Research Article
Sex and species differences in neuromodulatory input to a premotor nucleus: A comparative study of substance P and communication behavior in weakly electric fish
Article first published online: 27 OCT 2004
DOI: 10.1002/neu.20095
Copyright © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Additional Information
How to Cite
Kolodziejski, J. A., Nelson, B. S. and Smith, G. T. (2005), Sex and species differences in neuromodulatory input to a premotor nucleus: A comparative study of substance P and communication behavior in weakly electric fish. J. Neurobiol., 62: 299–315. doi: 10.1002/neu.20095
Publication History
- Issue published online: 7 JAN 2005
- Article first published online: 27 OCT 2004
- Manuscript Accepted: 22 JUN 2004
- Manuscript Received: 27 MAY 2004
Funded by
- NIH. Grant Number: MH 066960
- Center for the Integrative Study of Animal Behavior
- Abstract
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- Apteronotus;
- chirp;
- central posterior/prepacemaker nucleus (CP/PPn);
- sexual dimorphism;
- electric organ discharge (EOD)
Abstract
Many electric fish species modulate their electric organ discharges (EODs) to produce transient social signals that vary in number and structure. In Apteronotus leptorhynchus, males modulate their EOD more often than females, whereas in Apteronotus albifrons, males and females produce similar numbers of modulations. Sex differences in the number of EOD modulations in A. leptorhynchus are associated with sex differences in substance P in the diencephalic nucleus that controls transient EOD modulations, the CP/PPn. These sex differences in substance P have been hypothesized to regulate sex differences in the production of EOD modulations. To comparatively test this hypothesis, we examined substance P immunoreactivity in the CP/PPn of male and female A. leptorhynchus and A. albifrons. Because the number of EOD modulations is sexually monomorphic in A. albifrons, we predicted no sex difference in substance P in the CP/PPn of this species. Contrary to this prediction, male A. albifrons had significantly more substance P in the CP/PPn than females. This suggests that sex differences in substance P are not sufficient for controlling sex differences in the number of EOD modulations. Modulation structure (frequency excursion and/or duration), however, is also sexually dimorphic in A. leptorhynchus and is another possible behavioral correlate of the sexually dimorphic distribution of substance P. The present study found pronounced sex differences in the structure of EOD modulations in A. albifrons similar to those in A. leptorhynchus. Thus, sex differences in substance P may influence sex differences in the structure, rather than the number, of EOD modulations. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Neurobiol, 2005

1932-846X/asset/NEU_left.gif?v=1&s=fa3435fc99d6ef80f2fed53e67b3501cc978cb90)
