1099-162X/asset/PAD_left.gif?v=1&s=f39b3cad6597f39c4db4391b76d134b6c0f02a7b)
Research Article
On twinning: the impact of naming an EU accession programme on the effective implementation of its projects
Article first published online: 18 NOV 2005
DOI: 10.1002/pad.391
Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Issue
1099-162X/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=5d2544c0d91a3d17005bdbfb060920cd9fd07741 "Public Administration and Development")
Public Administration and Development
Special Issue: Reforming Aid Management
Volume 25, Issue 5, pages 437–443, December 2005
Additional Information
How to Cite
O'Connor, S. and Kowalski, R. (2005), On twinning: the impact of naming an EU accession programme on the effective implementation of its projects. Public Admin. Dev., 25: 437–443. doi: 10.1002/pad.391
Publication History
- Issue published online: 18 NOV 2005
- Article first published online: 18 NOV 2005
- Abstract
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- EU Programmes;
- metaphors;
- technical assistance;
- terminology;
- twinning projects
Abstract
The introduction of the Twinning instrument as its principal institution-building mechanism in countries applying to join the European Union saw the appearance of a vocabulary very much at divergence with the language associated with other ‘Technical Assistance’ programmes. The arbitrary and connotational character of this heavily metaphorical terminology has differentiated Twinning from other programmes in the minds of those involved in the programme. At the same time, however, it has also resulted in a measure of ambiguity and confusion among project ‘partners’—principally over their roles and responsibilities. This problem could be overcome by targeting any one of the three points in Peirce's semiotic model: by changing the signs of twinning; by re-attuning the users' interpretants; or by bringing the object, the Twinning programme itself, closer to how the signs of twinning are actually perceived and understood. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.