The convergence between in-labor report and postpartum recall of parturition pain

Authors

  • Nancy K. Lowe,

    Corresponding author
    • College of Nursing, The Ohio State University, 1585 Neil Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210
    Search for more papers by this author
    • Nancy K. Lowe, PhD. RN, is an Assistant Professor, College of Nursing, The Ohio State University, Columbus.

  • Joyce E. Roberts

    Search for more papers by this author
    • Joyce E. Roberts, PhD, is Division Head of Parent-Child Nursing, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver.


Abstract

This non-experimental study was designed to investigate the congruence between in-labor report and postpartum recall of labor pain as measured by the McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ). Fifty married parturients, ages 19 to 39 at term with a normal pregnancy, served as subjects. Analysis of variance showed that postpartum report of labor pain on the Present Pain Intensity scale of the MPQ was not consistently congruent with pain reported during labor. In contrast, the Pain Rating Index of the MPQ provided postpartum data that was congruent with the in-labor report. Significant interaction effects, however, suggested that postpartally the women tended to devaluate the pain of early labor and inflate the pain of transitional labor when compared to their in-labor report. Theoretical and practical implications of the results for the measurement of labor pain are discussed.

Ancillary