SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Bowker, G. C., & Star, S. L. (1999). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  • Floyd, I. R., & Renear, A. (2007). What Exactly is an Item in the Digital World? ASIS&T, Proceedings of the Annual Conference.
  • IFLA Study Group on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (1998). Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records: Final Report (FRBR). Munchen: K. G. Saur. Retrieved from: http://www.ifla.org/VII/s13/frbr/frbr.pdf on January 23, 2006.
  • International Working Group on FRBR and CIDOC CRM Harmonisation (2008). FRBR object-oriented definition and mapping to FRBRER (version 0.9 draft). Retrieved from: http://cidoc.ics.forth.gr/docs/frbr_oo/frbr_docs/FRBR_oo_V0.9.pdf on February 25, 2009.
  • Johnston, Pete (2009). httpRange-14, Cool URIs & FRBR. eFoundations: metadata, middleware, elearning (blog). http://efoundations.typepad.com/efoundations/2009/02/httprange14-cool-uris-frbr.html
  • Jones, E. (2005). The FRBR Model as Applied to Continuing Resources. Library Resources & Technical Services, 49(4), 227242.
  • Levinson, J. (1991). Music, Art and Metaphysics: Essays in Philosophical Aesthetics. Cornell University Press.
  • Orlikowski, Wanda J.; Gash, Debra C. (1994). Technological Frames: Making Sense of Information Technology in Organizations. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 12(2), 174207.
  • Renear, A. (2006). Is an XML Document a FRBR Manifestation or a FRBR Expression?—Both, Because FRBR Entities are not Types, but Roles. Extreme Markup Languages 2006, Montreal, Quebec.
  • Renear, A., Dubin, D. (2007). Three of the Four FRBR Group 1 Entity Types are Roles not Types. ASIS&T, Proceedings of the Annual Conference.
  • Renear, A. H., Phillippe, C., Lawton, P., & Dubin, D., (2003). An XML Document Corresponds to Which FRBR Group 1 Entity? In B. T Usdin and S. R. Newcomb (Eds.), Proceedings of Extreme Markup Languages 2003 Montreal, Canada, August.
  • Searle, J. R. (1995). The Construction of Social Reality. New York: The Free Press.
  • Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional Ecology, ‘Translations’ and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387420.
  • Svenonius, E. (2000). The Intellectual Foundation of Information Organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Taniguchi, S. (2004). Design of cataloging rules using conceptual modeling of cataloging process. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(6), 498512. Last retrieved on 2008.02.24 from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.10404
  • Taniguchi, S. (2002). A conceptual model giving primacy to expression-level bibliographic entity in cataloging. Journal of Documentation, 58(4), 363382.
  • Yee, M. M. (1998). What is a work? In J. Weihs (Ed.), The principles and future of AACR: Proceedings of the International Conference on the Principles and Future Development of AACR, 1997 (pp. 62104). Chicago: American Library Association.