• Bates, M. J. (1989). The Design of Browsing and Berrypicking Techniques for the Online Search Interface. Online Review. 13(5), 407424.
  • Belkin, N. J. (1980). Anomalous states of knowledge as a basis for information retrieval. Canadian Journal of Information Science, 5 (1980), 133143.
  • Borlund, P. (2000). Experimental components for the evaluation for interactive information retrieval systems. Journal of Documentation, 56(1), 7190.
  • Doms, A., & Schroeder, M. (2005). GoPubMed: exploring PubMed with the Gene Ontology. Nucleic Acids Research. 33 (Web Server issue), 783786.
  • Dumais, S. T. & Belkin, N. J. (2005). The TREC interactive tracks: Putting the user into search. In E. M. V. D. K.Harman (Ed.), TREC: Experiment and evaluation in information retrieval, 123153. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Efthimiadis, E. N. (2000). Interactive query expansion: A user-based evaluation in a relevance feedback environment. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(11), 9891003.
  • Goetz T, & von der Lieth C W. (2005). PubFinder: a tool for improving retrieval rate of relevant PubMed abstracts. Nucleic Acids Research. 33 (Web Server issue), 774778.
  • Hearst, M., Elliott, A., English, J., Sinha, R., Swearingen, K., & Yee, K.-P. (2002). The Consumer Side of Search – Finding the Flow in Web Site Search. Communications of the ACM. 45(9), 42.
  • Hersh, W., Turpin, A., Price, S., Kraemer, D., Chan, B., Sacherek, L., et al. (2000). Do Batch and User Evaluations Give the Same Results? An Analysis from the TREC-8 Interactive Track. NIST Special Publication. (500), 531540.
  • Jansen, B. J., Spink, A., & Saracevic, T. (2000). Real Life, Real Users, and Real Needs: A Study and Analysis of User Queries on the Web. Information Processing & Management. 36(2), 207227.
  • Joho, H., & Jose, J. M. (2006). Slicing and dicing the information space using local contexts. In IIiX: Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Information interaction in context, (pp. 6674). New York, NY, USA: ACM Press.
  • Kekäläinen, J., & Järvelin, K. (2002). Evaluating information retrieval systems under the challenges of interaction and multidimensional dynamic relevance. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the CoLIS 4 Conference, Greenwood Village, Colo.
  • Lagergren, E., & Over, P. (1998). Comparing interactive information retrieval systems across sites: the TREC-6 interactive track matrix experiment. Paper presented at The 21st Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Lin, X. (1999). Visual MeSH. Paper presented at The 22nd International Conferences on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Berkeley, CA.
  • Plikus, M., Zhang, Z., & Chuong, C. -M. (2006). PubFocus: semantic MEDLINE/PubMed citations analytics through integration of controlled biomedical dictionaries and ranking algorithm. BMC Bioinformatics, 7(1), 424.
  • Perez-Iratxeta C, Bork P., Andrade, M. A. (2001). XplorMed: a tool for exploring MEDLINE abstracts. Trends in Biochemical Sciences, 26(9), 573575.
  • Pollitt, A. S. (1998). The key role of classification and indexing in view-based searching. International cataloguing and bibliographic control, 27(2), 3740.
  • Qu, Y., & Furnas, G. W. (2008). Model-driven formative evaluation of exploratory search: A study under a sensemaking framework. Information Processing and Management, 44(2), 534555.
  • Robertson, S. E., & Hancock-Beaulieu, M. M. (1992). On the Evaluation of IR Systems. Information Processing and Management. 28(4), 45766.
  • Shiri, A., & Revie, C. (2006). Query Expansion Behavior Within a Thesaurus-Enhanced Search Environment: A User-Centered Evaluation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 57(4), 462478.
  • Tang, M.-C. (2007). Browsing and searching in a faceted information space: a naturalistic study of PubMed Users' interaction with a display tool. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 58(13), p. 19982006.
  • Taylor, R. S. (1968). Question-negotiation and information seeking in libraries. College & Research Libraries, 29(3), 178194.
  • Vakkari, P. (2003). Task-based information searching. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 2003, vol. 37 (B.Cronin, ed.) Information Today: Medford, NJ, 2002, 413464.
  • White, R. W., Muresan, G., & Marchionini, G. (2006). Report on ACM SIGIR 2006 workshop on evaluating exploratory search system. ACM SIGIR Forum, 40(2).
  • White, R. W., Drucker, S., Kules, B. & Schraefel, Km. c. (2006). Supporting exploratory search. Communications of the ACM (Special Section), 49(4), 3639.
  • White, R. W., Ruthven, I., & Jose, J. M. (2005). A study of factors affecting the utility of implicit relevance feedback. In Proceedings of the 28th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval (pp.35-42). Salvador, Brazil: ACM.