SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Included in metasummary: Qualitative report; +Quantitative report; *+Mixed methods report
  • *Abel, E., & Painter, L. (2003). Factors that influence adherence to HIV medications: Perceptions of women and health care providers. Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care, 14, 6169.
  • Alderson, P., Green, S., & Higgins, J.P.T. (Eds.). (2004, March). Cochrane reviewers' handbook 4.2.2 [updated quarterly]. In The Cochrane Library, Issue 1, 2004. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Retrieved 5/11/04 from http://www.cochrane.org/resources/handbook/hbook.htm
  • Barroso, J., Sandelowski, M., & Voils, C.I. (2006). Research results have expiration dates: Ensuring timely systematic reviews. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 12, 454462.
  • Bennett, J.A. (2005). The consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT): Guidelines for reporting randomized trials. Nursing Research, 54, 128132.
  • Conn, V.S., & Rantz, M.J. (2003). Research methods: Managing primary study quality in meta-analyses. Research in Nursing & Health, 26, 322333.
  • Cooper, H. (1998). Synthesizing research: A guide for literature reviews (3rd ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • +Durante, A.J., Bova, C.A., Fennie, K.P., Danvers, K.A., Holness, D.R., Burgess, J.D., et al. (2003). Home-based study of anti-HIV drug regimen adherence among HIV-infected women: Feasibility and preliminary results. AIDS Care, 15, 103115.
  • Edwards, A., Elwyn, G., Hood, K., & Rollnick, S. (2000). Judging the “weight of evidence” in systematic reviews: Introducing rigor into the qualitative overview stage by assessing Signal and Noise. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 6, 177184.
  • Edwards, A.G., Russell, I.T., & Stott, N.C. (1998). Signal versus noise in the evidence base for medicine: An alternative to hierarchies of evidence? Family Practice, 15, 319322.
  • +Erlen, J.A., Sereika, S.M., Cook, R.L., & Hunt, S.C. (2002). Adherence to antiretroviral therapy among women with HIV infection. JOGNN: Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing, 31, 470477.
  • Forbes, A., & Griffiths, P. (2002). Methodological strategies for the identification and synthesis of “evidence” to support decision-making in relation to complex healthcare systems and practices. Nursing Inquiry, 9, 141155.
  • *Fourney, A.M. (1999). Adherence to HIV/AIDS therapies among low-literacy populations: The ALP project. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas-Houston Health Science Center, Houston.
  • *Gant, L.M., & Welch, L.A. (2004). Voices less heard: HIV-positive African American women, medication adherence, sexual abuse, and self-care. Journal of HIV/AIDS and Social Services, 3, 6791.
  • +Garcia-Teague, L.A. (2002). Factors associated with appointment and medication adherence in low-income Latinas living with the human immunodeficiency virus. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of California, Los Angeles.
  • Glass, G.V. (2000). Meta-analysis at 25. Retrieved 12/24/2005 from http://glass.ed.asu.edu/gene/papers/meta25.html
  • Harden, A., & Thomas, J. (2005). Methodological issues in combining diverse study types in systematic reviews. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8, 257271.
  • Hawker, S., Payne, S., Kerr, C., Hardey, M., & Powell, J. (2002). Appraising the evidence: Reviewing the disparate data systematically. Qualitative Health Research, 12, 12841299.
  • Higgins, J.P.T., & Green, S., (Eds.). (2005, May). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions (4.2.5). Retrieved January 15, 2006 from www.cochrane.org/resources/handbook/hbook.htm.
  • +Jones, D.L., Ishii, M., LaPerriere, A., Stanley, H., Antoni, M., Ironson, G., et al. (2003). Influencing medication adherence among women with AIDS. AIDS Care, 15, 463474.
  • Lemmer, B., Grellier, R., & Steven, J. (1999). Systematic review of nonrandom and qualitative research literature: Exploring and uncovering an evidence base for health visiting and decision making. Qualitative Health Research, 9, 315328.
  • Mason, J. (2006). Mixing methods in a qualitatively driven way. Qualitative Research, 6, 925.
  • Maxwell, J.A. (1992). Understanding and validity in qualitative research. Harvard Educational Review, 62, 279300.
  • +Mellins, C.A, Kang, E., Leu, C.S., Havens, J.F., & Chesney, M.A. (2003). Longitudinal study of mental health and psychosocial predictors of medical treatment adherence in mothers living with HIV disease. AIDS Patient Care and STDs, 17, 407416.
  • *Misener, T.R., & Sowell, R.L. (1998). HIV infected women's decisions to take antiretrovirals. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 20, 431447.
