SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Anderson, K., Burkhauser, R., & Raymond, J. (1993) The effect of creaming on placement rates under the Job Training Partnership Act. Industrial and Labor Relation Review, 46(1), 613624.
  • Asch, B. J. (2005). The economic complexities of incentive reforms. In R.Klitgaard & P. C.Light (Eds.), High-performance government: Structure, leadership, incentives (pp. 309342). Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
  • Baker, G. P. (1992) Incentive contracts and performance measurement. Journal of Political Economy, 100(3), 598614.
  • Barnow, B., & Smith, J. (2004) Performance management of U.S. job training programs: Lessons from the Job Training Partnership Act. Public Finance and Management, 4(3), 247287.
  • Bevan, G., & Hood, C. (2006) What's measured is what matters: Targets and gaming in the English public health care system. Public Administration, 84(3), 517538.
  • Blau, P. M. (1955). The dynamics of bureaucracy: A study of interpersonal relations in two government agencies. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Bloom, M., & Milkovich, G. P. (1998) Relationships among risk, incentive pay, and organizational performance. The Academy of Management Journal, 41(3), 283297.
  • Bouwens, J., & van Lent, L. (2004). The relation between performance measure properties and effort and selection effects of incentive contracts. Tilburg University. Unpublished manuscript.
  • Courty, P., & Marschke, G. (2004) An empirical investigation of gaming responses to performance incentives. Journal of Labor Economics, 22(1), 2356.
  • Cragg, M. (1997) Performance incentives in the public sector: Evidence from the Job Training Partnership Act. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 13(1), 147168.
  • Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D., & Donaldson, L. (1997) Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 2047.
  • Dewatripont, M., Jewitt, I., & Tirole, J. (1999) The economics of career concerns, Part I: Comparing information structures. Journal of Political Economy, 107(1), 139.
  • Dixit, A. (2002) Incentives and organizations in the public sector. Journal of Human Resources, 37(4), 696727.
  • Frederickson, G., & Hart, D. K. (1985) Public service and the patriotism of benelovence. Public Administration Review, 45, 547553.
  • Gibbons, R. (1998) Incentives in organizations. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12(4), 115132.
  • Gibson, J. L., Ivancevich, J. M., & Donnelly, J. H. (1991). Organizations. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
  • Goff-Parker, K. (2004) You're doing an awesome job: OKDHS employees receive $1,000 bonus. Inside OKDHS(December), 15.
  • Grizzle, G. A. (2002) Performance measurement and dysfunction: The dark side of quantifying work. Public Performance and Management Review, 25(4), 363369.
  • Heckman, J. J., Heinrich, C. J., & Smith, J. A. (2002) The performance of performance standards. The Journal of Human Resources, 37(4), 778811.
  • Heckman, J. J., Smith, J. A., & Taber, C. (1996). What do bureaucrats do? The effects of performance standards and bureaucratic preferences on acceptance into the JTPA Program. In G.Libecap (Ed.), Advances in the study of entrepreneurship, innovation and economic growth, Volume 7 (pp. 191218). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  • Heinrich, C. J. (2004) Improving public-sector performance management: One step forward, two steps back? Public Finance and Management, 4(3), 317351.
  • Holmstrom, B., & Milgrom, P. (1994) The firm as incentive system. American Economic Review, 84, 972991.
  • Ittner, C. D., Larcker, D. F., & Rajan, M. V. (1997) The choice of performance measures in annual bonus contracts. The Accounting Review, 72(2), 231255.
  • Jacob, B. A., & Levitt, S. (2003) Rotten apples: An investigation of the prevalence and predictors of teacher cheating. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(3), 843877.
  • Milgrom, P., & Roberts, J. (1988) An economic approach to influence activities in organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 94(Supplement), S154S179.
  • Miller, G. J., (1992). Managerial dilemmas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Perry, J. L., & Porter, L. (1982) Factors affecting the context for motivation in public organizations. Academy of Management Review, 7(1), 8998.
  • Perry, J. L., & Wise, L. R. (1990) The motivational bases of public service. Public Administration Review, 50, 367373.
  • Prendergast, C. (1999) The provision of incentives in firms. Journal of Economic Literature, 37(1), 763.
  • Radin, B. (2000) The Government Performance and Results Act and the tradition of federal management reform: Square pegs in round holes? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(1), 1135.
  • Rainey, H. (1982) Reward preferences among public and private managers: In search of the service ethic. American Review of Public Administration, 50(3), 374382.
  • Report of the National Commission on the Public Service. (2003). Urgent business for America: Revitalizing the federal government for the 21st century. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
  • Schick, A. (2001). Getting performance measures to measure up. In D. W.Forsythe (Ed.), Quicker, better, cheaper: Managing performance in American government (pp. 3960). Albany, NY: Rockefeller Institute Press.
  • Trutko, J., Barnow, B., Farrell, M., & Glosser, A. (March 2005). Earnings replacement outcomes for dislocated workers: Extent of variation and factors accounting for variation in earnings replacement outcomes across state and local workforce investment boards. Final Report to the U.S. Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration.
  • U.S. Department of Labor, Employment, and Training Administration. (2001). 2002 Annual performance plan for Committee on Appropriations. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor.
  • U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2002). Improvements needed in performance measures to provide a more accurate picture of WIA's GAO Report #02-275.
  • Van Slyke, D. (in press). Agents or stewards: Using theory to understand the governmentnonprofit social services contracting relationship. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory.
  • Walker, R. M., & Boyne, G. A. (2006) Public management reform and organizational performance: An empirical assessment of the U.K. labour government's public service improvement strategy. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 25(2), 371393.
  • Wilson, W. (1887) The study of administration. Political Science Quarterly, 2(2), 197222.
  • Wiseman, M. (2004). The high performance bonus. The George Washington University. Unpublished manuscript.