SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Anderson, T. (2007). Settings, arenas and boundary objects: Socio-material framings of information practices. Information Research, 12 (4), paper colis10. Retrieved January 24, 2008, from http://InformationR.net/ir/12–4/colis/colis10.html
  • Barad, K. (1998). Getting real: Technoscientific practices and the materialization of reality. Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, 10 (2), 87128.
  • Bolter, J. D., & Grusin, R. (2000). Remediation: Understanding new media Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1996). The social life of documents. First Monday, 1 (1). Retrieved January 24, 2008, from http://www.firstmonday.org/ISSUES/issue1/documents/
  • Buckland, M. (1997). What is a document? Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48 (9), 804809.
  • Francke, H. (2008). (Re)creations of scholarly journals: Document and information architecture in open access journals Borås, Sweden: Valfrid.
  • Frohmann, B. (2004). Deflating information: From science studies to documentation Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
  • Ito, M. & Okabe, D. (2005). Technosocial situations: Emergent structuring of mobile e-mail use. In M.Ito, D.Okabe & MMatsude (Eds.), Personal, portable, pedestrian: Mobile phones in Japanese life, 257273. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  • Kling, R. (2000). Learning about information technologies and social change: The contribution of social informatics. The Information Society, 16, 217232.
  • Knorr Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Latour, B. (1992). Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artifacts. In W. E.Bijker & J. L.Bijker (Eds.), Shaping technology, building society: Studies in sociotechnical change, 225258. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (1965). Phenomenology of perception London: Routledge.
  • Miller, C. (1984). Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70, 15167.
  • Savolainen, R. (2007). Information behaviour and information practice: Reviewing the ‘umbrella concepts’ of information seeking studies. Library Quarterly, 77 (2), 109132.
  • Schutz, A. (1972). The phenomenology of the social world London: Heinemann Educational Books.
  • Shapin, S. (1994). A social history of truth: Civility and science in seventeenth-century England Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Star, S. L. & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, ‘translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science, 19 (3), 387420.
  • Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Talja, S. & Hartel, J. (2007). Revisiting the user-centred turn in information science research: An intellectual history perspective. Information Research, 12 (4) paper colis04. Retrieved January 24, 2008, from http://InformationR.net/ir/12–4/colis/colis04.html
  • Weight, J. (2006). I, apparatus, you: A technosocial introduction to creative practice. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 12 (4), 413446.
  • Wilson, P. (1983). Second-hand knowledge: An inquiry into cognitive authority Westport, CT & London: Greenwood Press.