SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Chatman, S. B. (1978). Story and discourse: narrative structure in fiction and film. Cornell University Press.
  • Goodrum, A. (2001). Multidimensional scaling of video surrogates. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52 (2): 174182.
  • Hughes, A. et al. (2003). Text or pictures? An eye-tracking study of how people view digital video surrogates. In Proceedings of CIVR 2003 (pp. 271280).
  • Kim, H. H. (2007). An experimental study on the effectiveness of storyboard surrogates in the meanings extraction of digital video. Journal of the Korean Society for information Management, 24 (4): 5372.
  • Lyer, H. and Lewis, C. D. (2007). Prioritization strategies for video storyboard keyframes. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58 (5): 629644.
  • Marchionini, G., Wildemuth, B. M., and Geisler, G. (2006). The Open Video Digital Library: A Möbius strip of research and practice, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57 (12): 16291643.
  • Song, Y. and Marchionini, G. (2007). Effects of audio and visual surrogates for making sense of digital video. Proceedings of CHI 2007, San Jose, CA, USA. pp. 867876.
  • Stachowicz, C. (2002). The effectiveness of storyboard surrogates in the subject indexing of digital video. Master's Degree Thesis, Univ. of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
  • Wildemuth, B. M. et al. (2002). Alternative surrogates for video objects in a digital library: Users' perspectives on their relative usability. Proceedings of the 6th European Conference on Digital Libraries (pp. 493507), New York: Springer.
  • Yang, M. & Marchionini, G. (2004). Exploring Users' Video Relevance Criteria – A Pilot Study. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Information Science and Technology (pp. 229238), Nov. 12–17, 2004. Providence, RI.