Focus on Research Methods

You have free access to this content

Real qualitative researchers do not count: The use of numbers in qualitative research

  1. Margarete Sandelowski*

Article first published online: 18 JUL 2001

DOI: 10.1002/nur.1025

Issue

Research in Nursing & Health

Research in Nursing & Health

Volume 24, Issue 3, pages 230–240, June 2001

Additional Information

How to Cite

Sandelowski, M. (2001), Real qualitative researchers do not count: The use of numbers in qualitative research. Res. Nurs. Health, 24: 230–240. doi: 10.1002/nur.1025

Author Information

  1. University of North Carolina–Chapel Hill, School of Nursing, #7460 Carrington Hall, Chapel Hill, NC 27599

*University of North Carolina–Chapel Hill, School of Nursing, #7460 Carrington Hall, Chapel Hill, NC 27599

Publication History

  1. Issue published online: 18 JUL 2001
  2. Article first published online: 18 JUL 2001
  3. Manuscript Accepted: 12 JAN 2001
  4. Manuscript Received: 24 AUG 2000

SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

ARTICLE TOOLS

Get PDF (151K)

REFERENCES

  • Bailey, D. (2000). Nurse work and the computerized patient record. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill.
  • Bauer, M.W., Gaskell, G., & Allum, N.C. (2000). Quality, quantity and knowledge interests: Avoiding confusions. In M.W.Bauer & G.Gaskell (Eds.), Qualitative researching with text, image and sound: A practical handbook (pp. 3–17). London: Sage.
  • Blaxter, M. (1983). The causes of disease: Women talking. Social Science & Medicine, 17, 59–69.
  • Borkan, J.M., Quirk, M., & Sullivan, M. (1991). Finding meaning after the fall: Injury narratives from elderly hip fracture patients. Social Science & Medicine, 33, 947–957.
  • Boyatzis, R.E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Chibnik, M. (1999). Quantification and statistics in six anthropology journals. Field Methods, 11, 146–157.
  • Cohen, M. Z., Tripp-Reimer, T., Smith, C., Sorofman, B., & Lively, S. (1994). Explanatory models of diabetes: Patient practitioner variation. Social Science & Medicine, 38, 59–66.
  • Dey, I. (1993). Qualitative data analysis: A user-friendly guide for social scientists. London: Routledge.
  • Ford-Gilboe, M., Campbell, J., & Berman, H. (1995). Stories and numbers: Coexistence without compromise. ANS: Advances in Nursing Science, 18, 14–26.
  • Greenhalgh, T., & Taylor, R. (1997). How to read a paper: Papers that go beyond numbers (qualitative research). British Medical Journal, 315(7110), 740–743.
  • John, I.D. (1992). Statistics as rhetoric in psychology. Australian Psychologist, 27, 144–149.
    Direct Link:
  • Koenig, B.A. (1988). The technological imperative in medical practice: The social creation of a “routine” treatment. In M.Lock & D.Gordon (Eds.), Biomedicine examined (pp. 465–496). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
  • LeCompte, M.D., & Schensul, J. J. (1999). Analyzing and interpreting ethnographic data: Ethnographer's toolkit 5. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.
  • Linnekin, J. (1987). Categorize, cannibalize? Humanistic quantification in anthropological research. American Anthropologist, 89, 920–926.
    Direct Link:
  • Maxwell, J.A. (1992). Understanding and validity in qualitative research. Harvard Educational Review, 62, 279–299.
  • Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Olson, T. (2000). Numbers, narratives, and nursing history. Social Science Journal, 37, 137–144.
  • Rodgers, B.L., & Cowles, K. V. (1993). The qualitative research audit trail: A complex collection of documentation. Research in Nursing & Health, 16, 219–226.
    Direct Link:
  • Rossman, G.B., & Wilson, B.L. (1994). Numbers and words revisited: Being “shamelessly eclectic”. Quality & Quantity, 28, 315–327.
  • Ryan, G.W., & Bernard, H.R. (2000). Data management and analysis methods. In N.K.Denzin & Y.S.Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research, 2nd ed. (pp. 769–802). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Sandelowski, M. (1993). With child in mind: Studies of the personal encounter with infertility. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
  • Sandelowski, M., & Jones, L.C. (1996a). “Healing fictions”: Stories of choosing in the aftermath of the detection of fetal anomalies. Social Science & Medicine, 42, 353–361.
  • Sandelowski, M., & Jones, L.C. (1996b). Couples' evaluations of foreknowledge of fetal impairment. Clinical Nursing Research, 5, 81–96.
  • Seale, C. (1999). The quality of qualitative research. London: Sage.
  • Seals, B.F., Sowell, R.L., Demi, A. S., Moneyham, L., Cohen, L., & Guillory, J. (1995). Falling through the cracks: Social service concerns of women infected with HIV. Qualitative Health Research, 5, 496–515.
  • Simon, C.M. (1999). Images and image: Technology and the social politics of revealing disorder in a North American hospital. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 13, 141–162.
    Direct Link:
  • Stern, P.N. (1989). Are counting and coding a cappella appropriate in qualitative research?. In J.M.Morse (Ed.), Qualitative nursing research: A contemporary dialogue (pp. 135–148). Rockville, MD: Aspen.
  • Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (1998). Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Timmermans, S. (1997). High touch in high tech: The presence of relatives and friends during resuscitative efforts. Scholarly Inquiry for Nursing Practice, 11, 153–173.
Get PDF (151K)