• 1
    Homma Y, Batista JE, Bauer SB, et al. Recommendations of the International Scientific Committee: The evaluation and treatment of urinary incontinence. In: AbramsP, CardozoL, KhouryS, WeinA, editors. First International Consultation on Incontinence. Plymouth, UK: Health Publication Ltd.; 1999. pp 35599.
  • 2
    Homma Y, Batista J, Bauer S, et al. Urodynamics. In: AbramsP, CardozoL, KhouryS, WeinA, editors. 2nd International Consultation on Incontinence. Plymouth UK: Plymbridge Distributors, Ltd.; 2002. pp 31772.
  • 3
    Griffiths D, Kondo A, Bauer S, et al. Dynamic testing. In: AbramsP, CardozoL, KhouryS, WeinA, editors. Incontinence 3rd International Consultation on Incontinence. 21 (Paris) Plymouth, England: Health Publication Ltd.; 2005 pp 585673.
  • 4
    Hosker GL, Rosier PFWM, Gajewski GB, et al. The 4th International Consultation on Incontinence 2008. In: AbramsP, CardozoL, KhouryS, WeinA, editors. Committee 6 on: ‘Dynamic Testing’, for urinary incontinence and for fecal incontinence. Plymouth UK: Health Publication Ltd.; 2009. pp 413522.
  • 5
    Nakaji S, Fukuda S, Iwane S, et al. New method for the determination of faecal consistency and its optimal value in the general population. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2002; 17: 127882.
  • 6
    Fernandez-Fraga X, Azpiroz F, Malagelada JR. Significance of pelvic floor muscles in anal incontinence. Gastroenterology 2002; 123: 144150.
  • 7
    Barnett JL, Hasler WL, Camilleri M. American Gastroenterological Association medical position statement on anorectal testing techniques. American Gastroenterological Association. Gastroenterology 1999; 116: 73260.
  • 8
    Deutekom M, Dobben AC, Terra MP, et al. Clinical presentation of faecal incontinence and anorectal function: What is the relationship? Am J Gastroenterol 2007; 102: 35161.
    Direct Link:
  • 9
    Bharucha AE. Outcome measures for faecal incontinence: Anorectal structure and function. Gastroenterology 2004; 126: S908.
  • 10
    Liu J, Guaderrama N, Nager CW, et al. Functional correlates of anal canal anatomy: Puborectalis muscle and anal canal pressure. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 10927.
    Direct Link:
  • 11
    Yamana T, Oya M, Komatsu J, et al. Preoperative anal sphincter high pressure zone, maximum tolerable volume, and anal mucosal electrosensitivity predict early postoperative defaecatory function after low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 1999; 42: 114551.
  • 12
    Bilali S, Pfeifer J. Anorectal manometry: Are fatigue rate and fatigue rate index of any clinical importance? Tech Coloproctol 2005; 9: 2258.
  • 13
    Marcello PW, Barrett RC, Coller JA, et al. Fatigue rate index as a new measurement of external sphincter function. Dis Colon Rectum 1998; 41: 33643.
  • 14
    Rao SS, Hatfield R, Soffer E, et al. Manometric tests of anorectal function in healthy adults. Am J Gastroenterol 1999; 94: 77383.
    Direct Link:
  • 15
    Zbar AP, Kmiot WA, Aslam M, et al. Use of vector volume manometry and endoanal magnetic resonance imaging in the adult female for assessment of anal sphincter dysfunction. Dis Colon Rectum 1999; 42: 14118.
  • 16
    Fynes MM, Behan M, O'Herlihy C, et al. Anal vector volume analysis complements endoanal ultrasonographic assessment of postpartum anal sphincter injury. Br J Surg 2000; 87: 120914.
  • 17
    Ferguson GH, Redford J, Barrett JA, et al. The appreciation of rectal distension in faecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 1989; 32: 9647.
  • 18
    Parellada CM, Miller AS, Williamson ME, et al. Paradoxical high anal resting pressures in men with idiopathic faecal seepage. Dis Colon Rectum 1998; 41: 5937.
