Funding sources: The project described was assisted by the Irving Institute for Clinical and Translational Research which was supported by Grant Number UL1 RR024156 from the National Center for Research Resources (NCRR), a component of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and NIH Roadmap for Medical Research, and its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official view of NCRR or NIH. Information on NCRR is available at NCRR Website. Information on Re-engineering the Clinical Research Enterprise can be obtained from NIH Roadmap website.
Amniocentesis in twin pregnancies: a systematic review of the literature
Article first published online: 26 OCT 2011
© 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Volume 32, Issue 5, pages 409–416, May 2012
How to Cite
Vink, J., Fuchs, K. and D'Alton, M. E. (2012), Amniocentesis in twin pregnancies: a systematic review of the literature. Prenat. Diagn., 32: 409–416. doi: 10.1002/pd.2897
Conflicts of interests: None declared
- Issue published online: 9 MAY 2012
- Article first published online: 26 OCT 2011
Using published data, we sought to determine the amniocentesis-related loss rate in twin gestations.
We searched the PUBMED database using keywords “amniocentesis”, “twin” and “twins” to identify articles evaluating genetic amniocentesis in twin gestations published from January 1970 to December 2010. Random effects models were used to pool procedure-related loss rates from included studies.
The definition of “loss” varied across the 17 studies identified (Table 1). The pooled procedure-related loss rate at < 24 weeks was 3.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.6-4.7) (Figure 2). Pooled loss rates at < 28 weeks (Figure 4) and to term (Figure 5) could not be calculated due to unacceptable heterogeneity of available data. Seven studies included a control (no amniocentesis) group and reported a pooled odds ratio for total pregnancy loss among cases of 1.8 (95% CI 1.2-2.7) (Figure 3). Only 1 study reported procedure-related loss rates by chorionicity (7.7% among monochorionics vs 1.4% among controls; p 0.02).
Analysis of published data demonstrated a pooled amniocentesis-related loss rate of 3.5% in twin gestations < 24 weeks. Pooled loss rates within other post-amniocentesis intervals or other gestational age windows and the impact of chorionicity on procedure-related loss rates cannot be determined from published data. © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.