SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Boyd, D., Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2005). Explaining the short careers of high-achieving teachers in schools with low-performing students. American Economic Review, 95, 166171.
  • Boyd, D., Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2011). Teacher layoffs: An empirical illustration of seniority v. measures of effectiveness. Education Finance and Policy, 6, 439454.
  • Chen, D. W., & Hernandez, J. C. (2011, May 6). Mayor announces plan to lay off thousands of teachers. The New York Times. Retrieved June 1, 2013, from http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/06/nyregion/bloomberg-budget-will-seek-400-million-more-in-cuts.html?_r=1.
  • Cohen-Vogel, L., & Osborne-Lampkin, L. (2007). Allocating quality: Collective bargaining agreements and administrative discretion over teacher assignment. Educational Administration Quarterly, 43, 433461.
  • Cornelissen, T. (2008). The Stata command felsdvreg to fit a linear model with two high-dimensional fixed effects. Stata Journal, 8, 170189.
  • Goldhaber, D., & Theobald, R. (2011). Managing the teacher workforce in austere times: The implications of teacher layoffs. CEDR Working Paper 2011–1.3. Seattle, WA: University of Washington.
  • Grissom, J. A. (2011). Can good principals keep teachers in disadvantaged schools? Linking principal effectiveness to teacher satisfaction and turnover in hard-to-staff environments. Teachers College Record, 113, 25522585.
  • Grissom, J. A., & Keiser, L. (2011). A supervisor like me: Race, representation, and the satisfaction and turnover decisions of public sector employees. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 30, 557580.
  • Grissom, J. A., Nicholson-Crotty, J., & Keiser, L. (2012). Does my boss's gender matter? Explaining job satisfaction and employee turnover in the public sector. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22, 649673.
  • Guarino, C., Santibañez, L., & Daley, G. (2006). Teacher recruitment and retention: A review of the recent empirical literature. Review of Educational Research, 36, 6387.
  • Herrmann, M. A., & Rockoff, J. E. (2012). Worker absence and productivity: Evidence from teaching. Journal of Labor Economics, 30, 749782.
  • Jackson, C. K. (2010). Match quality, worker productivity, and worker mobility: Direct evidence from teachers. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 15990. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Jackson, C. K., & Bruegmann, E. (2009). Teaching students and teaching each other: The importance of peer learning for teachers. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 1, 85108.
  • Jacob, B. A. (2011). Do principals fire the worst teachers? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33, 403434.
  • Keigher, A. (2010). Teacher attrition and mobility: Results from the 2008–09 Teacher Follow-up Survey. NCES 2010-353. U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved June 1, 2013, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch.
  • Koski, W. S., & Horng, E. L. (2007). Facilitating the teacher quality gap? Collective bargaining agreements, teacher hiring and transfer rules, and teacher assignment among schools in California. Education Finance and Policy, 2, 262300.
  • Ladd, H. F. (2011). Teachers’ perceptions of their working conditions: How predictive of planned and actual teacher movement? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33, 235261.
  • Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2002). Teacher sorting and the plight of urban schools: A descriptive analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24, 3762.
  • Levin, J., Mulhern, J., & Schunck, J. (2005). Unintended consequences: The case for reforming the staffing rules in urban teachers union contracts. Brooklyn, NY: The New Teacher Project.
  • Loeb, S., Darling-Hammond, L., & Luczak, J. (2005). How teaching conditions predict teacher turnover in California schools. Peabody Journal of Education, 80, 4470.
  • Loeb, S., Beteille, T., & Kalogrides, D. (2012). Effective schools: Teacher hiring, assignment, development, and retention. Education Finance and Policy, 7, 269304.
  • Miller, R. T., Murnane, R. J., & Willett, J. B. (2008). Do teacher absences impact student achievement? Longitudinal evidence from one urban school district. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 30, 181200.
  • Moe, T. M. (2005). Bottom-up structure: Collective bargaining, transfer rights, and the education of disadvantaged children. Unpublished paper. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University.
  • Moe, T. M. (2009). Collective bargaining and the performance of the public schools. American Journal of Political Science, 53, 156174.
  • National Council on Teacher Quality. (2009). Teacher rules, roles, and rights: Miami-Dade County School District, Florida. Retrieved February 17, 2013, from http://www.nctq.org/tr3/districtHomepage.jsp?districtId=5.
  • National Council on Teacher Quality. (2010). Bumping HR: Giving principals more say over staffing. Retrieved February 17, 2013, from http://www.nctq.org/tr3/docs/nctq_site_based_hiring.pdf.
  • Norton, M. S. (1998). Teacher absenteeism: A growing dilemma in education. Contemporary Education, 69, 9599.
  • Strunk, K. O., & Grissom, J. A. (2010). Do strong unions shape district policies? Collective bargaining, teacher contract restrictiveness, and the political power of teachers’ unions. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 32, 389406.
  • United Teachers of Dade. (2009). M-DCPS/UTD successor contract, 2006 (amended 2009). Retrieved November 1, 2012, from http://www2.dadeschools.net/employees/labor_union/UTD/index.htm.