Predictors of response to immunomodulation in patients with myasthenia gravis

Authors

  • Hans D. Katzberg MD, FRCPC,

    Corresponding author
    1. University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    2. Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, 200 Elizabeth Street, SEC-506, Toronto, Ontario M5B 2H9, Canada
    • University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

    Search for more papers by this author
  • Carolina Barnett MD,

    1. University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    2. Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, 200 Elizabeth Street, SEC-506, Toronto, Ontario M5B 2H9, Canada
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Vera Bril MD, FRCP

    1. University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    2. Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, 200 Elizabeth Street, SEC-506, Toronto, Ontario M5B 2H9, Canada
    Search for more papers by this author

Abstract

Introduction: Factors determining response to intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) and plasmapheresis in myasthenia gravis (MG) have not been evaluated systematically. Methods: This study included patients treated with IVIg (n = 63) or plasmapheresis (n = 42) from two trials evaluating IVIg vs. placebo or plasmapheresis in MG. Response was defined as improvement in the quantitative myasthenia gravis score (QMGS) of ≥3.5 points at day 14. Baseline clinical, electrophysiological, and immunological factors were analyzed as predictors. Results: Baseline QMGS, acetylcholine receptor antibody (AChRAb) positivity, single-fiber electromyography (SFEMG) jitter, and percent abnormal pairs and percent blocking pairs were higher in responders than in non-responders. Using multivariate logistic regression, the odds ratio for response was 13.0 (1.01–381.5) in QMGS 11–17 and 15.3 (1.34–414.3) in QMGS >17 compared with QMGS <11. Conclusions: Baseline QMGS, AChRAb positivity, and SFEMG parameters were more abnormal in patients who responded to treatment. Using multivariate regression, baseline QMGS remained as the only significant independent predictor of response. Muscle Nerve, 2012

Ancillary