SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Ackerson, L. G. & Young, V. E. (1994). Evaluating the impact of library instruction methods on the quality of student research. Research Strategies 12, 132144.
  • ACRL (2006a). Introduction to Information Literacy. Association of College and Research Libraries. URL: http://www.ala.org/ala/mgrps/divs/acrl/issues/infolit/infolitoverview/introtoinfolit/introinfolit.cfm. Viewed December 9, 2008.
  • ACRL (2006b). Advocate for IL. Association of College & Research Libraries. URL: http://www.ala.org/ala/mgrps/divs/acrl/issues/infolit/professactivity/advocate/advocateil.cfm. Viewed December 9, 2008.
  • Adams, M. S. (1993). Evaluation. in Sourcebook for Bibliographic Instruction, K.Branch & C.Dusenbury, eds. Chicago, IL:Bibliographic Instruction Section, Association of College and Research Libraries, American Library Association, 4557.
  • Auster, E. & Taylor, S. (2004). Downsizing in Academic Libraries: The Canadian Experience. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.
  • Boyer, C. M. & Ewell, P. T. (1988). State-Based Case Studies of Assessment Initiatives in Undergraduate Education: Chronology of Critical Points. Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States.
  • CARL (2003). The State of Canadian Research Libraries 2001-2002. Canadian Association of Research Libraries. URL: http://www.carl-abrc.ca/projects/state/state_2001_2002-e.html. Viewed August 17, 2006.
  • CCME (1999). A Report on Public Expectations of Postsecondary Education in Canada. Canadian Council of Ministers of Education. URL: http://www.cmec.ca/postsec/expectations.en.pdf. Viewed August 17, 2006.
  • Cooney, M. (2005). Business information literacy instruction: A survey and progress report. Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship, 11(1), 325.
  • Cooney, M., & Hiris, L. (2003). Integrating information literacy and its assessment into a graduate business course: A collaborative framework. Research Strategies, 19(3/4), 213232.
  • Dewald, N. H. (2005). What do they tell their students? Business faculty acceptance of the web and library databases for student research. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 31(3), 209215.
  • Emmons, M. & Martin, W. (2002). Engaging conversation: Evaluating the contribution of library instruction to the quality of student research. College & Research Libraries 63, 545561.
  • Feast, V. (2003). Integration of information literacy skills into business courses. Reference Services Review, 31(1), 8195.
  • Fiegen, A. M., Cherry, B., & Watson, K. (2002). Reflections on collaboration: Learning outcomes and information literacy assessment in the business curriculum. Reference Services Review, 30(4), 307318.
  • Greer, A., Weston, L. & Alm, M. (1991). Assessment of learning outcomes: A measure of progress in library literacy. College & Research Libraries 52, 549557.
  • Hardesty, L., Lovrich, N. P. & Mannon, J. (1982). Library-use instruction: Assessment of the long-term effects. College & Research Libraries 43, 3846.
  • Hawes, D. K. (1994). Information literacy and the business schools. Journal of Education for Business, 70(1), 5461.
  • Hupfer, M. E., & Detlor, B. (2006). Gender and web information seeking: A self-concept orientation model. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 57(8), 11051115.
  • Julien, H. (2006). A longitudinal analysis of information literacy instruction in Canadian academic libraries. Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science 29(3), 289313.
  • Julien, H. & Boon, S. (2004). Assessing instructional outcomes in Canadian academic libraries. Library & Information Science Research, 26(2), 121139.
  • Kanter, J. (2003). Ten hot information technology (IT) issues and what makes them hot. Information Strategy: The Executive's Journal 19(3), 2336.
  • LaGuardia, C. (1996). Teaching the New Library: A How-to-Do-It Manual for Planning and Designing Instructional Programs. New York, NY: Neal-Schuman.
  • Lindauer, B. G. (2004). The three arenas of information literacy assessment. Reference & User Services Quarterly 44(2), 122129.
  • Long, C. M. & Shrikhande, M. M. (2007). Improving information-seeking behavior among business majors. Research Strategies 20, 357369.
  • Lopez, C. (2002). Assessment of student learning: Challenges and strategies. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 28, 356367.
  • Nadeau, G. G. (1995). Criteria and Indicators of Quality and Excellence in Colleges and Universities in Canada: Summary of the Three Phases of the Project. Winnipeg, MB: Centre for Higher Education Research and Development, University of Manitoba.
  • OUSA (1996). Improving Accountability at Canadian Universities: Presented to The Council of Ministers of Education of Canada, Second National Consultation on Education, Edmonton, Alberta, May. Toronto, ON: Ontario Undergraduate Student Alliance.
  • Orme, W. A. (2004). A study of the residual impact of the Texas information literacy tutorial on the information-seeking ability of first year college students. College & Research Libraries, 65(3), 205215.
  • Patton, M. Q. (1997). Utilization-Focused Evalution: The New Century Text, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Rae, B. (2005). Ontario a Leader in Learning: Report and Recommendations. URL: www.yorku.ca/president/whatsnew/finalReport.pdf. Viewed September 4, 2006.
  • Roldan, M., & Wu, Y. D. (2004). Building context-based library instruction. Journal of Education for Business, 79(6), 323327.
  • Selegan, J. C., Thomas, M. L. & Richman, M. L. (1983). Long-range effectiveness of library use instruction. College & Research Libraries 44, 476480.
  • Seamans, N. H. (2002). Student perceptions of information literacy: Insights for librarians. Reference Services Review 30, 112123.
  • Shonrock, D. D. (1996). Evaluating Library Instruction: Sample Questions, Forms and Strategies for Practical Use. Chicago, IL: American Library Association.
  • Sims, S. J. (1992). Student Outcomes Assessment: A Historical Review and Guide to Program Development. New York, NY: Greenwood Press.
  • Smith, S. L. (1991). Report: Commission of Inquiry on Canadian University Education. Ottawa, ON: Association of Universities and Colleges of Canada.
  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Totten, N. T. (1990). Teaching students to evaluate information. Research Quarterly, 29, 348354.
  • Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186204.
  • Venkatesh, V., & Morris, M. G. (2000). Why don't men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior. MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 115139.
  • Wu, Y. D., & Kendall, S. L. (2006). Teaching faculty's perspectives on business information literacy. Reference Services Review, 34(1), 8696.