  • 19
    Hoffmann BA, Timmcke AE, Gathright JB Jr, et al. Faecal seepage and soiling: A problem of rectal sensation. Dis Colon Rectum 1995; 38: 7468.
  • 20
    Broens PM, Penninckx FM. Relation between anal electrosensitivity and rectal filling sensation and the influence of age. Dis Colon Rectum 2005; 48: 12733.
  • 21
    Miller R, Lewis GT, Bartolo DC, et al. Sensory discrimination and dynamic activity in the anorectum: Evidence using a new ambulatory technique. Br J Surg 1988; 75: 10037.
  • 22
    Kouraklis G, Andromanakos N. Evaluating patients with anorectal incontinence. Surg Today 2004; 34: 30412. Review
  • 23
    Munasinghe BN, Geethani Rathnayaka MM, et al. Biofeedback with and without surgery for faecal incontinence improves maximum squeeze pressure, saline retention capacity and quality of life. Indian J Gastroenterol 2008; 27: 57.
  • 24
    Salvioli B, Bharucha AE, Rath-Harvey D, et al. Rectal compliance, capacity, and rectoanal sensation in faecal incontinence. Am J Gastroenterol 2001; 96: 215868.
    Direct Link:
  • 25
    Lefaucheur JP. Neurophysiological testing in anorectal disorders. Muscle Nerve 2006; 33: 32433.
  • 26
    Kiff ES, Swash M. Slowed conduction in the pudendal nerves in idiopathic (neurogenic) faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 1984; 71: 6146.
  • 27
    Gregory WT, Lou JS, Simmons K, et al. Quantitative anal sphincter electromyography in primiparous women with anal incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 198: 550 el-6.
  • 28
    Gregory WT, Clark AL, Simmons K, et al. Determining the shape of the turns-amplitude cloud during anal sphincter quantitative EMG. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2008; 19: 9716.
  • 29
    Wald A. Clinical practice: Faecal incontinence in adults. N Engl J Med 2007; 356: 16481655.
  • 30
    Saigusa N, Belin BM, Choi HJ, et al. Recovery of the rectoanal inhibitory reflex after restorative proctocolectomy: Does it correlate with nocturnal continence? Dis Colon Rectum 2003; 46: 16872.
  • 31
    Andromanakos N, Skandalakis P, Troupis T, et al. Constipation of anorectal outlet obstruction: Pathophysiology, evaluation and management. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006; 21: 63846.
  • 32
    Thekkinkattil DK, Lim M, Stojkovic SG, et al. A classification, system for faecal incontinence based on anorectal investigations. Br J Surg 2008; 95: 2228.
  • 33
    Pehl C, Enck P, Franke A, et al. German Society for Neurogastroenterology and Motility; Commission Proctology of the German Society for Digestive and Metabolic Diseases; German Society for Coloprotology; Surgical Working Group Coloproctology of the German Society for Visceral Surgery on Anorectal Manometry in Adults, [Anorectal manometry]. Z Gastroenterol 2007; 45: 397417.
  • 34
    Keighley MR, Henry MM, Bartolo DC, et al. Anorectal physiology measurement: Report of a working party. Br J Surg 1989; 76: 3567.
  • 35
    Kouraklis G, Andromanakos N. Evaluating patients with anorectal incontinence. Surg Today 2004; 34: 30412.
  • 36
    Rao SS, Sun WM. Current techniques of assessing defaecation dynamics. Dig Dis 1997; 15: 6477.
  • 37
    Bharucha AE. Update of tests of colon and rectal structure and function. J Clin Gastroenterol 2006; 40: 96103.
  • 38
    Azpiroz F, Enck P, Whitehead WE. Anorectal functional testing: Review of collective experience. Am J Gastroenterol 2002; 97: 23240.
  • 39
    Tubaro A, Artibani W, Bartram C, et al. Imaging, neurophysiology and other tests. In: AbramsP, CardozoL, KhouryS, WeinA, editors. The 4th International Consultation on Incontinence 2008. Plymouth UK: Health Publication Ltd; 2009. pp 545630.