SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Applequist S, Gahrs EG, Pfeffer RL, Niu X-F. 2002. Comparison of methodologies for probabilistic quantitative precipitation forecasting. Weather and Forecasting 17: 783799.
  • Brier GW. 1950. Verification of forecasts expressed in terms of probability. Monthly Weather Review 78: 13.
  • Ebert EE. 2001. Ability of a poor man's ensemble to predict the probability and distribution of precipitation. Monthly Weather Review 129: 24612480.
  • Ebert EE, Damrath U, Wergen W, Baldwin ME. 2003. The WGNE assessment of short-term quantitative precipitation forecasts. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 84: 481492.
  • Ebert EE, Janowiak JE, Kidd C. 2007. Comparison of near-real-time precipitation estimates from satellite observations and numerical models. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 88: 4764.
  • Eckel FA, Walters MK. 1998. Calibrated probabilistic quantitative precipitation forecasts based on the MRF ensemble. Weather and Forecasting 13: 11321147.
  • Epstein ES. 1969. Stochastic-dynamic prediction. Tellus 21: 739759.
  • Fraley C, Raftery AE, Gneiting T. 2010. Calibrating multimodel forecast ensembles with exchangeable and missing members using bayesian model averaging. Monthly Weather Review 138: 190202.
  • Gahrs GE, Applequist S, Pfeffer RL, Niu X. 2003. Improved results for probabilistic quantitative precipitation forecasting. Weather and Forecasting 18: 879890.
  • Gallus WA, Baldwin ME, Elmore KL. 2007. Evaluation of probabilistic precipitation forecasts determined from ETA and AVN forecasted amounts. Weather and Forecasting 22: 207215.
  • Gallus WA, Seagal M. 2004. Does increased predicted warm-season rainfall indicate enhanced likelihood of rain occurrence? Weather and Forecasting 19: 11271135.
  • Gneiting T, Raftery AE, Westveld AH III, Goldman T. 2005. Calibrated probabilistic forecasts using ensemble model output statistics and minimum CRPS estimation. Monthly Weather Review 133: 10981118.
  • Hamill T, Colucci SJ. 1997. Verification of Eta-RSM short-range ensemble forecasts. Monthly Weather Review 125: 13121327.
  • Hamill T, Colucci SJ. 1998. Evaluation of Eta-RSME ensemble probabilistic precipitation forecasts. Monthly Weather Review 126: 711724.
  • Hamill T, Whitaker JS. 2006. Probabilistic quantitative precipitation forecasts based on reforecast analogs: theory and application. Monthly Weather Review 134: 32093229.
  • Hamill T, Whitaker JS, Wei X. 2004. Ensemble re-forecasting: improving medium-range forecast skill using retrospective forecasts. Monthly Weather Review 132: 14341447.
  • Hamill T, Whitaker JS. 2006. Probabilistic Quantitative Precipitation Forecasts based on Reforecast Analogs: Theory and Application. Monthly Weather Review 134: 32093229.
  • Hersbach H. 2000. Decomposition of the continuous ranked probability score for ensemble prediction systems. Weather and Forecasting 15: 559570.
  • Hong S, Pan H. 1996. Nonlocal boundary layer vertical diffusion in a medium-range forecast model. Monthly Weather Review 10: 23222339.
  • Janowiak JE, Kousky VE, Joyce RJ. 2005. Diurnal cycle of precipitation determined from the CMORPH high spatial and temporal resolution global precipitation analyses. Journal of Geophysical Research 110: 18 pp. DOI: 10.1029/2005JD006156.
  • Joyce RJ, Janowiak JE, Arkin PA, Xie P. 2004. CMORPH: a method that produces global precipitation estimates from passive microwave and infrared data at high spatial and temporal resolution. Journal of Hydrometeorology 5: 487503.
  • Kain JS. 2004. The kain-fritsch convective parameterization: an update. Journal of Applied Meteorology 43: 170181.
  • McLean Sloughter J, Raftery A, Gneiting T, Fraley C. 2007. Probabilistic quantitative precipitation forecasting using bayesian model averaging. Monthly Weather Review 135: 32093220.
  • Palmer TN, Buizza R, Leutbecher M, Hagedorn R, Jung T, Rodwell M, Vitart F, Berner J, Hagel E, Lawrence A, Pappenberger F, Park Y-Y, von Bremen L, Gilmour I. 2007. The Ensemble Prediction System—Recent and Ongoing Developments. ECMWF Technical Memoranda N°430, October 2007, 53 pp.
  • Raftery A, Gneiting T, Balabdaoui F, Polakowski M. 2005. Using Bayesian model averaging to calibrate forecast ensembles. Monthly Weather Review 133: 11551174.
  • Ruiz J. 2009. CMORPH precipitation estimates calibration and verification over South America. Revista Brasileira de Meteorologia 24: 474488 (in Spanish).
  • Ruiz J, Saulo C, Kalnay E. 2009. Comparison of methods to generate probabilistic quantitative precipitation forecasts over South America. Weather and Forecasting 24: 319336.
  • Ruiz JJ, Saulo C, Nogués-Paegle J. 2010. WRF Model Sensitivity to Choice of Parameterization over South America: Validation against Surface Variables. Mon. Wea. Rev. 138: 33423355. DOI: 10.1175/2010MWR3358.1.
  • Ruiz JJ, Saulo C, Kalnay E. 2011. How sensitive are probabilistic precipitation forecasts to the choice of calibration algorithms and the ensemble generation method? Part II: Sensitivity to ensemble generation methods. Meteorological Applications DOI: 10.1002/met.262.
  • Salio P, Nicolini M, Zipser E. 2007. Mesoscale convective systems in Southeastern South America and their relationship with the South American Low Level Jet. Monthly Weather Review 135: 12901309.
  • Schaffer CJ, Gallus AG, Segal M. 2011. Improving probabilistic ensemble forecasts of convection through the application of QPF-POP relationships. Weather and Forecasting 26: 319336.
  • Schmeits MJ, Kok KJ. 2010. A comparison between raw ensemble output, (modified) Bayesian model averaging, and extended logistic regression using ECMWF ensemble precipitation reforecasts. Monthly Weather Review 138: 41994211.
  • Skamarock WC, Klemp JB, Dudhia J, Gill DO, Barker DM, Wang W, Powers JG. 2005. A Description of the Advanced Research WRF Version 2, Technical Note TN-468 + STR. NCAR: Boulder, CO; 100 pp.
  • Stensrud D, Yussouf N. 2007. Reliable probabilistic quantitative precipitation forecasts from a short-range ensemble forecasting system. Weather and Forecasting 22: 317.
  • Toth Z, Kalnay E. 1993. Ensemble forecasting at NMC: the generation of perturbations. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 74: 23172330.
  • Stephenson DB, Coelho CAS, Jolliffe IT. 2008. Two Extra Components in the Brier Score Decomposition. Weather and Forecasting 23: 752757.
  • Wilks DS. 2006a. Statistical Methods in the Atmospheric Sciences: International Geophysics Series, Vol. 91. Academic Press: London; 627 pp.
  • Wilks DS. 2006b. Comparison of ensemble'MOS methods in the Lorenz'96 system. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 131: 238407.
  • Wilks DS. 2009. Extending logistic regression to provide full' probability distribution MOS forecasts. Meteorological Applications 16: 361368.
  • Wilks DS, Hamill T. 2007. Comparison of ensemble-MOS methods using GFS reforecasts. Monthly Weather Review 135: 23792390.
  • Zhu Y, Toth Z, Wobus R, Richardson D, Mylne K. 2002. The economic value of ensemble-based weather forecast. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 83: 7383.