SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Cited in:

CrossRef

This article has been cited by:

  1. 1
    J.M. Jørgensen, P.L. Hedley, M. Gjerris, M. Christiansen, Including ethical considerations in models for first-trimester screening for pre-eclampsia, Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 2014,

    CrossRef

  2. 2
    Stefan C. Kane, Fabricio Da Silva Costa, Shaun P. Brennecke, New directions in the prediction of pre-eclampsia, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2014, 54, 2
  3. 3
    C Hyde, S Thornton, Does screening for pre-eclampsia make sense?, BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 2013, 120, 10
  4. 4
    Stefan R. Hansson, Magnus Gram, Bo Åkerström, Fetal hemoglobin in preeclampsia, Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2013, 25, 6, 448

    CrossRef

  5. 5
    MAURO PARRA-CORDERO, SHOULD A FIRST-TRIMESTER RISK ASSESSMENT FOR PRE-ECLAMPSIA BE ROUTINELY OFFERED?, Fetal and Maternal Medicine Review, 2013, 24, 02, 129

    CrossRef

  6. You have free access to this content6
    C. E. Kleinrouweler, P. M. M. Bossuyt, B. Thilaganathan, K. C. Vollebregt, J. Arenas Ramírez, A. Ohkuchi, K. L. Deurloo, M. Macleod, A. E. Diab, H. Wolf, J. A. M. van der Post, B. W. J. Mol, E. Pajkrt, Value of adding second-trimester uterine artery Doppler to patient characteristics in identification of nulliparous women at increased risk for pre-eclampsia: an individual patient data meta-analysis, Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2013, 42, 3