Stochastic programming models for replication of electricity forward contracts for industry
Article first published online: 7 AUG 2006
DOI: 10.1002/nav.20185
Copyright © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Issue
1520-6750/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=1bdad4849bee8229bbc4053fa1d796b87c453243)
Naval Research Logistics (NRL)
Special Issue: Special Issue on Applications of Financial Engineering in Operations, Production, Services, Logistics, and Management
Volume 53, Issue 7, pages 713–726, October 2006
Additional Information
How to Cite
Kwon, R. H., Scott Rogers, J. and Yau, S. (2006), Stochastic programming models for replication of electricity forward contracts for industry. Naval Research Logistics, 53: 713–726. doi: 10.1002/nav.20185
Publication History
- Issue published online: 29 AUG 2006
- Article first published online: 7 AUG 2006
- Manuscript Accepted: 10 JUN 2006
- Manuscript Revised: 16 DEC 2005
- Manuscript Received: 3 MAR 2005
Funded by
- National Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada
- Abstract
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- electricity contracts;
- portfolio replication;
- stochastic programming
Abstract
Forward contracts for electricity are valuable to consumers (suppliers) that wish to obtain (sell) power at prices that are more stable than those typically seen in electricity markets. Only a limited variety of forward contracts are available on the market so the need is for a “custom” contract that meets a specific profile of electricity requirements (usually uncertain) over time. This paper develops stochastic programming models that can be used by the supplier of a custom contract to design a procurement strategy that minimizes its expected costs of supply in meeting contract obligations. The procurement strategy will consist of a mix of forwards available in the market, and, in each period, blending its own generation with spot purchases of power. The model also integrates spot selling of power. We consider that expected spot prices and forward prices may disagree since electricity is not storable, creating apparent arbitrage opportunities. We bound the transaction amounts to limit effects of apparent arbitrage and for consistency with the assumption of constant variable generation costs and market prices. For sample cases we compute the optimal procurement strategy, demonstrate the magnitude of the saving, and illustrate the sensitivity of this saving to the magnitude of the upper bounds on the allowed forward positions (a proxy for risk). © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Naval Research Logistics, 2006

1520-6750/asset/NAV_left.gif?v=1&s=23e2ded0809abfc3ed47247eefb801bfed0ff239)