Reproducibility of fractional ventilation derived by Fourier decomposition after adjusting for tidal volume with and without an MRI compatible spirometer

Authors

  • Andreas Voskrebenzev,

    1. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Biomedical Research in Endstage and Obstructive Lung Disease Hannover (BREATH), Member of the German Center for Lung Research, Hannover, Germany
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Marcel Gutberlet,

    1. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Biomedical Research in Endstage and Obstructive Lung Disease Hannover (BREATH), Member of the German Center for Lung Research, Hannover, Germany
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Lena Becker,

    1. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Biomedical Research in Endstage and Obstructive Lung Disease Hannover (BREATH), Member of the German Center for Lung Research, Hannover, Germany
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Frank Wacker,

    1. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Biomedical Research in Endstage and Obstructive Lung Disease Hannover (BREATH), Member of the German Center for Lung Research, Hannover, Germany
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Jens Vogel-Claussen

    Corresponding author
    1. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Biomedical Research in Endstage and Obstructive Lung Disease Hannover (BREATH), Member of the German Center for Lung Research, Hannover, Germany
    • Correspondence to: Jens Vogel-Claussen, M.D., Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, -OE 8220-, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany. E-mail: vogel-claussen.jens@mh-hannover.de

    Search for more papers by this author

Abstract

Purpose

To reduce the influence of tidal volume on fractional ventilation (FV) derived by Fourier decomposition (FD).

Methods

Twelve volunteers were examined on a 1.5 Tesla scanner. Spoiled gradient echo imaging of coronal and sagittal slices of the lung were performed. The tidal volume variations between different acquisitions were studied by reproducibility and repeatability measurements. To adjust the FV derived by FD for tidal volume differences between the measurements, during all acquisitions, the lung volume changes were measured by a spirometer and used to calculate a global FV parameter. As an alternative, using the FD data, the lung area changes were calculated and used for the adjustment.

Results

Reproducibility analysis of unadjusted coronal FV showed a determination coefficient of math formula and an intraclass correlation coefficient of math formula. Differences in the measurements could be ascribed to different tidal volumes. Area adjusted values exhibited an increased math formula of 84% and a higher ICC of 97%. For the coronal middle slice/sagittal slices in free breathing, the inter-volunteer coefficient of variation was reduced from 0.23/0.28 (unadjusted) to 0.16/0.20 (spirometer) or 0.12/0.13 (area).

Conclusion

The calculation of lung area changes is sufficient to increase the reproducibility of FV in a volunteer cohort avoiding the need for an MRI compatible spirometer. Magn Reson Med 76:1542–1550, 2016. © 2015 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Ancillary