SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Andreoni J. 1989. Giving with impure altruism: applications to charity and Ricardian equivalence. Journal of Political Economy 97: 14471458.
  • Andreoni J. 1990. Impure altruism and donations to public goods: a theory of warm-glow giving. Economic Journal 100: 464477.
  • Andreoni J, Scholz J. 1998. An economic analysis of charitable giving with interdependent preferences. Economic Inquiry 36: 410428.
  • Banks J, Tanner S. 1999. Patterns in household giving: evidence from UK data. International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 10: 167178.
  • Barman E. 2006. Contesting Communities. The Transformation of Workplace Charity. Stanford University Press: Stanford, California, USA.
  • Barman E. 2008. With strings attached: nonprofits and the adoption of donor choice. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 37(1): 3956.
  • Bekkers R. 2003. Trust, accreditation, and philanthropy in the Netherlands. Nonprofit & Voluntary Sector Quarterly 32: 596615.
  • Bekkers R. 2005. It's not all in the ask: effects and effectiveness of recruitment strategies used by nonprofits in the Netherlands. 33rd Annual ARNOVA Conference, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Bekkers R. 2006. Keeping the faith: origins of confidence in charitable organizations and its consequences for philanthropy. NCVO/VSSN Researching the Voluntary Sector Conference 2006, Coventry, UK.
  • Bekkers R, Bowman W. 2009. The relationship between confidence in charitable organizations and volunteering revisited. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 38: 884.
  • Bekkers R, Wiepking P. 2010. A literature review of empirical studies of philanthropy: eight mechanisms that drive charitable giving. Nonprofit &Voluntary Sector Quarterly XX(X): 150.
  • Bowman W. 2003. Workplace giving: a case study of the combined federal campaign. New Directions for Philanthropic Fundraising 2003(41): 2737.
  • Bowman W. 2004. Confidence in charitable institutions and volunteering. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 33: 247270.
  • Brown C, Medoff J. 1989. The employer size–wage effect. Journal of Political Economy 97(5): 10271059.
  • Carroll J, McCarthy S, Newman C. 2006. An econometric analysis of charitable donations in the Republic of Ireland. The Economic and Social Review 36: 229249.
  • Chamberlin J. 1978. The logic of collective action: some experimental results. Behavioral Science 23(5): 441445.
  • Giving USA. 2007. Chicago, IL: Giving USA Foundation.
  • Giving USA. 2011. Chicago, IL: Giving USA Foundation.
  • Gneezy U, List JA. 2006. Putting behavioral economics to work: testing for gift exchange in labor markets using field experiments. Econometrica 74(5): 13651384.
  • Groshen E. 1991. Five reasons why wages vary among employers? Industrial Relations 30(3): 350381.
  • Hansmann H. 1980. The role of nonprofit enterprise. Yale Law Journal 89: 835898.
  • Houston D. 2006. “Walking the walk” of public service motivation: public employees and charitable gifts of time, blood, and money. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 16(1): 6786.
  • Isaac R, Walker J, Williams A. 1994. Group size and the voluntary provision of public goods: experimental evidence utilizing large groups. Journal of Public Economics 54(1): 136.
  • Ledyard J. 1995. Public goods: a survey of experimental research. In Handbook of Experimental Economics, Kagel J, Roth A (eds). Princeton Univ. Press: Princeton, New Jersey; 111252.
  • Light PC. 2002. Trust in charitable organizations. Policy Brief #6. Brookings Institution Press: Washington.
  • Mesch DJ, Rooney PM, Steinberg KS, Denton B. 2006. The effects of race, gender, and marital status on giving and volunteering in Indiana. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 35(4): 565587.
  • National Committee for Responsive Philanthropy. 2003. Giving at Work 2003.
  • Oi W, Idson T. 1999. Firm size and wages. In Handbook of Labor Economics: Volume 3, Ashenfelter O, Card D (eds). Elsevier Science: Amsterdam; 21652214.
  • Olson M. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA.
  • Pitts R, Skelly G. 1984. Economic self-interest and other motivational factors underlying charitable giving. Journal of Behavioral Economics 13: 93109.
  • Romney-Alexander D. 2002. Payroll giving in the UK: donor incentives and influences on giving behavior. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing 7(1): 8492.
  • Rooney PM, Steinberg K, Schervish PG. 2001. A methodological comparison of giving surveys: Indiana as a test case. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 30(3): 551568.
  • Sargeant A, Lee S. 2004. Trust and relationship commitment in the United Kingdom voluntary sector: determinants of donor behavior. Psychology and Marketing 21: 613635.
  • Sargeant A, Ford J, West D. 2006. Perceptual determinants of nonprofit giving behavior. Journal of Business Research 59(2): 155165.
  • Schervish P, Havens J. 1995. Do the poor pay more: is the U-shaped curve correct? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 24: 7990.
  • Schervish PG, O'Herlihy MA, Havens JJ. 2006. Charitable giving: how much, by whom, to what, and how? In The Nonprofit Sector: A Research Handbook, Powell W, Steinberg R (eds). Yale University Press: New Haven, CT.
  • Simmons WO, Emanuele R. 2004. Does government spending crowd out donations of time and money? Public Finance Review 32(5): 498511.
  • Weisbrod BA, Dominguez ND. 1986. Demand for collective goods in private nonprofit market: can fundraising expenditures help overcome free-riding behavior? Journal of Public Economics 30(1): 8395.
  • Wilhelm MO, Brown E, Rooney PM, Steinberg RS. 2006. The intergenerational transmission of generosity. Working paper, IUPUI.
  • Wilhelm MO, Rooney PM, Tempel ER. 2007. Changes in religious giving reflect changes in involvement: age and cohort effects in religious giving, secular giving, and attendance. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 46: 217232.
  • Zech CE. 2000. Generational differences in the determinants of religious giving. Review of Religious Research 41(4): 545559.