Get access

Reporting the results of diagnostic neuromuscular ultrasound: An educational report

Authors

  • Lisa D. Hobson-Webb MD,

    1. Department of Medicine, Division of Neurology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Andrea J. Boon MD

    Corresponding author
    1. Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
    • Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
    Search for more papers by this author

  • Disclaimer: This report is not a policy statement and is provided as an educational service of the AANEM. It is not intended to include all possible methods of care of a particular clinical problem or all legitimate criteria for choosing to use a specific procedure. Neither is it intended to exclude any reasonable alternative methodologies. The AANEM recognizes that specific patient care decisions are the prerogative of the patient and his/her physician and are based on all of the circumstances involved.

  • This practice topic was developed by members of the American Association of Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine (AANEM) Professional Practice Committee. Approved by the AANEM Board of Directors on July 26, 2012.

Correspondence to: AANEM, 2621 Superior Drive NW, Rochester, MN 55901; email: aanem@aanem.org

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Neuromuscular ultrasound (NMUS), an emerging diagnostic subspecialty field, has become an important extension of the electrodiagnostic examination. However, there are no formal guidelines on how to appropriately report NMUS results. Methods: The AANEM convened an expert panel to develop recommendations for reporting NMUS findings. Results: Providers should describe the reason for referral, the nerves or muscles studied, and normal values as well as numerical values for the results of imaging. Muscle imaging reports should also include a description of how gray-scale values were calculated. NMUS-guided needle placement reports should include a description of the length and gauge of needle, the type of probe used, and an indication of how well the patient tolerated the procedure. All reports should clearly state whether the findings were normal or abnormal and include a definitive diagnosis. Conclusions: NMUS reports should provide comprehensive information along with a succinct conclusion, mirroring guidelines for electrodiagnostic reports. Muscle Nerve, 2013

Ancillary