Exploratory factory analysis and predicted probabilities of a Chinese version of Dysfunctional Voiding Symptom Score (DVSS) questionnaire

Authors

  • Shang-Jen Chang,

    1. Division of Urology, Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital, Taipei Branch, Taipei, Taiwan
    2. Medical College of Buddhist Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
    3. Division of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Tony Hsiu-Hsi Chen,

    1. Division of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Chia-Cheng Su,

    1. Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Stephen Shei-Dei Yang

    Corresponding author
    1. Division of Urology, Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital, Taipei Branch, Taipei, Taiwan
    2. Medical College of Buddhist Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
    • 16F, No.289, Jianguo Rd., Xindian Dist., New Taipei City 231, Taiwan (R.O.C).
    Search for more papers by this author

  • Mickey Karram led the peer-review process as the Associate Editor responsible for the paper.

  • Conflict of interest: none.

Abstract

Aims

To evaluate the reliability, validity, and predicted probabilities of a Chinese version of the Dysfunctional Voiding Symptom Score (DVSS) and to explore the latent factors underlying dysfunctional voiding.

Materials and Methods

We enrolled 60 children (38 girls and 22 boys) with a diagnosis of dysfunctional voiding. The Chinese version of the DVSS was completed at the clinics and again 1 week later. We enrolled 235 age- and gender-matched healthy children as the control group. The DVSS consisted of 10 items with each item scores 0–3. The internal consistency and test–retest reliability was assessed with Chronbach's alpha test and intraclass correlation (ICC), respectively. The predictive validity was analyzed using logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Factor analysis was used to classify symptoms into latent factors. The Bayesian method was used to adjust the predicted probabilities of the DVSS.

Results

Mean total scores of the DVSS in the cases and controls were 9.65 ± 3.87 and 4.13 ± 2.60, respectively. The alpha coefficient was 0.448, showing a heterogeneous composition of symptoms. Test–retest reliability was 0.89. The chosen cut-off point for the total score of DVSS was 6.66, with a sensitivity of 81.67%, and specificity of 82.63%. Factor analysis revealed three latent variables. Using the Bayesian method, the application of the DVSS in areas with different prevalence figures produced significantly different probabilities of dysfunctional voiding.

Conclusions

The Chinese version of the DVSS is reliable with validity. With the same total score, we found significantly different predicted probabilities of dysfunctional voiding. Neurourol. Urodynam. 31:1247–1251, 2012. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Ancillary