SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Cited in:

CrossRef

This article has been cited by:

  1. 1
    B.M. Rothschild, D.R. Wilhite, D.S. McLeod, H. Ting, Evidence from surface microscopy for recognition of fleshy and tendinous muscle insertion in extant vertebrate femora: implications for muscle reconstruction in fossils, Historical Biology, 2016, 28, 6, 842

    CrossRef

  2. 2
    C. Y. Henderson, E. Nikita, Accounting for multiple effects and the problem of small sample sizes in osteology: a case study focussing on entheseal changes, Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 2015,

    CrossRef

  3. 3
    Sarah A. Schrader, Elucidating inequality in Nubia: An examination of entheseal changes at Kerma (Sudan), American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 2015, 156, 2
  4. 4
    Karyne N. Rabey, David J. Green, Andrea B. Taylor, David R. Begun, Brian G. Richmond, Shannon C. McFarlin, Locomotor activity influences muscle architecture and bone growth but not muscle attachment site morphology, Journal of Human Evolution, 2015, 78, 91

    CrossRef

  5. 5
    Elizabeth Weiss, The surface of bones: methods of recording entheseal changes, Surface Topography: Metrology and Properties, 2015, 3, 3, 034003

    CrossRef

  6. 6
    Pere Ibáñez-Gimeno, Ignasi Galtés, Joan Manyosa, Assumpció Malgosa, Xavier Jordana, Analysis of the forearm rotational efficiency in extant hominoids: New insights into the functional implications of upper limb skeletal structure, Journal of Human Evolution, 2014, 76, 165

    CrossRef

  7. 7
    Lara K. Noldner, Heather J.H. Edgar, 3D representation and analysis of enthesis morphology, American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 2013, 152, 3
  8. 8
    C. Y. Henderson, F. Alves Cardoso, Special Issue Entheseal Changes and Occupation: Technical and Theoretical Advances and Their Applications, International Journal of Osteoarchaeology, 2013, 23, 2