SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Angell KL, Kreshka MA, McCoy R, Donnelly P, Turner-Cobb JM, Graddy K, Kraemer HC, Koopman C (2003). Psychosocial intervention for rural women with breast cancer. Journal of General Internal Medicine 18: 499507.
  • Arnstein SR (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Planning Association 35: 21624.
  • Barber R, Boote J, Parry G, Cooper C, Yeeles P, Cook S (2011). Can the impact of public involvement on research be evaluated? A mixed methods study. Health Expectations 15: 22941.
  • Barham L (2011). Public and patient involvement at the UK National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. The Patient: Patient-Centred Outcomes Research 4: 110.
  • Boote J, Baird W, Beecroft C (2010). Public involvement at the design stage of primary health research. A narrative review of case examples. Health Policy 95: 1023.
  • Boote J, Baird W, Sutton A (2011). Public involvement in the design and conduct of clinical trials: A review. International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences 5: 91111.
  • Boote J, Barber R, Cooper C (2006). Principles and indicators of successful consumer involvement in NHS research: Results of a Delphi study and subgroup analysis. Health Policy 75: 28097.
  • Brett J, Staniszewska S, Mockford C, Herron-Marx S, Hughes J, Tysall C, Suleman R (2012). Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research: A systematic review. Health Expectations doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2012.00795.x. [Epub ahead of print]
  • Buckland S, Hayes H, Ostrer C, Royle J, Steel R, Terpey M, Walton J, Yeeles P (2007). Public Information Pack (PIP): How to get actively involved in NHS, public health and social care research. Eastleigh: INVOLVE.
  • de Wit MP, Berlo SE, Aanerud GJ, Aletaha D, Bijlsma JW, Croucher L, Da Silva JA, Glüsing B, Gossec L, Hewlett S, Jongkees M, Magnusson D, Scholte-Voshaar M, Richards P, Ziegler C, Abma TA (2011). European League Against Rheumatism recommendations for the inclusion of patient representatives in scientific projects. Annals of Rheumatic Diseases 70: 7226.
  • de Wit MPT, Elberese JE, Broerse JEW, Abma TA (2013). Do not forget the professional – The value of the FIRST model for guiding the structural involvement of patients in rheumatology research. Health Expectations doi: 10.1111/hex.12048. [Epub ahead of print]
  • Elliott E, Watson A, Harries U (2002). Harnessing expertise: Involving peer interviewers in qualitative research with hard-to-reach populations. Health Expectations 5: 1728.
  • Evans BA, Bedson E, Bell P, Hutchings H, Lowes L, Rea D, Seagrove A, Siebert S, Smith G, Snooks H, Thomas M, Thorne K, Russell I, WWORTH (2013). Involving service users in trials: Developing a standard operating procedure. Trials 14: 219.
  • Fudge N, Wolfe C, McKevitt C (2008). Assessing the promise of user involvement in health service development: Ethnographic study. British Medical Journal 336: 313.
  • Gibson A, Britten N, Lynch J (2012). Theoretical directions for an emancipatory concept of patient and public involvement. Health 16: 53147.
  • Gooberman-Hill R, Horwood J, Calnan M (2008). Citizens’ juries in planning research priorities: Process, engagement and outcome. Health Expectations 11: 27281.
  • Gooberman-Hill R, Jinks C, Bouças SB, Hislop K, Dziedzic KS, Rhodes C, Burston A, Adams J (2013). Designing a placebo device: Involving service users in clinical trial design. Health Expectations doi: 10.1111/hex.12043. [Epub ahead of print]
  • Heimer CA, Petty J (2010). Bureaucratic ethics: IRBs and the legal regulation of human subjects research. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 6: 60126.
  • Hewlett S, Cockshott Z, Byron M, Kitchen K, Tipler S, Pope D, Hehir M (2005). Patients’ perceptions of fatigue in rheumatoid arthritis: Overwhelming, uncontrollable, ignored. Arthritis and Rheumatism 53:697702.
  • Hewlett S, De Wit M, Richards P, Quest E, Hughes R, Heiberg T, Kirwan J (2006). Patients and professionals as research partners: Challenges, practicalities, and benefits. Arthritis Care and Research 55: 67680.
  • INVOLVE (2012). Briefing notes for researchers: Involving the public in NHS, public health and social care research. INVOLVE, Eastleigh.
  • Oliver S, Armes DG, Gyte G (2009). Public involvement in setting a national research agenda: A mixed methods evaluation. The Patient: Patient Centred Outcomes Research 2: 17990.
  • Rowe G, Frewer LJ (2005). A typology of public engagement mechanisms. Science, Technology and Human Values 30: 25190.
  • Staley K, Buckland SA, Hayes H, Tarpey M (2012). ‘The missing links’: Understanding how context and mechanism influence the impact of public involvement in research. Health Expectations doi: 10.1111/hex.12017. [Epub ahead of print]
  • Staniszewska S, Brett J, Mockford C, Barber R (2011). The GRIPP checklist: Strengthening the quality of patient and public involvement reporting in research. International Journal of Technology Assessment 27: 3919.
  • Tritter JQ, McCallum A (2006). The snakes and ladders of user involvement: Moving beyond Arnstein. Health Policy 76: 15668.
  • Vale C, Thompson L, Murphy C, Forcat S, Hanley B (2012). Involvement of consumers in studies run by the Medical Research Council (MRC) Clinical Trials Unit: Results of a survey. Trials 13: 9.
  • Ward PR, Thompson J, Barber R, Armitage CJ, Boote JD, Cooper CL, Jones GL (2010). Critical perspectives on ‘consumer involvement’ in health research: Epistemological dissonance and the know-do gap. Journal of Sociology 46: 6382.