SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Bui, A. & Park, J. (2006). An Assessment of Metadata Quality: A Case Study of the National Science Digital Library Metadata Repository. 2006 annual conference of the Canadian Association for Information Science.
  • Bruce, T. R. & Hillmann, D. (2004). The continuum of metadata quality: defining, expressing, exploiting. Chicago: American Library Association.
  • Cole, T. W. (2002). Creating a Framework of Guidance for Building Good Digital Collections, First Monday. vol. 7.
  • Dushay, N. & Hillmann, D. (2003). Analyzing metadata for effective use and re-use. DCMI Metadata Conference and Workshop Seattle, USA.
  • Guy, M., Powell, A. & Day, M. (2004). Improving the Quality of Metadata in Eprint Archives. Ariadne, vol. 38.
  • Greenberg, J., Pattuelli, M. C., Parsia, B. & Robertson, W. D. (2001). Author-generated Dublin Core Metadata for Web Resources: A Baseline Study in an Organization. Journal of Digital Information, vol. 2, pp. 110.
  • Hughes, B. (2004). Metadata quality evaluation: Experience from the Open Language Archives Community. Proceedings of Digital Libraries: International Collaboration and Cross-Fertilization, vol. 3334, pp. 320329.
  • Lei, Y. G., Sabou, M., Lopez, V., Zhu, J. H., Uren, V. & Motta, E. (2006). An infrastructure for acquiring high quality semantic metadata. Proceedings of Semantic Web: Research and Applications, vol. 4011, pp. 230244.
  • Moen, W. E. & Stewart, E. L. (1998). Assessing Metadata Quality: Findings and Methodological Considerations from an Evaluation of the U.S. Government Information Locator Service (GILS). IEEE International Forum on Research and Technology Advances in Digital Libraries, Santa Barbara, CA, USA, pp. 246255.
  • Ochoa, X. & Duval, E. (2006). Towards Automatic Evaluation of Learning Object Metadata Quality. Advances in Conceptual Modeling – Theory and Practice, pp. 372381.
  • Shreeves, S. L., Knutson, E. M., Stvilia, B., Palmer, C. L., Twidale, M. B. & Cole, T. W. (2005). Is “Quality” Metadata “Shareable” Metadata? The Implications of Local Metadata Practices for Federated Collections. Proceedings of Twelfth National Conference of the Association of College and Research Libraries Chicago, pp. 223237.
  • Sokvitne, L. (2000). An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Current Dublin Core Metadata for Retrieval. ALA Biennial Conference and Exhibition
  • Stvilia, B., Gasser, L., Twidale, M. B. & Smith, L. C. (2007). A framework for information quality assessment. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, vol. 58, pp. 17201733.
  • Tolosana-Calasanz, R., Alvarez-Robles, J. A., Lacasta, J., Nogueras-Iso, J., Muro-Medrano, P. R. & Zarazaga-Soria, F. J. (2006). On the problem of identifying the quality of geographic metadata. Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries, vol. 4172, pp. 232243.
  • Wilson, A. J. (2007). Toward releasing the metadata bottleneck – A baseline evaluation of contributor-supplied metadata. Library Resources & Technical Services, vol. 51, pp. 1628.
  • Zeng, M. L., Subrahmanyam, L., & Shreve, G. M. (2004). Metadata quality study for the National Science Digital Library (NSDL) Metadata Repository. Digital Libraries: International Collaboration and Cross-Fertilization, Proceedings, vol. 3334, pp. 339340.