• Bartik, T. J. (2001). Jobs for the poor: Can labor demand policies help? New York: Russell Sage Foundation; Kalamazoo, MI: W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
  • Bishop, J., & Haveman, R. (1979). Selective employment subsidies: Can Okun's law be repealed? The American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 1969, 124130.
  • Bishop, J. H., & Kang, S. (1991). Applying for entitlements: Employers and the targeted jobs tax credit. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 10, 2445.
  • Bishop, J., & Montgomery, M. (1986). Evidence on firm participation in employment subsidy programs. Industrial Relations, 25, 5664.
  • Bishop, J., & Montgomery, M. (1993). Does the targeted jobs tax credit create jobs at subsidized firms? Industrial Relations, 32, 289306.
  • Black, D., & Smith, J. (2004). How robust is the evidence on the effects of college quality? Evidence from matching. Journal of Econometrics, 121, 99124.
  • Blundell, R., & Meghir, C. (2001). Active labour market policy vs. employment tax credits: Lessons from recent UK reforms. Swedish Economic Policy Review, 8, 239266.
  • Christensen, S. (1984). The targeted jobs tax credit. Washington, DC: Congressional Budget Office.
  • DeVaro, J. (2003). The labor market effects of employer recruitment choice. Retrieved January 9, 2008, from
  • Hamersma, S. (2003). The work opportunity and welfare-to-work tax credits: Participation rates among eligible workers. National Tax Journal, 56, 725738.
  • Hamersma, S. (2005). The effects of an employer subsidy on employment outcomes: A study of the work opportunity and welfare-to-work tax credits. IRP Disc. Paper #1303–05.
  • Hamersma, S. (2007). Why don't eligible firms claim hiring subsidies? The role of job duration. Manuscript submitted for publication.
  • Hamersma, S., & Heinrich, C. (in press). Temporary help service firms' use of employer taxcredits: Implications for disadvantaged workers' labor market outcomes. Southern Economic Journal.
  • Heckman, J. J., Ichimura, H., Smith, J., & Todd, P. (1998). Characterizing selection bias using experimental data. Econometrica, 66, 10171098.
  • Heckman, J. J., Ichimura, H., & Todd, P. (1997). Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator: Evidence from evaluating a job training programme. Review of Economic Studies, 64, 605654.
  • Heckman, J. J., Ichimura, H., & Todd, P. (1998). Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator. Review of Economic Studies, 65, 261294.
    Direct Link:
  • Hollenbeck, K., Willke, R., & Ershadi, J. (1986). The effects of TJTC on disadvantaged populations. Columbus: The National Center for Research in Vocational Education at The Ohio State University.
  • Kaplan, T. (2000). Wisconsin's W-2 program: Welfare as we might come to know it? In C.Weissert (Ed.), Learning from leaders: Welfare reform politics and policy in five Midwestern states (pp. 77118). Albany, NY: Rockefeller Institute Press.
  • Katz, L. F. (1998). Wage subsidies for the disadvantaged. In R. B.Freeman & P.Gottschalk (Eds.), Generating jobs: How to increase demand for less-skilled workers. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Leuven, E., & Sianesi, B. (2003). PSMATCH2: Stata module to perform full Mahalanobis and propensity score matching, common support graphing, and covariate imbalance testing. Version 3.0.0. Retrieved January 15, 2005, from
  • Mauer, U. (2006). The problems of the CDU/CSU combi-wage concept—transparency and simplicity cause revolving-door effects. Talking Point: Deutsche Bank Research. Retrieved January 9, 2008, from
  • O'Neill, D. M. (1982). Employment tax credit programs: The effects of socioeconomic targeting provisions. Journal of Human Resources, 17, 449459.
  • Perloff, J. M., & Wachter, M. (1979). The new jobs tax credit: An evaluation of the 1977–78 wage subsidy program. American Economic Review, 69, 173179.
  • Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 701, 4155.
  • Shields, M., & Deller, S. C. (1996). Clustering Wisconsin counties for analytical comparisons. Center for Community Economic Development Staff Paper 96.7, University of Wisconsin-Madison/Extension.
  • Smith, J., & Todd, P. (2005a). Does matching overcome Lalonde's critique of nonexperimental estimators? Journal of Econometrics, 125, 305353.
  • Smith, J., & Todd, P. (2005b). Does matching overcome Lalonde's critique of nonexperimental estimators? Rejoinder. Journal of Econometrics, 125, 365375.
  • Todd, P. (1999). A practical guide to implementing matching estimators. IADB meeting paper. Retrieved January 9, 2008, from˜petra/papers/prac.pdf.
  • U.S. Department of Labor. (2001, March). Employers' use and assessment of the WOTC and Welfare-to-Work tax credits program. Final Report.
  • U.S. General Accounting Office (GAO). (2001). Work Opportunity Tax Credit: Employers do not appear to dismiss employees to increase tax credits. Report to the Chairman, Subcommittee on Oversight, Committee on Ways and Means, House of Representatives. (GAO-01-329). Washington, DC: U.S. General Accounting Office. Retrieved January 9, 2008, from
  • U.S. General Accounting Office (GAO). (2002). Business tax incentives: Incentives to employ workers with disabilities receive limited use and have an uncertain impact. Report to Congressional Committees. (GAO-03-39). Washington, DC: U.S. General Accounting Office. Retrieved January 9, 2008, from
  • Wilde, E. T., & Hollister, R. (2007). How close is close enough? Evaluating propensity score matching using data from a class size reduction experiment. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 26, 455477.