climategate, public opinion, and the loss of trust [Working paper]. Unpublished manuscript.
  • Marquart-Pyatt, S. T., Shwom, R. L., Dietz, T., Dunlap, R. E., Kaplowitz, S. A., McCright, A. M., et al. (2011). Understanding public opinion on climate change: A call for research. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 53(4), 3842.
  • McCright, A. M., & Dunlap, R. E. (2000). Challenging global warming as a social problem: An analysis of the conservative movement's counter-claims. Social Problems, 47(7), 499522.
  • McCright, A. M., & Dunlap, R. E. (2003). Defeating Kyoto: The conservative movement's impact on U.S. climate change policy. Social Problems, 50(3), 348373.
  • Miller, C. (2001). Hybrid Management: Boundary Organizations, Science Policy, and Environmental Governance in the Climate Regime. Science, Technology & Human Values, 26(4), 478500.
  • Newman, M. E. J. (2001). Scientific collaboration networks. I. Network construction and fundamental results. Physical Review E, 64(1), 016131.
  • No need to panic about global warming; there's no compelling scientific argument for drastic action to ‘decarbonize’ the world's economy (27 January 2012). The Wall Street Journal. from http://global.factiva.com/.
  • Persson, O. D., Danell, R., & Wiborg Schneider, J. (2009). How to use Bibexcel for various types of bibliometric analysis. In F. Aström, R. Danell, B. Larsen & J. Schneider (Eds.), Celebrating scholarly communication studies: A Festschrift for Olle Persson at his 60th Birthday (pp. 924). Leuven, Belgium: International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics.
  • Ryghaug, M., & Skjølsvold, T. M. (2010). The Global Warming of Climate Science: Climategate and the Construction of Scientific Facts. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 24(3), 287307.
  • Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional Ecology, Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387420.
  • Van House, N. A. (2003). Digital libraries and collaborative knowledge construction. In A. P. Bishop, N. A. Van House & B. P. Buttenfield (Eds.), Digital library use: Social practice in design and evaluation (pp. 271293). Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
  • Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F., & Uzzi, B. (2007). The increasing cominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 3/5(5827), 10361039.
  • Zia, A., & Todd, A. M. (2010). Evaluating the effects of ideology on public understanding of climate change science: How to improve communication across ideological divides? Public Understanding of Science, 19(6), 743761.