Urodynamic techniques were performed according to the ‘Good Urodynamic Practice’ recommended by the International Continence Society.
Article first published online: 27 MAR 2002
Copyright © 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Neurourology and Urodynamics
Volume 21, Issue 3, pages 261–274, 2002
How to Cite
Schäfer, W., Abrams, P., Liao, L., Mattiasson, A., Pesce, F., Spangberg, A., Sterling, A. M., Zinner, N. R. and Kerrebroeck, P. v. (2002), Good urodynamic practices: Uroflowmetry, filling cystometry, and pressure-flow studies. Neurourol. Urodyn., 21: 261–274. doi: 10.1002/nau.10066
This report is from the Standardization Committee of the International Continence Society.
- Issue published online: 27 MAR 2002
- Article first published online: 27 MAR 2002
- 1997. Standardization of terminology of lower urinary tract function: pressure-flow studies of voiding, urethral resistance, and urethral obstruction. Neurourol Urodyn 16: 1–18. , , , , , .
- 1999. Urodynamic quality control: quantitative plausibility control with typical value ranges. Neurourol Urodyn 18(abstract 99a): 365–366. , , .
- 2002. Standardisation of urethral pressure measurement: Report of the sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn 21: 258–60. , , , , , , , .
- 1987. Urodynamic equipment: technical aspects. J Med Eng Tech 11: 57–64. , , , , .
- 2000. Standardisation of ambulatory urodynamic monitoring: Report of the standardisation sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn 19: 113–125. , , , , , , , .