SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Agar, M. (2004). We have met the other and we're all nonlinear: Ethnography as a nonlinear dynamic system. Complexity, 10(2), 1624.
  • Alasuutari, P. (1995). Researching culture: Qualitative method and cultural studies. London: Sage.
  • Atkinson, P. (2005). Qualitative research—Unity and diversity. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6(3), Art 26. Retrieved August 25,2009, from http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/4/10.
  • Atkinson, P., & Delamont, S. (2006). In the roiling smoke: Qualitative inquiry and contested fields. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 19, 747755.
  • Barbour, R.S. (2003). The newfound credibility of qualitative research? Tales of technical essentialism and co-option. Qualitative Health Research, 13, 10191027.
  • Becker, H.S. (1996). The epistemology of qualitative research. In: R.Jessir, A.Colby, & R.A.Shweder (Eds.), Ethnography and human development: Context and meaning in social inquiry (pp. 5371). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Bowker, G.C., & Star, S.L. (2000). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Boychuk Duchscher, J.E., & Morgan, D. (2004). Grounded theory: Reflections on the emergence vs. forcing debate. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 48, 605612.
  • Caelli, K., Ray, L., & Mill, J. (2003). “Clear as mud”: Toward greater clarity in generic qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2(2), 113. Retrieved October 4,2009, from http://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php/IJQM/article/view/4521/3651.
  • Chamberlain, K. (2000). Methodolatry and qualitative health research. Journal of Health Psychology, 5, 285296.
  • Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage.
  • Clarke, A.E. (2005). Situational analysis: Grounded theory after the postmodern turn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Crotty, M. (1996). Phenomenology and nursing research. Melbourne, Victoria, Australia: Churchill Livingstone.
  • Darbyshire, P. (1999). Reading Heidegger and interpretive phenomenology: A response to the work of Michael Crotty. Nursing Inquiry, 6, 1725.
  • Eakin, J.M., & Mykhalovskiy, E. (2003). Reframing the evaluation of qualitative health research: Reflections on a review of appraisal guidelines on the health sciences. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 9, 187194.
  • Eakin, J.M., & Mykhalovskiy, E. (2005). Teaching against the grain: The challenges of teaching qualitative research in the health sciences. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6(2), Art 42. Retrieved August 25,2009, from http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/494/1057.
  • Geller, G., & Holtzman, N.A. (1995). A qualitative assessment of primary care physicians' perceptions about the ethical and social implications of offering genetic testing. Qualitative Health Research, 5, 97116.
  • Golden-Biddle, K., & Locke, K. (1993). Appealing work: An investigation of how ethnographic texts convince. Organization Science, 4, 595616.
  • Greckhamer, T., & Koro-Ljungberg, M. (2005). The erosion of a method: Examples from grounded theory. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 18, 729750.
  • Gubrium, J.F., & Holstein, J.A. (1997). The new language of qualitative method. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Hammersley, M. (2006). Philosophy's contribution to social science research on education. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 40, 273286.
  • Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2007). Ethnography: Principles in practice (3rd ed.) London: Routledge.
  • Haraway, D. (1991). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. In: D.Haraway (Ed.), Simians, cyborgs and women: The reinvention of nature (pp. 183201). New York: Routledge.
  • Hardin, P.K. (2001). Theory and language: Locating agency between free will and discursive marionettes. Nursing Inquiry, 8, 1118.
  • Harris, S.R. (2003). Studying equality/inequality: Naturalist and constructionist approaches to equality in marriage. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 32, 200232.
  • Julion, W., Gross, D., Barclay-McLaughlin, G., & Fogg, L. (2007). “It's not just about mommas”: African-American non-resident fathers' views of paternal involvement. Research in Nursing & Health, 30, 595610.
  • Jutel, A. (2009). Sociology of diagnosis: A preliminary review. Sociology of Health & Illness, 31, 278299.
  • Kritzer, H.M. (1996). The data puzzle: The nature of interpretation in quantitative research. American Journal of Political Science, 40, 132.
  • Law, J. (2004). After method: Mess in social science research. London: Routledge.
  • Michener, J. (1978). Chesapeake. New York: Fawcett Crest.
  • Mills, C.W. (1959/1978). The sociological imagination. London: Oxford University Press.
  • Mol, A., & Law, J. (2002). Complexities: An introduction. In: J.Law, & A.Mol (Eds.), Complexities: Social studies of knowledge practices (pp. 122). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Murphy, E. (1999). “Breast is best”: Infant feeding decisions and maternal deviance. Sociology of Health & Illness, 21, 187208.
  • Paley, J. (2005). Phenomenology as rhetoric. Nursing Inquiry, 12, 106116.
  • Pearce, J.C. (1971). The crack in the cosmic egg: Challenging constructs of mind and reality. New York: Washington Square Press.
  • Preissle, J. (2006). Envisioning qualitative inquiry: A view across four decades. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 19, 685695.
  • Rapport, F., Wainwright, P., & Elwyn, G. (2005). “Of the edgelands”: Broadening the scope of qualitative methodology. Medical Humanities, 31, 3742.
  • Rennie, D.L. (2000). Grounded theory methodology as methodical hermeneutics: Reconciling realism and relativism. Theory & Psychology, 10, 481502.
  • Rennie, D.L., & Fergus, K.D. (2006). Embodied categorizing in the grounded theory method: Methodical hermeneutics in action. Theory & Psychology, 16, 483503.
  • Sandelowski, M. (2000). Whatever happened to qualitative description? Research in Nursing & Health, 23, 334340.
  • Sandelowski, M. (2004). Using qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 14, 13661386.
  • Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. (2007). Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research. New York: Springer.
  • Sandelowski, M., Voils, C.I., & Knafl, G. (2009). On quantitizing. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 3, 208222.
  • Smeltzer, S.C. (1994). The concerns of pregnant women with multiple sclerosis. Qualitative Health Research, 4, 480502.
  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Thorne, S. (2008). Interpretive description. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
  • Van Hulle Vincent, C., & Gaddyz, E.J. (2009). Pediatric nurses' thinking in response to vignettes on administering analgesics. Research in Nursing & Health, 32, 530539.
  • Walker, D., & Myrick, F. (2006). Grounded theory: An exploration of process and procedure. Qualitative Health Research, 16, 547559.