SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Ames, M. and Naaman, M. (2007). Why We Tag: Motivations for Annotation in Mobile and Online Media. In Proceedings of CHI-07. Retrieved March 7, 2008 from http://yahooresearchberkeley.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/02/chi2007-Ames-whyWeTag.pdf.
  • Angus, E., Thelwall, M., and Stuart, D. (2008). General patterns of tag usage among university groups in Flickr. Online Information Review 32(1), 89101. Retrieved November 12, 2008 from Emerald Insight.
  • Casey, M. E., and Savanstinuk, L. C. (September 2006). Library 2.0. Library Journal, 131(14). Retrieved January 1, 2009, from ABI/Inform Global database.
  • Gordon-Murnane, L. (2006). Social bookmarking, folksonomies, and Web 2.0 tools. Searcher, 14(6), 2638. Retrieved March 7, 2008 from Academic OneFile via Gale.
  • Golder, S. A. and Huberman, B. A. (2006). Usage patterns of collaborative tagging systems. Journal of Information Science, 32(2), 198208. Retrieved Feburary 10, 2008 from Library Literature.
  • Grant, C. D. (2006) A phenomenologial framework for the relationship between the semantic web and user-centered tagging systems. In J. Furner and J. Tennis (Ed.) Proceedings 17th Workshop of the American Society for Information Science and Technology Special Interest Group in Classification Research 17. Retrieved February 13, 2008 from http://dlist.sir.arizona.edu/1838/.
  • Hammond, T., Hannay, T., Lund, B., and Scott, J. (April, 2005) Social bookmarking tools (I). D-Lib Magazine, 11(4). Retrieved February 10, 2008 from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/april05/hammond/04hammond.html.
  • Kipp, M. E. (2006) Complementary or Discrete Contexts in Online Indexing: A Comparison of User, Creator and Intermediary Keywords. In Proceedings Canadian Association for Information Science. Retrieved February 10, from: http://dlist.sir.arizona.edu/1533/.
  • Kipp, M. E. (2007). Tagging for health information organisation and retrieval. In Proceedings of the 2007 Conference on Digital Libraries, 485-485. Retrieved February 10, 2008 from ACM Digital Library.
  • Kipp, M. E. and Campbell, D. G. (2006). Patterns and inconsistencies in collaborative tagging systems: An examination of tagging practices. In Proceedings of the ASIST Annual Meeting. Retrieved February 29, 2008 from: http://eprints.rclis.org/archive/00008315/.
  • Library of Congress (n.d.) Library of Congress Classification Outline. Retrieved April 22, 2008 from http://www.loc.gov/catdir/cpso/lcco/.
  • LibraryThing (n.d.a). About LibraryThing. Retrieved May 29, 2009 from http://www.librarything.com/about.
  • LibraryThing (n.d.b) Zeitgeist Overview. Retrieved May 29, 2009 from http://www.librarything.com/zeitgeist.
  • Lin, X., Beaudoin, J. E., Bui, Y., and Desai, K. (2006). Exploring characteristics of social classification. In Proceedings 17th Workshop of the American Society for Information Science and Technology Special Interest Group in Classification Research. Retrieved March 7, 2008, from http://dlist.sir.arizona.edu/1790/.
  • Marlow, C., Naaman, M., Boyd, Kd., and Davis, M. (2006). HT06, Tagging Paper, Taxonomy, Flickr, Academic Article, ToRead. In Proceedings of the 17th Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia(pp. 3140). New York, NY: ACM. Retrieved March 7, 2008, from ACM Digital Library.
  • Munk, T. B. and Mork, K. (2007a). Folksonomy, the power law & the significance of the least effort. Knowledge Organization, 34(1), 1633.
  • Noruzi, A. (2007). Folksonomies: Why do we need controlled vocabulary? Webology, 4(2). Retrieved January 2, 2009, from http://www.webology.ir/2007/v4n2/editorial12.html.
  • Peterson, E. (April 2008). Parallel Systems: The coexistence of subject cataloging and folksonomy. Library Philosophy and Practice 2008. Retrieved December 1, 2008, from http://www.webpages.uidaho.edu/-mbolin/e-peterson3.htm.
  • Sen, S., Lam, S. K., Rashid, A. M., Cosley, D., Frankowski, D., Osterhouse, J., Harper, F. M., and Riedl J. (2006). tagging, communities, vocabulary, evolution. In Proceedings of the 2006 20th Anniversary Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work(pp. 181190). New York, NY: ACM. Retrieved March 7, 2008 from ACM Digital Library.
  • Smith, T. (2007). Cataloging and you: Measuring the efficacy of a folksonomy for subject analysis. In Proceedings 18th Workshop of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, SIG Classification Research. Retrieved March 25, 2008 from http://dlist.sir.arizona.edu/2061/.
  • Spietri, L. F. (2006). The use of folksonomies in public library catalogues. The Serials Librarian, 52(2), 7589.
  • Spietri, L. F. (2007). Structure and form of folksonomy tags: The raod to the public library catalog. Webology, 4(2). Retrieved May 18, 2009, from http://webology.ir/2007/v4n2/a41.html.
  • Vander Wal, T. (February 2, 2007). Folksonomy coinage and definition. VanderWal.net. Retrieved April 24, 2008 from: http://vanderwal.net/folksonomy.html.
  • Vander Wal, T. (August 30, 2007). A stale state of tagging? VanderWal.net. Retrieved, March 16, 2008 from: http://www.vanderwal.net/random/entrysel.php?blog=1945.
  • Voss, J. (2007). Tagging, folksonomy & co-renaissance of manual indexing. In Proceedings of the International Symposium of Information Science(pp.234-254). Retrieved February 15, 2008 from http://arxiv.org/abs/cs/0701072v2.
  • Weber, J. (2006). Folksonomy and controlled vocabulary in LibraryThing. Unpublished student paper. University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Retrieved March 25, 2008 from http://jonathanweber.info/samples/2452-Folksonomy.pdf.
  • WikiThing: LibraryThings Wiki (n.d.a). LTFL: Libraries using LibraryThing for Libraries. Retrieved April 24, 2008 from http://www.librarything.com/wiki/index.php/LTFL:Libraries_using_LibraryThing_for_Libraries.