• 1
    Bean MJ, Johnson PT, Roseborough GS, Black JH, Fishman EK. Thoracic aortic stent-grafts: utility of multidetector CT for pre- and postprocedure evaluation. Radiographics 2008; 28: 18351851.
  • 2
    Nag S, Bice W, DeWyngaert K, Prestidge B, Stock R, Yu Y. The American Brachytherapy Society recommendations for permanent prostate brachytherapy postimplant dosimetric analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2000; 46: 221230.
  • 3
    Roach M, Faillace-Akazawa P, Malfatti C, Holland J, Hricak H. Prostate volumes defined by magnetic resonance imaging and computerized tomographic scans for three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1996; 35: 10111018.
  • 4
    Rhode KS, Sermesant M, Brogan D, Hegde S, Hipwell J, Lambiase P, Rosenthal E, Bucknall C, Qureshi SA, Gill JS, Razavi R, Hill DLG. A system for real-time XMR guided cardiovascular intervention. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2005; 24: 14281440.
  • 5
    Acher P, Rhode K, Morris S, Gaya A, Miquel M, Popert R, Tham I, Nichol J, McLeish K, Deehan C, Dasgupta P, Beaney R, Keevil SF. Comparison of combined X-ray radiography and magnetic resonance (XMR) imaging-versus computed tomography-based dosimetry for the evaluation of permanent prostate brachytherapy implants. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2008; 71: 15181525.
  • 6
    Dubois DF, Prestidge BR, Hotchkiss LA, Bice WS, Prete JJ. Source localization following permanent transperineal prostate interstitial brachytherapy using magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1997; 39: 10371041.
  • 7
    Varma G, Pedersen SF, Taupitz M, Botnar RM, Dahnke H, Keevil SF, Schaeffter T. Utilizing different methods for visualizing susceptibility from a single multi-gradient echo dataset. MAGMA 2009; 22: 297308.
  • 8
    Seppenwoolde JH, Viergever MA, Bakker CJG. Passive tracking exploiting local signal conservation: The white marker phenomenon. Magn Reson Med 2003; 50: 784790.
  • 9
    Stuber M, Gilson WD, Schär M, Kedziorek DA, Hofmann LV, Shah S, Vonken EJ, Bulte JWM, Kraitchman DL. Positive contrast visualization of iron oxide-labeled stem cells using inversion-recovery with ON-resonant water suppression (IRON). Magn Reson Med 2007; 58: 10721077.
  • 10
    Dahnke H, Liu W, Herzka D, Frank JA, Schaeffter T. Susceptibility gradient mapping (SGM): A new postprocessing method for positive contrast generation applied to superparamagnetic iron oxide particle (SPIO)-labeled cells. Magn Reson Med 2008; 60: 595603.
  • 11
    Eggebrecht H, Zenge M, Ladd ME, Erbel R, Quick HH. In vitro evaluation of current thoracic aortic stent-grafts for real-time MR-guided placement. J Endovasc Ther 2006; 13: 6271.
  • 12
    Vonken EJPA, Schär M, Stuber M. Positive contrast visualization of nitinol devices using susceptibility gradient mapping. Magn Reson Med 2008; 60: 588594.
  • 13
    Chen NK, Oshio K, Panych LP. Application of k-space energy spectrum analysis to susceptibility field mapping and distortion correction in gradient-echo EPI. NeuroImage 2006; 31: 609622.
  • 14
    Dahnke H, Liu W, Bowtell R, Frank JA. High resolution positive contrast via post-processing from conventional 3D imaging. In: Proceedings 16th Scientific Meeting, International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Toronto, Canada; 2008. p 1513.
  • 15
    Seppenwoolde JH, Vincken KL, Bakker CJG. White-marker imaging—separating magnetic susceptibility effects from partial volume effects. Magn Reson Med 2007; 58: 605609.
  • 16
    Rosset A, Spadola L, Ratib O. OsiriX: an open-source software for navigating in multidimensional DICOM images. J Digit Imaging 2004; 17: 205216.
  • 17
    Schenck JF. The role of magnetic susceptibility in magnetic resonance imaging: MRI magnetic compatibility of the first and second kinds. Med Phys 1996; 23: 815850.
  • 18
    Blum P. Physical properties handbook: a guide to the shipboard measurement of physical properties of deep-sea cores. ODP Tech. Note, 26 [Online] 1997. Available at:
  • 19
    Frahm C, Gehl HB, Melchert UH, Weiss HD. Visualization of magnetic resonance-compatible needles at 1.5 and 0.2 Tesla. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 1996; 19: 335340.
  • 20
    van der Laan MJ, Bartels LW, Bakker CJG, Viergever MA, Blankensteijn JD. Suitability of 7 aortic stent-graft models for MRI-based surveillance. J Endovasc Ther 2004; 11: 366371.