Full Paper
What levels of precision are achievable for quantification of perfusion and capillary permeability surface area product using ASL?
Article first published online: 24 JUL 2007
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.21317
Copyright © 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Additional Information
How to Cite
Carr, J. P., Buckley, D. L., Tessier, J. and Parker, G. J. (2007), What levels of precision are achievable for quantification of perfusion and capillary permeability surface area product using ASL?. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 58: 281–289. doi: 10.1002/mrm.21317
Publication History
- Issue published online: 24 JUL 2007
- Article first published online: 24 JUL 2007
- Manuscript Revised: 2 MAY 2007
- Manuscript Accepted: 2 MAY 2007
- Manuscript Received: 11 JUL 2006
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- ASL;
- perfusion;
- permeability;
- two-compartment model;
- FAIR
Abstract
We examine the use of arterial spin labeling (ASL) in normal brains of rats and humans to measure perfusion (F) and capillary permeability surface area product (PS) using a previously described two-compartment model. We investigate the experimental limits on F and PS quantification using simulations and experimental verification in rat brain at 9.4T. A sensitivity analysis on the two-compartment model is presented to estimate optimal experimental inversion times (TIs) for F and PS quantification and indicate how sensitive the model would be to changes in F and PS. We present the expected error on flow-sensitive alternating inversion recovery (FAIR)-based F and PS measurements and quantify the precision with which these parameters could be estimated at various signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs). Perfusion was measured in four rat brains using FAIR ASL, and we conclude that perfusion could be quantified with an acceptable level of precision using this technique. However, we found that to measure PS with even a 100% coefficient of variation (CV) would require an SNR increase of approximately 2 orders of magnitude over our acquired data. We conclude that with current MR capabilities and with the experimental approach used in this study, acceptable levels of precision in the measurement of PS are not possible. Magn Reson Med 58:281–289, 2007. © 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

1522-2594/asset/MRM_left.gif?v=1&s=5969df2beb44a0574452410c77dd4f39f1258c50)
1522-2594/asset/MRM_right.gif?v=1&s=5393eec9f654b39630b945fd1b37ae8304304345)
1522-2594/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=9512352d4133369aa19bc75e4ffa8001ea23b2d9)