This review was approved by the AAEM Board (January 2004), Equipment and Computer Committee of the AAEM, John C. Kincaid, MD (Chair); QST Task Force of the AAEM, Peter Siao Tick Chong, MD (Chair); Practice Issues Review Panel of the AAEM, Robert G. Miller, MD (Chair).
AAEM Practice Topic
Technology literature review: Quantitative sensory testing†
Version of Record online: 12 APR 2004
Copyright © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Muscle & Nerve
Volume 29, Issue 5, pages 734–747, May 2004
How to Cite
Chong, P. S. T. and Cros, D. P. (2004), Technology literature review: Quantitative sensory testing. Muscle Nerve, 29: 734–747. doi: 10.1002/mus.20053
- Issue online: 23 APR 2004
- Version of Record online: 12 APR 2004
- heat pain;
- quantitative sensory testing;
- sensory threshold;
The development of the personal computer has simplified the process of quantitating sensory thresholds using various testing algorithms. We reviewed the technical aspects and reproducibility of different methods to determine threshold for light touch-pressure, vibration, thermal, and pain stimuli. Clinical uses and limitations of quantitative sensory testing (QST) were also reviewed. QST is a reliable psychophysical test of large- and small-fiber sensory modalities. The results of QST are highly dependent on methodology and the full cooperation of the subject. QST has been shown to be reasonably reproducible over a period of days or weeks in normal subjects. The use of QST in research and patient care should be limited to instruments and their corresponding methodologies that have been shown to be reproducible. Literature data do not allow conclusions regarding the relative merits of individual QST instruments. Muscle Nerve 29: 734–747, 2004