Get access

Challenges and current evidence on the management of bladder pain syndrome

Authors

  • Eleftheria L. Chrysanthopoulou MD, MSc,

    1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St George's Healthcare NHS Trust/St George's University of London, London, United Kingdom
    Search for more papers by this author
    • Clinical Fellow.
  • Stergios K. Doumouchtsis MSc, MPH, PhD, MRCOG

    Search for more papers by this author
    • Consultant Obstetrician & Gynaecologist, RCOG accredited Subspecialist in Urogynaecology, Honorary Senior Lecturer Lead Consultant for Urogynaecology and Childbirth Injury—Pelvic Health after Childbirth Services.

  • Roger Dmochowski led the peer-review process as the Associate Editor responsible for the paper.
  • Financial Disclaimer/Conflict of Interest: S.K. Doumouchtsis: Astellas Pfizer, Boston Scientific.
  • Contribution to Manuscript: S.K. Doumouchtsis: Project development, Data collection, Manuscript writing; E.L. Chrysanthopoulou: Data collection, Manuscript writing.

Correspondence to: Stergios K. Doumouchtsis, Ph.D., MRCOG, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St George's Healthcare NHS Trust/St George's University of London, Level 4 Lanesborough Wing, Blackshaw Road, SW17 0QT London, United Kingdom. E-mail: sdoum@yahoo.com

Abstract

Introduction

Bladder pain syndrome (BPS) is an enigmatic condition, which can be debilitating for the patients, affecting their quality of life. Its prevalence is believed to have become markedly higher (100–300/100,000 women) than in previous years. Its etiology and pathogenesis remain unknown, and a number of theories based on clinical and experimental observations have been developed. It is difficult to be diagnosed and treated. There is a worldwide effort to standardize its nomenclature, definition, diagnosis, and treatment algorithm. The aim of this review is to critically appraise the current evidence on the diagnosis and management of BPS.

Methods

We performed a review of the literature (Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane, Google Scholar, conference proceedings) as well as consensus statements and guidelines from relevant professional societies. We have critically compared these statements and guidelines with emphasis on the controversies.

Results

Patients may experience pain and lower urinary tract symptoms for a long time before diagnosis, affecting their mental health and work, causing stress, sleep disturbance, depression, and sexual dysfunction. BPS has been considered as one of a group of chronic pain syndromes rather than as primarily an inflammatory bladder disorder. Despite the wide range of treatments, most are empirical and inadequate, usually offering just symptom relief. There is often delay in commencing treatment, and this may result in worse prognosis.

Conclusion

Efforts are focused on different pathways for the early identification of this syndrome, trying to elucidate the pathogenetic mechanism, as well as introducing effective treatments. Neurourol. Urodynam. 33:1193–1201, 2014. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Ancillary