SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Balkin, J. M. (2004). Digital speech and democratic culture: A theory of freedom of expression for the information society. New York University Law Review, 79, 155.
  • Blakemore, M., & Craglia, M. (2006). Access to public-sector information in Europe: Policy, rights, and obligations. The Information Society, 22, 1324.
  • Burden, P. R. (2000). The key to intellectual freedom is universal access to information. American Libraries, 4649.
  • Burnett, G., Besant, M., & Chatman, E. A. (2001). Small worlds: Normative behavior in virtual communities and feminist book selling. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 52(7), 536547.
  • Burnett, G., & Bonnici, L. (2003). Beyond the FAQ: Explicit and implicit norms in Usenet newsgroups. Library & Information Science Research, 25, 333351.
  • Burnett, G., & Jaeger, P. T. (2008). Small worlds, lifeworlds, and information: The ramifications of the information behavior of social groups in public policy and the public sphere. Information Research, 13(2). Retrieved July 1, 2008, from http://InformationR.net/ir/13-2/paper346html
  • Burnett, G., Jaeger, P. T., & Thompson, K. M. (2008). Normative behavior and information: The social aspects of information access. Library & Information Science Research, 30(1), 5666.
  • Cooke, L. (2007). Controlling the net: European approaches to content and access regulation. Journal of Information Science, 33(3), 360376.
  • Davis, C. N. (2003). Electronic access to information and the privacy paradox. Social Science Computer Review, 21(1), 1526.
  • Dole, W. V., Hurych, J. M., & Koehler, W. C. (2000). Values for librarians in the information age: An expanded examination. Library Management, 21(6), 285297.
  • Drott, M. C. (2006). Open access. In B. Cronin, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (v. 40). Medford, NJ: Information Today, Inc.
  • Eschenfelder, K. (2004a). Behind the web site: An inside look at the production of web-based textual government information. Government Information Quarterly, 21, 337358.
  • Eschenfelder, K. (2004b). How do government agencies review and approve text content for publication on their web sites? A framework to compare web content management practices. Library & Information Science Research, 26, 463481.
  • Feinberg, L. E. (2004). FOIA, federal information policy, and information availability in a post-9/11 world. Government Information Quarterly, 21(4), 439460.
  • Gorman, M. (2000). Our enduring values. Chicago: American Library Association.
  • Grunewald, M. H. (1998). E-FOIA and the “mother of all complaints:” Information delivery and delay reduction. Administrative Law Review, 50(2), 345369.
  • Jaeger, P. T. (2007). Information policy, information access, and democratic participation: The national and international implications of the Bush administration-s information policies. Government Information Quarterly, 24, 840859.
  • Jaeger, P. T., & Bowman, C. A. (2005). Understanding disability: inclusion, access, diversity, and civil rights. Westport, CT: Praeger.
  • Jaeger, P. T., & Burnett, G. (2005). Information access & exchange among small worlds in a democratic society: The role of policy in shaping information behavior in the post-9/11United States. Library Quarterly, 75(4), 464495.
  • Jaeger, P. T., & Thompson, K. M. (2004). Social information behavior and the democratic process: Information poverty, normative behavior, and electronic government in the United States. Library & Information Science Research, 26, 94107.
  • Lievrouw, L. A. (2000). The information environment & universal service. The Information Society, 16(4), 155159.
  • Lievrouw, L. A., & Farb, S. E. (2002). Information and equity. In B.Cronin (Ed.), Annual review of information science and technology (Vol. 37, pp. 499540). Medford, NJ: Information Today, Inc.
  • Lor, P. J., & Britz, J. J. (2007). Is a knowledge society possible without freedom of access to information? Journal of Information Science, 22(4), 387397.
  • Mahler, J., & Regan, P. M. (2007). Crafting the message: Controlling content on agency web sites. Government Information Quarterly, 24, 505521.
  • Mart, S. N. (2006). Let the people know the facts: Can government information removed from the internet be reclaimed? Law Library Journal, 98(1), 731.
  • Matz, C. (2008). Libraries & the USA Patriot Act: Values in conflict. Journal of Library Administration, 47(3), 6987.
  • McClure, C. R. (1988). The federal technical report literature: Research needs and issues. Government Information Quarterly, 5(1), 2744.
  • McCreadie, M. & Rice, R. E. (1999a). Trends in analyzing access to information. Part I: Cross-disciplinary conceptualizations of access. Information Processing & Management, 35(1), 4576.
  • McCreadie, M., & Rice, R. E. (1999b). Trends in analyzing access to information. Part II: Unique and integrating conceptualizations. Information Processing & Management, 35(1), 7799.
  • Nickum, L. S. (2006). Elusive no longer? Increasing accessibility to the federally funded technical report literature. Reference Librarian, 45(94), 3351.
  • Norris, M., Oppenheim, C., & Rowland, F. (2008). The citation advantage of open-access articles. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 59(12), 19631972.
  • Oltmann, S. M., Rosenbaum, H., & Hara, N. (2006). Digital access to government information: To what extent are agencies in compliance with E-FOIA? Proceedings of the 69th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science & Technology.
  • Oppenheim, C. (2008). Electronic scholarly publishing and open access. Journal of Information Science, 34(4), 577590.
  • Pettigrew, K. E., Fidel, R., & Bruce, H. (2001). Conceptual frameworks in information behavior. In M. E.Williams (Ed.), Annual review of information science and technology(Vol. 35, pp. 4378). Medford, NJ: American Society for Information Science and Technology.
  • Reddick, A. (2004). Citizens and the internet: Policy opportunities and challenges. In K. G.Adams & W. F.Birdsall (Eds.), Access to information in a digital world(pp. 730). Ottawa, Canada: Canadian Library Association.
  • Rubin, R. E. (2004). Foundations of library and information science. New York: Neal-Schuman Publishers, Inc.
  • Shill, H. B. (1996). NTIS: Potential roles and government information policy frameworks. Journal of Government Information, 23(3),
  • Suber, P. (2008). Balancing author and publisher rights. Information World, 9(1), 207224.