  • Noblit, G.W., & Hare, R.D. (1988). Meta-ethnography: Synthesizing qualitative studies. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Ogilvie, D., Egan, M., Hamilton, V., & Petticrew, M. (2005). Systematic reviews of health effects of social interventions: 2. Best available evidence: How low should you go? Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 59, 886892.
  • Onwuegbuzie, A.J. (2003). Effect sizes in qualitative research: A prolegomenon. Quality & Quantity, 37, 393409.
  • Onwuegbuzie, A.J., & Teddlie, C. (2003). A framework for analyzing data in mixed methods research. In A.Tashakkori & C.Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 351351) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2003). Evidence, hierarchies, and typologies: Horses for courses. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 57, 527533.
  • Popay, J., & Roen, K. (2003, May 23). Synthesis of evidence from research using diverse study designs: A preliminary review of methodological work. Unpublished report for the Social Care Institute of Excellence, Lancaster University, UK.
  • *+Powell-Cope G.M., White J., Henkelman, E.J., & Turner, B.J. (2003). Qualitative and quantitative assessments of HAART adherence of substance-abusing women. AIDS Care, 15, 239249.
  • Ragin, C. (2000). Fuzzy-set social science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • *Richter, D.L., Sowell, R.L., & Pluto, D.M. (2002). Attitudes toward antiretroviral therapy among African American women. American Journal of Health Behavior, 26, 2533.
  • *Roberts, K.J., & Mann, T. (2000). Barriers to antiretroviral medication adherence in HIV-infected women. AIDS Care, 12, 377386.
  • *Roberts, K.J., & Mann, T. (2003). Adherence to antiretroviral medications in HIV/AIDS care: A narrative exploration of one woman's foray into intentional nonadherence. Health Care for Women International, 24, 552564.
  • Sandelowski, M. (2000). Whatever happened to qualitative description? Research in Nursing & Health, 23, 334340.
  • Sandelowski, M. (2001). Real qualitative researchers do not count: The use of numbers in qualitative research. Research in Nursing & Health, 24, 230240.
  • Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. (2003a). Classifying the findings in qualitative studies. Qualitative Health Research, 13, 905923.
  • Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. (2003b). Creating metasummaries of qualitative findings. Nursing Research, 52, 226233.
  • Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. (2007). Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research. New York: Springer.
  • Sandelowski, M., Voils, C.I., & Barroso, J. (2006). Defining and designing mixed research synthesis studies. Research in the Schools, 13, 2940.
  • Sandelowski, M., Voils, C.I., & Barroso, J. (In press). Comparability work and the management of difference in research synthesis studies. Social Science & Medicine
  • *Sankar, A., Luborsky, M., Schuman, P., & Roberts, G. (2002). Adherence discourse among African-American women taking HAART. AIDS Care, 14, 203218.
  • *Schrimshaw, E.W., Siegel, K., & Lekas, H.-M. (2005). Changes in attitudes toward antiviral medication: A comparison of women living with HIV/AIDS in the pre-HAART and HAART eras. AIDS and Behavior, 9, 267279.
  • *Siegel, K., & Gorey, E. (1997). HIV-infected women: Barriers to AZT use. Social Science & Medicine, 45, 1522.
  • *Siegel, K., Lekas, H., Schrimshaw, E.W., & Johnson, J.K. (2001). Factors associated with HIV-infected women's use or intention to use AZT during pregnancy. AIDS Education and Prevention, 13, 189206.
  • Sivesind, K.H. (1999). Structured, qualitative comparison: Between singularity and single-dimensionality. Quality & Quantity, 33, 361380.
  • Thorne, S., Jensen, L., Kearney, M.H., Noblit, G., & Sandelowski, M. (2004). Qualitative metasynthesis: Reflections on methodological orientation and ideological agenda. Qualitative Health Research, 14, 13421365.
  • West, S., King, V., Carey, T.S., Lohr, K.N., McKoy, N., Sutton, S.F., et al. (2002). Systems to rate the strength of scientific evidence. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 47, AHRQ Pub. No. 02-E016. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
  • +Wilson, T.E., Ickovics, J.R., Fernandez, M.I., Koenig, L.J., & Walter, E. (2001). Self-Reported zidovudine adherence among pregnant women with human immunodeficiency virus infection in four US states. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 184, 12351240.
  • Wood, M., & Christy, R. (1999). Sampling for possibilities. Quality & Quantity , 33, 185202.
  • *Wood, S.A., Tobias, C., & McCree, J. (2004). Medication adherence for HIV-positive women caring for children: In their own words. AIDS Care, 16, 909913.