SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • 1
    Leiner T, Ho KY, Thelissen GR, Nelemans PJ, de Haan MW, van Engelshoven JM. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 1999; 143: 10871093.
  • 2
    Westenberg JJM, van der Geest RJ, Wasser MNJM, van der Linden EL, van Walsum T, van Assen HC, de Roos A, Vanderschoot J, Reiber JHC. Vessel diameter measurements in gadolinium contrast enhanced three-dimensional MRA of peripheral arteries. Magn Reson Imaging 2000; 18: 1322.
  • 3
    Ho KY, de Haan MW, Oei TK, Koster D, Kessels AG, Janevski BK, Kitslaar P, van Engelshoven JM. MR angiography of the iliac and upper femoral arteries using four different inflow techniques. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 169: 4553.
  • 4
    Ho KY, Leiner T, de Haan MW, Kessels AG, Kitslaar PJ, van Engelshoven JM. Peripheral vascular tree stenoses: evaluation with moving-bed infusion-tracking MR angiography. Radiology 1998; 206: 683692.
  • 5
    Ho KY, de Haan MW, Kessels AG, Kitslaar PJ, van Engelshoven JM. Peripheral vascular tree stenoses: detection with subtracted and nonsubtracted MR angiography. Radiology 1998; 206: 673681.
  • 6
    Kaandorp DW, Vasbinder GB, de Haan MW, Kemerink GJ, van Engelshoven JM. Motion of the proximal renal artery during the cardiac cycle. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000; 12: 924928.
  • 7
    Leiner T, Ho KY, van Engelshoven JM. Techniques of dynamic subtraction contrastenhanced MR angiography. Radiographics 2000; 20: 11131114.
  • 8
    Aylwrd S, Bullit E, Pizer S, Eberly D. Intensity ridge and widths for tubular object segmentation and description. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/SIAM Workshop on Mathematical Methods and Biomedical Image Analysis, 1996. p 131138.
  • 9
    Chen H, Hale J. An algorithm for MR angiography image enhancement. Magn Reson Med 1995; 33: 534540.
  • 10
    Du YP, Parker DL. Vessel enhancement filtering in three-dimensional MR angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 1995; 5: 353359.
  • 11
    Du YP, Parker DL. Vessel enhancement filtering in three-dimensional MR angiograms using long-range signal correlation. J Magn Reson Imaging 1997; 7: 447450.
  • 12
    Kutka R, Stier S. Extraction of line properties based in direction fields. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1996; 15: 5158.
  • 13
    Orkisz MM, Bresson C, Magnin IE, Champin O, Douek PC. Improved vessel visualization in MR angiography by nonlinear anisotropic filtering. Magn Reson Med 1997; 37: 914919.
  • 14
    Poli R, Valli G. An algorithm for real-time vessel enhancement and detection. Comput Methods Prog Biomed 1996; 52: 122.
  • 15
    Steger C. An unbiased detector if curvilinear structures. IEEE Trans Patt Anal Machine Intel 1998; 20: 113125.
  • 16
    Wilson DL, Noble JCA. Segmentation of cerebral vessels and aneurysms from MR angiography data. Proc Info Process Med Imaging 1997; 1230: 423428.
  • 17
    Sethian JA. A fast marching level set method for monotonically advancing fronts. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 1996; 93: 15911595.
  • 18
    Sethian JA. Level set methods: evolving interfaces in geometry, fluid mechanics, computer vision, and materials science. Number 3 in Cambridge monographs on applied and computational mathematics. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press; 1996. 218 p.
  • 19
    Malladi R, Sethian JA, Vemuri BC. Shape modeling with front propagation: a level set approach. IEEE Trans Patt Anal Machine Intel 1995; 17: 158175.
  • 20
    Malladi R, Sethian JA. A real-time algorithm for medical shape recovery. Proc Inter Conf Comput Vis 1998; 1: 304310.
  • 21
    Rosenfeld A. Connectivity in digital pictures. J ACM 1970; 17: 146160.
  • 22
    Schirmacher H, Zöckler M, Stalling D, Hege H-C. Boundary surface shrinking—a continuous approach to 3D center line extraction. Proc. IMDSP 1998; 1: 2528.
  • 23
    Cuisenaire O. Distance transformations: fast algorithms and applications to medical image processing. PhD thesis, Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain, Belgium, 1999.
  • 24
    Piegl L, Tiller W. The NURBS book. 2nd ed. Springer-Verlag; 1996.
  • 25
    De Marco JK, Nesbit GM, WesBey GE, Richardson D. Prospective evaluation of extracranial carotid stenosis: MR angiography with maximum intensity projections and multi planar reformation compared with conventional angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994; 163: 12051212.
  • 26
    Kreft B, Strunk H, Flacke S, Wolff M, Conrad R, Gieseke J, Pauleit D, Bachmann R, Hirner A, Schild HH. Detection of thrombosis in the portal venous system: comparison of contrast-enhanced MR angiography with intraarterial digital subtraction angiography. Radiology 2000; 216: 8692.
  • 27
    Loewe C, Schoder M, Rand T, Hoffmann U, Sailer J, Kos T, Lammer J, Thurnher S. Peripheral vascular occlusive disease: evaluation with contrast-enhanced moving-bed MR angiography versus digital subtraction angiography in 106 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002; 179: 10131021.
  • 28
    Rasanen HT, Manninen HI, Vanninen RL, Vainio P, Berg M, Saari T. Mild carotid artery atherosclerosis: assessment by 3-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography, with reference to intravascular ultrasound imaging and contrast angiography. Stroke 1999; 30: 827833.
  • 29
    Janssen JP, Koning G, de Koning PJH, Tuinenburg JC, Reiber JHC. A novel approach for the detection of pathlines in x-ray angiograms: the wavefront propagation algorithm. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2002; 18: 317324.
  • 30
    Anderson CM, Lee RE, Levin DL, de la Torre Alonso S, Saloner D. Measurement of internal carotid artery stenosis from source MR angiograms. Radiology 1994; 193: 219226.
  • 31
    Blatter DD, Bahr AL, Parker DI, Robison RO, Kimball JA, Perry DM, Horn S. Cervical carotid MR angiography with multiple overlapping thin-slab acquisition: comparison with conventional angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1993; 161: 12691277.
  • 32
    Frangi AF, Niessen WJ, Nederkoorn PJ, Bakker J, Mali WP, Viergever MA. Quantitative analysis of vascular morphology from 3D MR angiograms: in vitro and in vivo results. Magn Reson Med 2001; 45: 311322.
  • 33
    Guzman R, Oswald H, Barth A, de Koning PJH, Remonda L, Lovblad KO, Schroth G. Clinical validation of quantitative carotid MRA. volume 1230 of International congress series. Vol. 1230. New York: Elsevier Science; 2001. p 934937.
  • 34
    Guzman R, Barth A, Remonda L, de Koning PJH, van de Geest RJ, Lovblad KO, Oswald H, Schroth G. Correlation of quantitative MR-angiography of the carotid artery with in vivo measurement during carotid enarterectomy. In: LemkeHU, VannierMW, InamuraK, FarmanAG, DoiK, ReiberJHC, editors. Vol. 47 Proceedings of the 16th International Congress and Exhibition, Paris, 2002. 917922.
  • 35
    Modaresi KB, Cox TC, Summers PE, Jarosz JM, Verma H, Taylor PR, Padayachee TS. Comparison of intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography, magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasonography for measuring carotid artery stenosis. Br J Surg 1999; 86: 14221426.