Formulation and sequential numerical algorithms of coupled fluid/heat flow and geomechanics for multiple porosity materials
Article first published online: 20 JUN 2012
Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering
Volume 92, Issue 5, pages 425–456, 02 November 2012
How to Cite
Kim, J., Sonnenthal, E. L. and Rutqvist, J. (2012), Formulation and sequential numerical algorithms of coupled fluid/heat flow and geomechanics for multiple porosity materials. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Engng., 92: 425–456. doi: 10.1002/nme.4340
- Issue published online: 15 OCT 2012
- Article first published online: 20 JUN 2012
- Manuscript Accepted: 26 MAR 2012
- Manuscript Revised: 22 MAR 2012
- Manuscript Received: 7 NOV 2011
- double porosity;
- multiple porosity;
- multiple interacting continua (MINC);
- fractured reservoirs;
- fixed-stress split
We extend constitutive relations of coupled flow and geomechanics for the isothermal elastic double porosity model by Berryman [Journal of Engineering Mechanics ASCE 2002; 128(8):840–847] in the previous study to those for the nonisothermal elastic/elastoplastic multiple porosity model, finding coupling coefficients and constraints of the multiple porosity model and determining the upscaled elastic/elastoplastic moduli as well as relations between the local strains of all materials within a gridblock and the global strain of the gridblock. Furthermore, the coupling equations and relations between local and global variables provide well-posed problems, implying that they honor the dissipative mechanism of coupled flow and geomechanics. For numerical implementation, we modify the fixed-stress sequential method for the multiple porosity model. From the a priori stability estimate, the sequential method provides numerical stability when an implicit time-stepping algorithm is used. This sequential scheme can easily be implemented by using a modified porosity function and its porosity correction.
In numerical examples, we observe clear differences among the single, double, and multiple porosity systems, and the multiple porosity model can reflect the substantial heterogeneity that exists within a gridblock. We also identify considerably complicated physics in coupled flow and geomechanics of the multiple porosity systems, which cannot accurately be detected in the uncoupled flow simulation. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.