SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Alspaugh, J. W. (1998). The relationship of school to school transitions and school size to high school dropout rates. The High School Journal, 81, 154160.
  • Alspaugh, J. W. (2001). Achievement loss associated with the transition to middle school and high school. The Journal of Educational Research, 92, 2025.
  • Alspaugh, J. W., & Harting, R. D. (1995). Transition effects of school grade-level organization on student achievement. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 28, 145149.
  • Barber, B. K., & Olsen, J. A. (2004). Assessing the transitions to middle and high school. Journal of Adolescent Research, 19, 330.
  • Bedard, K., & Do, C. (2005). Are middle schools more effective? The impact of school structure on student outcomes. Journal of Human Resources, 40, 660682.
  • Cleveland, H. H., & Wiebe, R. P. (2003). The moderation of adolescent-to-peer similarity in tobacco and alcohol use by school levels of substance use. Child Development, 74, 279291.
  • Clotfelter, C. T., Ladd, H. F., & Vigdor, J. L. (2006). Teacher-student matching and the assessment of teacher effectiveness. Journal of Human Resources, 41, 778820.
  • Cook, P. J. (2003). Comment on catching cheating teachers. In W. G.Gale & J. R.Pack (Eds.), Brookings-Wharton Papers on Urban Affairs 2003 (pp. 210215. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
  • Crump, R. K., Hotz, V. J., Imbens, G. W., & Mitnik, O. A. (2006). Moving the goalposts: Addressing limited overlap in the estimation of average treatment effects by changing the estimand. NBER Technical Working Paper 330, Cambridge, MA.
  • Dehejia, R.,& Wahba, S. (1999). Causal effects in nonexperimental studies: Reevaluating the evaluation of training programs. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94, 10531062.
  • Eccles, J. S., Wigfield, A., Midgley, C., Reuman, D., MacIver, D., & Feldlaufer, H. (1993). Negative effects of traditional middle schools on students' motivation. The Elementary School Journal, 93, 553574.
  • Elias, M. J., Gara, M., & Ubriaco, M. (1985). Sources of stress and support in children's transition to middle school: An empirical analysis. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 14, 112118.
  • Ellickson, P. L., McCaffrey, D. F., Ghosh-Dastidar, B., & Longshore, D. L. (2003). New inroads in preventing adolescent drug use: Results from a large-scale trial of Project ALERT in middle schools. American Journal of Public Health, 93, 18301836.
  • Goldin, C. (1999). A brief history of education in the United States. NBER Historical Paper No. 119, Cambridge, MA.
  • Gootman, E. (2007a). Trying to find solutions in chaotic middle schools. The New York Times, Jan. 3, A1.
  • Gootman, E. (2007b). Taking middle schoolers out of the middle. The New York Times, Jan. 4, A1.
  • Hanushek, E., Kain, J., & Rivkin, S. (2004). Disruption versus tiebout improvement: The costs and benefits of switching schools. Journal of Public Economics, 88, 17211746.
  • Hardy, C., Bukowski, W. M., & Sippola, L. K. (2002). Stability and change in peer relationships during the transition to middle level school. Journal of Early Adolescence, 22, 117142.
  • Hough, D. (1997). A bona fide middle school: Programs, policy, practice, and grade span configurations. In J. L.Irvin (Ed.), What current research says to the middle level practitioner (pp. 285294). Westerville, OH: National Middle School Association.
  • Jacob, B. A., & Levitt, S. D. (2003). Catching cheating teachers: The results of an unusual experiment in implementing theory. In W. G.Gale & J. R.Pack (Eds.), Brookings-Wharton Papers on Urban Affairs 2003 (pp. 185220). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
  • Jacobson, M. (2004). Baby booms and drug busts: Trends in youth drug use in the United States, 1975–2000. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119, 14811512.
  • Jang, S. J. (1999). Age-varying effects of family, school and peers on delinquency: A multilevel modeling test of interactional theory. Criminology, 37, 643685.
  • Juvonen, J., Le, V., Kaganoff, T., Augustine, C., & Constant, L. (2004). Focus on the wonder years: Challenges facing the American middle school. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
  • Maguin, E., & Loeber, R. (1996). Academic performance and delinquency. In M.Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of the research (pp. 145264). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Manski, C. F. (1993). Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem. Review of Economic Studies, 60, 531542.
  • McEwin, K. C., Greene, M. W., & Jenkins, D. M. (2001). Where do North Carolina's middle schools stand in the 21st century? A status report on programs and practices. Pinehurst, NC: North Carolina Middle School Association.
  • McLeod, J. D., & Kaiser, K. (2004). Childhood emotional and behavioral problems in educational attainment. American Sociological Review, 69, 636658.
  • Mills, R. (1998). Grouping students for instruction in middle schools. Eric Digest, Report: EDO-PS-98–4.
  • National Middle School Association. (1995). This we believe: Developmentally responsive middle level schools. Columbus, OH: Author.
  • National Middle School Association. (2001). Grade configuration. NMSA Research Summary #1 (updated September 2001). Columbus, OH: Author.
  • North Carolina Department of Public Instruction (2004). Last best chance 2004: Educating young adolescents in the twenty-first century. Middle Grades Task Force Report. North Carolina Department of Public Instruction and State Board of Education.
  • Reinke, W. M., & Walker, H. M. (2006). Deviant peer effects in education. In K. A.Dodge, T. J.Dishion, & J. E.Lansford (Eds.), Deviant peer influences in programs for youth (pp. 122140). New York: The Guilford Press.
  • Rudolph, K. D., Lambert, S. F., Clark, A. G., & Kurlakowsky, K. D. (2001). Negotiating the transition to middle school: The role of self-regulatory processes. Child Development, 72, 929946.
  • Rumberger, R. W. (1995). Dropping out of middle school: A multilevel analysis of students and schools. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 583625.
  • Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (1992). Crime and deviance in the life course. Annual Review of Sociology, 18, 6384.
  • Simmons, R. O., & Blythe, D. A. (1987). Moving into adolescence. New York, NY: Aldin De Gruyter.
  • South, S. J., & Messner, S. F. (2000). Crime and demography: Multiple linkages, reciprocal relations. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 83106.
  • Teitler, J., & Weiss, C. (2000). Effects of neighborhood and school environments on transitions to first sexual intercourse. Sociology of Education, 73, 112132.
  • Valentine, J. W., Clark, D., Hackmann, D., & Petzo, V. (2002). Leadership in middle level schools, volume I: A national study of middle level leaders and school principals. Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals.
  • Weiss, C. C., & Knipes, L. (2006). Reexamining middle school effects: A comparison of middle grades students in middle schools and K-8 schools. American Journal of Education, 112, 239272.
  • Zernicke, K. (2007). The preteen: Betwixt and bedeviled. The New York Times, Jan. 7, 4:3.