SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • 1
    McGrother CW, Donaldson MM, Shaw C, et al. Storage symptoms of the bladder: Prevalence, incidence and need for services in the UK. BJU Int 2004;93:7639.
  • 2
    Hannestad YS, Rortveit G, Sandvik H, et al. A community-based epidemiological survey of female urinary incontinence: The Norwegian EPINCONT study. epidemiology of incontinence in the County of Nord-Trondelag. J Clin Epidemiol 2000;53:11507.
  • 3
    National Institute for Health & Clinical Excellence. Urinary incontinence: Costing report—Implementing NICE guidance in England. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence; 2006.
  • 4
    Adekanmi OA, Edwards GJ, Barrington JW. The variation in urodynamic practice in the United Kingdom. J Obstet Gynecol 2002;22:4850.
  • 5
    National Collaborating Centre for Women's & Children's Health. Urinary incontinence—The management of urinary incontinence in women. London: Commissioned by the National Institute for Health & Clinical Excellence; 2006.
  • 6
    Martin JL, Williams KS, Abrahams KR, et al. Systematic review and evaluation of methods of assessing urinary incontinence. Health Technol Assess 2006;10:iiv; 1–132.
  • 7
    Glazener CMA, Lapitan MCM. Urodynamic studies for management of urinary incontinence in children and adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; Art. No.: CD003195.
  • 8
    Griffiths D, Kondo A, Bauer S, et al. Dynamic testing. In: Abrams P, Cardozo L, Khoury S, Wein A, editors. Incontinence—3rd International Consultation on Incontinence. Plymouth: Health Publications Ltd.; 2005. 585674.
  • 9
    Homma Y, Battista J, Bauer S, et al. Urodynamics. In: Abrams P, Khoury S, editors. Incontinence—1st International Consultation on Incontinence. 1st edition. Plymouth, UK: Health Publications Ltd.; 1999. 35399.
  • 10
    Homma Y, Battista J, Bauer S, et al. Urodynamics. In: Abrams P, Cardozo L, Khoury S, Wein A, editors. Incontinence—2nd International Consultation on Incontinence. 2nd edition. Plymouth, UK: Health Publications Ltd.; 2002. 31772.
  • 11
    Hosker G, Rosier P, Gajewski J, et al. Dynamic testing. In: Abrams P, Cardozo L, Khoury S, Wein A, editors. Incontinence—4th International Consultation on Incontinence. Plymouth: Health Publications Ltd.; 2009. 413522.
  • 12
    Buckley BS, Grant AM, Tincello DG, et al. Prioritising reseach: Patients, carers and clinicians working together to identify and prioritise clinical uncertainties in urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 2010;29:70814.
  • 13
    James Lind Alliance. Urinary incontinence—Tackling uncertainties together. Report of the final priority setting workshop November 6, 2008 2009. Available from: http://www.lindalliance.org/pdfs/UI/PSP%20evaluation_UI_final.pdf
  • 14
    Murdoch M, McColl EM, Howel D, et al. INVESTIGATE-I (INVasive Evaluation before Surgical Treatment of Incontinence Gives Added Therapeutic Effect?): Study protocol for a mixed methods study to assess the feasibility of a future randomised controlled trial of the clinical utility of invasive urodynamic testing. Trials 2011;12:169 [Open access]. Available from: http://www.trialsjournal.com/content/12/1/169.
  • 15
    INVESTIGATE trials group. INVasive Evaluation before Surgical Treatment for Incontinence Gives Added Therapeutic Effect? 2010. [15/06/2012]; Available from: http://www.investigate-trial.com/INVESTIGATE-trial/INVESTIGATE-I.html.
  • 16
    Young JM, Solomon MJ, Harrison JD, et al. Measuring patient preference and surgeon choice. Surgery 2008;143:5828.
  • 17
    Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine; 1967.
  • 18
    Auwad W, Freeman RM, Swift S. Is the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system (POPQ) being used? A survey of members of the International Continence Society (ICS) and the American Urogynecologic Society (AUGS). Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2004;15:3247.
  • 19
    Basu M, Duckett JR, Moran P, et al. Clinicians' views on the NICE guideline on the management of female urinary incontinence. J Obstet Gynaecol 2009;29:52932.
  • 20
    Cartwright R, Cardozo L. Usage of International Continence Society standardized terminology: A bibliometric and questionnaire study. Neurourol Urodyn 2010;29:13739.
  • 21
    Roos AM, Thakar R, Sultan AH, et al. Female sexual dysfunction: Are urogynecologists ready for it? Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2009;20:89101.
  • 22
    Edwards PJ, Roberts I, Clarke MJ, et al. Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009; Art. No.: MR000008.
  • 23
    McColl E, Jacoby A, Thomas L, et al. Design and use of questionnaires: a review of best practice applicable to surveys of health service staff and patients. Health Technol Assess 2001;5.
  • 24
    Bakali E, Pitchforth E, Tincello DG, et al. Clinicians' views on the feasibility of surgical randomized trials in urogynecology: Results of a questionnaire survey. Neurourol Urodyn 2011;30:6974.
  • 25
    Freedman B. Equipoise and the ethics of clinical research. N Engl J Med 1987;317:1415.
  • 26
    Weber AM, Taylor RJ, Wei JT, et al. The cost-effectiveness of preoperative testing (basic office assessment vs. urodynamics) for stress urinary incontinence in women. BJU Int 2002;89:35663.
  • 27
    National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. The guidelines manual. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence; 2012. Available from: http://www.nice.org.uk.
  • 28
    Ward K, Hilton P. Multicentre randomised trial of TVT, colposuspension: 5-year follow-up. BJOG 2008;115:22633.
  • 29
    Ramsay IN, Ali HM, Hunter M, et al. A randomized controlled trial of urodynamic investigations prior to conservative treatment of urinary incontinence in the female. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 1995;6:27781.
  • 30
    Black N, Griffiths J, Pope C, et al. Impact of surgery for stress incontinence on morbidity: Cohort study. BMJ 1997;315:14938.
  • 31
    Anger JT, Rodriguez LV, Wang Q, et al. The role of preoperative testing on outcomes after sling surgery for stress urinary incontinence. J Urol 2007;178:13648.
  • 32
    Lemack GE, Krauss S, Litman H, et al. Normal preoperative urodynamic testing does not predict voiding dysfunction after Burch colposuspension versus pubovaginal sling. J Urol 2008;180:207680.
  • 33
    Nager CW, FitzGerald M, Kraus SR, et al. Urodynamic measures do not predict stress continence outcomes after surgery for stress urinary incontinence in selected women. J Urol 2008;179:14704.
  • 34
    Nager CW, Brubaker L, Litman HJ, et al. A randomized trial of urodynamic testing before stress-incontinence surgery. N Engl J Med 2012;366:198797.
  • 35
    van Leijsen SA, Kluivers KB, Mol BW, et al. Can preoperative urodynamic investigation be omitted in women with stress urinary incontinence? A non-inferiority randomized controlled trial. Neurourol Urodyn 2012;31:111823.