SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Anthes RA. 1977. A cumulus parameterization scheme utilizing a one dimensional cloud model. Monthly Weather Review 105: 270286.
  • Anthes RA, Warner TT. 1978. Development of hydrodynamic models suitable for air pollution and other mesometeorological studies. Monthly Weather Review 106: 10451078.
  • Betts AK, Miller MJ. 1986. A new convective adjustment scheme. Part II: single column tests using GATE wave, BOMEX, ATEX and arctic air-mass data sets. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 112: 693709.
  • Cohen C. 2002. A comparison of cumulus parameterizations in idealized sea-breeze simulations. Monthly Weather Review 130: 25542571.
  • Colle BA, Olson JB. 2003. Multiseason verification of the MM5. Part II: evaluation of high- resolution precipitation forecast over the Northeastern United States. Weather and Forecasting 18: 458480.
  • Dudhia J. 1989. Numerical study of convection observed during the winter monsoon experiment using a mesoscale two-dimensional model. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 46: 30773107.
  • Dudhia J. 1996. A multi-layer soil temperature model for MM5. Preprints 6th Annual MM5 Users Workshop, Boulder, CO.
  • Dudhia J, Gill D, Manning K, Wang W, Bruyere C. 2005. PSU/NCAR Mesoscale Modelling System Tutorial Class Notes and Users' Guide (MM5 Modelling System Version 3). National Center for Atmospheric Research: Boulder, CO. http://www.mmm.ucar.edu/mm5/documents.
  • Ferretti R, Paolucci T, Zheng W, Visconti G. 2000. Analyses of the precipitation pattern on the Alpine region using different cumulus convective parameterizations. Journal of Applied Meteorology 39: 182200.
  • Grell GA. 1993. Prognostic evaluation of assumptions used by cumulus parameterizations. Monthly Weather Review 121: 765787.
  • Grell GA, Dudhia J, Stauffer DR. 1995. A Description of the Fifth-Generation Penn State/NCAR Mesoscale Model (MM5). NCAR Tech. Note 398. National Center for Atmospheric Research: Boulder, CO.
  • Hong SY, Pan HL. 1996. Nonlocal boundary layer vertical diffusion in a medium-range forecast model. Monthly Weather Review 122: 927945.
  • Kain JS, Fritsch JM. 1993. Convective parameterization for mesoscale models: the Kain- Fritsch scheme. The representation of cumulus convection in numerical models. Meteorological Monographs of the American Meteorological Society 46: 165170.
  • Kerkhoven E, Gan TY, Shiiba M, Reuter G, Tanaka K. 2006. A comparison of cumulus parameterization schemes in a numerical weather prediction model for a monsoon rainfall event. Hydrological Processes 20: 19611978.
  • Leung LR, Mearns LO, Giorgi F, Wilby RL. 2003. Regional climate research. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 84(1): 8995.
  • Lutgens FK, Tarbuck EJ. 1979. The atmosphere: an introduction to meteorology, 6th edn. Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ; 07632.
  • Mazarakis N, Kotroni V, Lagouvardos K, Argiriou AA. 2009. The sensitivity of numerical forecasts to convective parameterization during the warm period and the use of lightning data as an indicator for convective occurrence. Atmospheric Research 94: 704714. DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosres.2009.03.002.
  • Moetasim A, Shi Y, Tung WW, Trapp RJ, Gao X, Pal JS, Diffenbaugh NS. 2009. Suppression of south Asian summer monsoon precipitation in the 21st century. Geophysical Research Letters 36: L01704, DOI: 10.1029/2008GL036500.
  • Mukhopadhyay P, Taraphdar S, Goswami BN, Krishnakumar K. 2010. Indian summer monsoon precipitation climatology in a high resolution regional climate model: impact of convective parameterization on systematic biases. Weather and Forecasting 25: 369387.
  • Prater BE, Evans JL. 2002. Sensitivity of modeled tropical cyclone track and structure of hurricane Irene (1999) to the convective parameterization scheme. Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics 80: 103115.
  • Ratnam JV, Cox EA. 2006. Simulation of monsoon depressions using MM5: sensitivity to cumulus parameterization schemes. Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics 93: 5378.
  • Reuter GW. 1986. A historical review of cumulus entrainment studies. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 67: 151154.
  • Schultz P. 1995. An explicit cloud physics parameterization for operational numerical weather prediction. Monthly Weather Review 123: 33313343.
  • Shamshad KM. 1988. The Meteorology of Pakistan: Climate and Weather of Pakistan, 1st edn. Royal Book Company: Karachi, Pakistan.
  • Tadross MA, Gutowski WJ, Hewitson BC, Jack C, New M. 2006. MM5 simulations of interannual change and the diurnal cycle of southern African regional climate. Theoretical and Applied Climatology 86: 6380.
  • Wang W, Seaman NL. 1997. A Comparison study of convective parameterization schemes in a mesoscale model. Monthly Weather Review 125: 252278.