Robert Pickard led the peer-review process as the Associate Editor responsible for the paper.
Article first published online: 28 SEP 2012
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Neurourology and Urodynamics
Volume 31, Issue 8, pages 1223–1230, November 2012
How to Cite
Hilton, P., Bryant, A., Howel, D., McColl, E., Buckley, B. S., Lucas, M., Tincello, D. G. and Armstrong, N. (2012), Assessing professional equipoise and views about a future clinical trial of invasive urodynamics prior to surgery for stress urinary incontinence in women: A survey within a mixed methods feasibility study. Neurourol. Urodyn., 31: 1223–1230. doi: 10.1002/nau.22328
Conflict of interest: none.
Ethical Approval: Favorable ethical opinion was received from Newcastle and North Tyneside No.1 Research Ethics committee on 06/01/2011 (their minute reference: 10/H0906/76).
P.H.: No current financial interests; previous chair of NICE Guideline Development Group (GDG) on urinary incontinence (UI) in women; previous member NETSCC-HTA Interventional Procedures Panel, and Clinical Evaluations and Trials Prioritization Group; previous commercial research funding for trials of surgery for stress incontinence from Gynecare (1998–2003) and Gyne Ideas (now Mpathy Medical; 2001–2003). M.L.: No current financial interests; previous member of NICE GDG on UI in women and on lower urinary tract symptoms in men; chair European Association of Urology guideline group on UI. D.G.T.: Consultancy work for Pfizer, Ethicon, Galen; research grants from Ethicon, Astellas. Chair of BSUG Research Committee. Executive Editor of BJOG, Vice-chairman of the Wellbeing of Women Research Advisory Committee. A.B., D.H., E.M., B.B., N.A.: None.
Author's Contributions: P.H. is the lead grant holder, he conceived the study, led on the protocol development, questionnaire design and writing the manuscript, and approved the final version for publication. D.H., E.M., B.B., M.L., D.G.T., N.A. are co-holders of the grant, contributed to protocol development and to writing the manuscript, and approved the final version for publication. E.M.: additionally led on questionnaire formatting. A.B., D.H.: additionally undertook the statistical analysis. N.A.: additionally led on the interview study.
“Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Terms and Conditions set out at http://wileyonlinelibrary.com/onlineopen#OnlineOpen_Terms”.
- Issue published online: 17 OCT 2012
- Article first published online: 28 SEP 2012
- Manuscript Accepted: 3 SEP 2012
- Manuscript Received: 23 JUN 2012
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)
- 3National Institute for Health & Clinical Excellence. Urinary incontinence: Costing report—Implementing NICE guidance in England. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence; 2006.
- 5National Collaborating Centre for Women's & Children's Health. Urinary incontinence—The management of urinary incontinence in women. London: Commissioned by the National Institute for Health & Clinical Excellence; 2006.
- 6Systematic review and evaluation of methods of assessing urinary incontinence. Health Technol Assess 2006;10:i–iv; 1–132., , , et al.
- 7Urodynamic studies for management of urinary incontinence in children and adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; Art. No.: CD003195., .
- 8Dynamic testing. In: Abrams P, Cardozo L, Khoury S, Wein A, editors. Incontinence—3rd International Consultation on Incontinence. Plymouth: Health Publications Ltd.; 2005. 585–674., , , et al.
- 9Urodynamics. In: Abrams P, Khoury S, editors. Incontinence—1st International Consultation on Incontinence. 1st edition. Plymouth, UK: Health Publications Ltd.; 1999. 353–99., , , et al.
- 10Urodynamics. In: Abrams P, Cardozo L, Khoury S, Wein A, editors. Incontinence—2nd International Consultation on Incontinence. 2nd edition. Plymouth, UK: Health Publications Ltd.; 2002. 317–72., , , et al.
- 11Dynamic testing. In: Abrams P, Cardozo L, Khoury S, Wein A, editors. Incontinence—4th International Consultation on Incontinence. Plymouth: Health Publications Ltd.; 2009. 413–522., , , et al.
- 13James Lind Alliance. Urinary incontinence—Tackling uncertainties together. Report of the final priority setting workshop November 6, 2008 2009. Available from: http://www.lindalliance.org/pdfs/UI/PSP%20evaluation_UI_final.pdf
- 14INVESTIGATE-I (INVasive Evaluation before Surgical Treatment of Incontinence Gives Added Therapeutic Effect?): Study protocol for a mixed methods study to assess the feasibility of a future randomised controlled trial of the clinical utility of invasive urodynamic testing. Trials 2011;12:169 [Open access]. Available from: http://www.trialsjournal.com/content/12/1/169., , , et al.
- 15INVESTIGATE trials group. INVasive Evaluation before Surgical Treatment for Incontinence Gives Added Therapeutic Effect? 2010. [15/06/2012]; Available from: http://www.investigate-trial.com/INVESTIGATE-trial/INVESTIGATE-I.html.
- 17The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine; 1967., .
- 22Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009; Art. No.: MR000008., , , et al.
- 23Design and use of questionnaires: a review of best practice applicable to surveys of health service staff and patients. Health Technol Assess 2001;5., , , et al.
- 27National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. The guidelines manual. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence; 2012. Available from: http://www.nice.org.uk.
- 29A randomized controlled trial of urodynamic investigations prior to conservative treatment of urinary incontinence in the female. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 1995;6:277–81., , , et al.