• Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice Hall.
  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The Exercise of control. NY: New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.
  • Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 126.
  • Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19 (2), 189211.
  • Eastin, M. S., & LaRose, R. (2000). Internet self-efficacy and the psychology of the digital divide. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 6 (1). Available at
  • Gaziano, C., & McGrath, K. (1986). Measuring the concept of credibility. Journalism Quarterly, 63, 451462.
  • Hilligoss, B., & Rieh, S. Y. (In press). Developing a unifying framework of credibility assessment: Concept, heuristics, and interaction in context. Information Processing and Management.
  • Katz, E., Blumler, J. G., & Gurevitch, M. (1973). Uses and gratifications research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 37 (4), 509523.
  • Kelton, K., Fleischmann, K., & Wallace, W. (2008). Trust in digital information. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59 (3), 363374.
  • LaRose, R., & Eastin, M. S. (2004). A Social cognitive theory of Internet uses and gratifications: Toward a new model of media attendance. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 48 (3), 358377.
  • Rieh, S. Y., & Hilligoss, B. (2007). College students' credibility judgments in the information seeking process. MetzgerM., & A.Flanagin (Editors), Digital media, youth, and credibility. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Stafford, T. F., & Gonier, D. (2004). What Americans like about being online. Communications of the ACM, 47 (11), 107112.
  • Tsfati, Y., & Cappella, J. N. (2005). Why do people watch news they do not trust? The need for cognition as a moderator in the association between news media skepticism and exposure. Media Psychology, 7, 251171.
  • Warnick, B. (2004). Online ethos: Source credibility on an “Authorless” environment. American Behavioral Scientist, 48 (2), 256265.